Dr Griffin claims he is ready for debate

bofors said:
Why don't you try me instead then.
Click to expand...


If you'd like, create a thread offering up what you feel is the single most important piece of evidence that the official account of 9/11 is false.

-Gumboot
 
If DRG is now saying he's ready to debate any debunker maybe Ron should try and approach him again with regards to an appearance on Hardfire.
 
I'd like to see him debate any debunker, because any debunker can school him.

I'd suggest Mark. And gumboot has some excellent background on his claims, gained from his Griffin debunking work. Heck, anyone from here suits just fine.
 
Last edited:
Yooo Hooo! Oh, Pomeroo!

Ron should arrange a hardfire debate between Griffin and Mark.
 
Look at the quote a little closer...

From LCF:
went to see Dr. Griffin.
He is very articulate and knowledgeable concerning the events of 911. He and his fellow truthers would like to have a debate with any of the debunkers. I would like to see that as well. Fema would look like a bunch of preschoolers - oops sorry preschoolers I didn't mean to insult any of you.
Like he himself said about his non Engineer degree - "I can read".
He takes personal affront as do I at being considered a conspiracist when, in fact, it is they who have attempted to spread the conspiracy - however ludicrous.
Click to expand...

1. I suspect he will not debate one on one. I think he is hinting at a rekindling of the old debate suggestion from last year, team versus team.

2. If they stuck to only issues FEMA had knowledge of, I am sure FEMA could hold their own in a debate. Why they think some FEMA scientist or engineer would have details on "foreknowledge" or UA93, is beyond me...

3. Similarly, I would love to see a debate between DRG and Mark, but I can almost guarantee it will not happen.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Look at the quote a little closer...

From LCF:


1. I suspect he will not debate one on one. I think he is hinting at a rekindling of the old debate suggestion from last year, team versus team.

2. If they stuck to only issues FEMA had knowledge of, I am sure FEMA could hold their own in a debate. Why they think some FEMA scientist or engineer would have details on "foreknowledge" or UA93, is beyond me...

3. Similarly, I would love to see a debate between DRG and Mark, but I can almost guarantee it will not happen.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Hmmm. Not good.
It seems that DRG is willing to debate any debunker, meaning debating NIST or FEMA. Which, of course, would never happen and is a safe challange.
 
Tell you what, Mr. Griffin: show us that you can handle, say, a NYC tour guide then maybe you can work your way up to NIST, OK?

It's telling that one of the top minds of Twoofer Land has never debated anyone on 9/11!

Even the average single white male twoofer in the street is willing to debate passersby.
 
Last edited:
Hyperviolet said:
Yooo Hooo! Oh, Pomeroo!

Ron should arrange a hardfire debate between Griffin and Mark.
Click to expand...

Griffin will never agree to such a thing:

The rules of twoofer debate:

#1 - Don't debate Mark Roberts
#2 - Quantity, not quality. Say as much as possible, it's not about the quality of the debate, but about how many claims you can make that your opponent doesn't refute.
#3 - Team up. If possible, never go into the debate 1-on-1.
#4 - Any evidence that the debunker presents is faked.
#5 - Laugh at your opponent. It makes you look smarter.
#6 - The debunker is a liar.
-Bermas Correlary - Remind your opponent of this.
#5 - You won. No matter what anyone says, you(the truther) are the winner of the debate. Anyone who says otherwise is a shill.
 
You forgot.:
When you go to a debate as a team, only one of you do the talking while the other goes into a coma.
 
uruk said:
You forgot.:
When you go to a debate as a team, only one of you do the talking while the other goes into a coma.
Click to expand...

I can see it now....

Pinch-hitting for David Ray Griffin will be Jason Bermass who struck out his last time up.
 
pomeroo said:
I will, in fact, do just that!
Click to expand...


If it hasn't been stated, Ron, you should invite the inventor of the "voice morphing technology" onto your show to confront DRG face to face about his claims on those airphones.
 
Arus808 said:
If it hasn't been stated, Ron, you should invite the inventor of the "voice morphing technology" onto your show to confront DRG face to face about his claims on those airphones.
Click to expand...

Agreed...then the voice morphing technology should be used to call the Alex Jones show using the voice of Dylan Avery to see if it fools him. (or vice versa)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom