• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Does Randi know what this guy is saying about him?

OMG, that's FUNNY! :dl:

So THAT'S the guy Zammit is threatening with legal action for "defacing his website"! The way he was carrying on, I thought his site had been hijacked and turned into a pornography page or something!
 
One has to wonder. Does Zammit do himself a favor by acting like that? I wonder.

The problem, of course, is that the loonies get the press, and the press doesn't get the facts.
 
jmercer said:
This Zammit guy's really got it bad for Randi ...
Click to expand...

Check out this correction he requests Mr. Randi perform to his offer ...

"that the offerer not be anywhere where the psychic phenomenon is being demonstrated. This is because the offeror is technically an intruding negative extraneous variable and will inevitably make nugatory otherwise successful psychic tests - he exudes too much negativity for sensitives to operate properly."

Now, I admit I'm not the most fluent user of the English language, but just when was the last time you used the word nugatory in a sentense?
 
Re: Re: Does Randi know what this guy is saying about him?

Just thinking said:
Now, I admit I'm not the most fluent user of the English language, but just when was the last time you used the word nugatory in a sentense?
Click to expand...
Perhaps you're more likely to use nugatory once you've transcended the boggle threshold? (See the Jenny Smedley article)
 
BillyJoe said:
Please kill this thread about Australia's greatest embarassment.
Click to expand...

... and keep in mind, this guy's a lawer -- which means somewhere someone's legal rights are depending on him. (My advice to the poor soul, plead guilty by reason of insanity. Only a crazy person would choose Zammit to represent him.)
 
Just thinking said:
Only a crazy person would choose Zammit to represent him.
Click to expand...
Unless your position was completely untenable.
He would then be a shoe in for the job. :D
 
Re: Re: Does Randi know what this guy is saying about him?

Psiload said:
Not nearly as bad as this Victor Dammit guy...

http://www.aaskolnick.com/dammit/
Click to expand...

That is realy funny... I am yeat to read more of it :)

... and keep in mind, this guy's a lawer -- which means somewhere someone's legal rights are depending on him. (My advice to the poor soul, plead guilty by reason of insanity. Only a crazy person would choose Zammit to represent him.)
Click to expand...

btw Victor was my Corporate Law teacher at TAFE (collage) and I must say he wasn't a bad teacher and knew his law. He was a bit weird, but to us half of the teachers were weird... :) To bad at that time I didn't know of his website.. I could have debated with him about that... :)
 
Re: Re: Re: Does Randi know what this guy is saying about him?

badnews said:
I could have debated with him about that... :)
Click to expand...
You can still try, cannot you?
 
Someone apply just to reset his counter.

You know the drill, hem and haw, stall, delay, make excuses.
 
Re: Re: Does Randi know what this guy is saying about him?

Just thinking said:
Now, I admit I'm not the most fluent user of the English language, but just when was the last time you used the word nugatory in a sentense?
Click to expand...

Noun: "Nuggat."
Verb: ""Noogie."
Adjective: "Nugatory."
Adverb: "Nugatively."

Oh, and that's "sentence."

;)
 
jmercer said:
This Zammit guy's really got it bad for Randi:

http://www.victorzammit.com/skeptics/index.html
Click to expand...

The guy appears to be a fracking lunatic (though I'm not a psychiatrist, so that's just my opinion based upon the evidence of his web site only); Goddess only knows what kind of clients this apparently insane lawyer must get.

John Edward has really puzzled the closed minded skeptics. I am taping John Edward's CROSSING OVER everyday - it is being shown two and at times three times a day on FOXTEL - and some 600 television stations inside and outside the United States. I suggest that the debunkers obtain the services of a neutral, independent professional statistician and ask him/her what the mathematical probability is of John Edward obtaining the information he claims he is getting by chance. Then ask the statistician to take into consideration a cumulative month's viewing: the result? Unequivocally, trillions to one! Translated, this means John Edward IS getting his information from those who crossed over. This evidence is consistent with 23 other areas of evidence for the afterlife.
Click to expand...

That has already been done, several times. Edward's score: less than my batting average, and I'm a near-blind clutz who couldn't bat a ball if my life depended upon it.

Note that this apparently insane individual mentions what the mathematical probability is of John Edward obtaining the information he claims he is getting by chance. Who the bloody hell said anything about "chance" being involved? Edward's victims feed Edward with all the "information" Edward spews.

As a lawyer, this guy would make an excellent post hole digger.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom