Did FEMA recently report temperatures of 2700 degrees F at GZ?

Homeland Insurgency said:
no 110 story building has EVER been brought down by building content fire. EVER


no steel contructed high-rise building PERIOD has ever suffered a global collapse by building content fire


and no building content fire reaction has ever produced molten metal for weeks afterwards


there you go
Click to expand...

No 110-story building as ever collapsed at all prior to 9/11, regardless of the cause. The argument that a unique event couldn't have occurred because it's never occurred before is beyond stupid.

Homeland Insurgency said:
learning anything yet?
Click to expand...

Yes.

I've learned that according to your logic the Twin Towers didn't actually collapse.
 
johnny karate said:
No 110-story building as ever collapsed at all prior to 9/11, regardless of the cause. The argument that a unique event couldn't have occurred because it's never occurred before is beyond stupid. Yes. I've learned that according to your logic the Twin Towers didn't actually collapse.
Click to expand...

Rubbing your nose in your own stinky argument doesn't smell very good does it Johnny?

But do you learn?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
no 110 story building has EVER been brought down by building content fire. EVER


no steel contructed high-rise building PERIOD has ever suffered a global collapse by building content fire


and no building content fire reaction has ever produced molten metal for weeks afterwards


there you go


learning anything yet?
Click to expand...

Yes I have. It happens by reading and comprehending all the posts and visiting links from people who actually know what they're talking about.

Try it some time.

You're welcome. :rolleyes:
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Rubbing your nose in your own stinky argument doesn't smell very good does it Johnny?
Click to expand...

Actually, there is no way you could possibly rub my nose in my "own stinky argument" because that's never happened before, and according to you, things that have never happened before can't possibly happen.

Also, since you never actually said those words before, you didn't just say them now, so your post I quoted above never actually happened.
 
UNLoVedRebel said:
Let me rephrase what I think he's trying to say, in the form of a question. How stupid does the hypothesis have to be for it to be thrown in the "ridiculous" category. Is the possibility of nuclear weapons felling the towers worth investigating, or is even considering a waste of time? How about Judy Wood's energy beam theory? How about the yet to be discovered "thermate cutter charge?" What crosses the line between worth investigating and waste of time because it's so ridiculous?
Click to expand...

Well look here. The debunkers tried to gang up thinking that if they get the last word in it actually means something. Just more delusional for their delusional world.

I wasn't the one to bring up thermite.

I never mentioned nuclear weapons.

I never mentioned energy beams.

I brought up building content fire.

Why does that scare you?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Well look here. The debunkers tried to gang up thinking that if they get the last word in it actually means something. Just more delusional for their delusional world.

I wasn't the one to bring up thermite.

I never mentioned nuclear weapons.

I never mentioned energy beams.

I brought up building content fire.

Why does that scare you?
Click to expand...

It doesn't "scare" me at all. Any moron can set markers for "first time in history". It won't contribute to our understanding of the collapse. It's just one more tactic the truthers use to tap dance around their kooky multi-hyoptheses.
 
UNLoVedRebel said:
It doesn't "scare" me at all. Any moron can set markers for "first time in history". It won't contribute to our understanding of the collapse. It's just one more tactic the truthers use to tap dance around their kooky multi-hyoptheses.
Click to expand...

I'm not the one with the kooky multi-hyoptheses. I never put one forward.

You on the other hand claim to know what happened on 9/11. That's how you keep painting yourself into a corner where I can make fun of you.

And I'm having a lot of fun. That's why I come here. It's a lot of fun.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
I'm not the one with the kooky multi-hyoptheses. I never put one forward.

You on the other hand claim to know what happened on 9/11. That's how you keep painting yourself into a corner where I can make fun of you.
Click to expand...

I certainly hope I know what happened on 9/11; it's not that hard to figure out. You seem to have no interest in the events of that tragic day. I'm sorry you have such a lack of respect for the truth.
 
UNLoVedRebel said:
I certainly hope I know what happened on 9/11; it's not that hard to figure out. You seem to have no interest in the events of that tragic day. I'm sorry you have such a lack of respect for the truth.
Click to expand...

It's not hard to figure out? So what took so long? I'm sorry you have so much respect for authority. Or is it denial?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
I'm not the one with the kooky multi-hyoptheses. I never put one forward.

.
Click to expand...

Yelling "9-11 was an inside job" is accusing the United States government of being involved in the terror attacks of 9-11. It assumes a conclusion to a "new investigation" that has yet to take place.

Truthers constanly yell about the government deciding who was responsible for 9-11 before there was an investigation.

Yet truthers are doing the exact same thing, without a "proper investigation".
 
Last edited:
Homeland Insurgency said:
That's why we are all here. The investigations into 9/11 have gone nowhere.

You don't know what happened on 9/11. Stop pretending like you do.
Click to expand...

Dude. WE know what happened on 9-11. Most of the world knows what happened on 9-11. If 9-11 truthers choose to DENY what happened that day..that is their problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom