Did FEMA recently report temperatures of 2700 degrees F at GZ?

no 110 story building has EVER been brought down by building content fire. EVER


no steel contructed high-rise building PERIOD has ever suffered a global collapse by building content fire


and no building content fire reaction has ever produced molten metal for weeks afterwards


there you go

No 110-story building as ever collapsed at all prior to 9/11, regardless of the cause. The argument that a unique event couldn't have occurred because it's never occurred before is beyond stupid.

learning anything yet?

Yes.

I've learned that according to your logic the Twin Towers didn't actually collapse.
 
No 110-story building as ever collapsed at all prior to 9/11, regardless of the cause. The argument that a unique event couldn't have occurred because it's never occurred before is beyond stupid. Yes. I've learned that according to your logic the Twin Towers didn't actually collapse.

Rubbing your nose in your own stinky argument doesn't smell very good does it Johnny?

But do you learn?
 
no 110 story building has EVER been brought down by building content fire. EVER


no steel contructed high-rise building PERIOD has ever suffered a global collapse by building content fire


and no building content fire reaction has ever produced molten metal for weeks afterwards


there you go


learning anything yet?

Yes I have. It happens by reading and comprehending all the posts and visiting links from people who actually know what they're talking about.

Try it some time.

You're welcome. :rolleyes:
 
Rubbing your nose in your own stinky argument doesn't smell very good does it Johnny?

Actually, there is no way you could possibly rub my nose in my "own stinky argument" because that's never happened before, and according to you, things that have never happened before can't possibly happen.

Also, since you never actually said those words before, you didn't just say them now, so your post I quoted above never actually happened.
 
Let me rephrase what I think he's trying to say, in the form of a question. How stupid does the hypothesis have to be for it to be thrown in the "ridiculous" category. Is the possibility of nuclear weapons felling the towers worth investigating, or is even considering a waste of time? How about Judy Wood's energy beam theory? How about the yet to be discovered "thermate cutter charge?" What crosses the line between worth investigating and waste of time because it's so ridiculous?

Well look here. The debunkers tried to gang up thinking that if they get the last word in it actually means something. Just more delusional for their delusional world.

I wasn't the one to bring up thermite.

I never mentioned nuclear weapons.

I never mentioned energy beams.

I brought up building content fire.

Why does that scare you?
 
Well look here. The debunkers tried to gang up thinking that if they get the last word in it actually means something. Just more delusional for their delusional world.

I wasn't the one to bring up thermite.

I never mentioned nuclear weapons.

I never mentioned energy beams.

I brought up building content fire.

Why does that scare you?

It doesn't "scare" me at all. Any moron can set markers for "first time in history". It won't contribute to our understanding of the collapse. It's just one more tactic the truthers use to tap dance around their kooky multi-hyoptheses.
 
It doesn't "scare" me at all. Any moron can set markers for "first time in history". It won't contribute to our understanding of the collapse. It's just one more tactic the truthers use to tap dance around their kooky multi-hyoptheses.

I'm not the one with the kooky multi-hyoptheses. I never put one forward.

You on the other hand claim to know what happened on 9/11. That's how you keep painting yourself into a corner where I can make fun of you.

And I'm having a lot of fun. That's why I come here. It's a lot of fun.
 
I'm not the one with the kooky multi-hyoptheses. I never put one forward.

You on the other hand claim to know what happened on 9/11. That's how you keep painting yourself into a corner where I can make fun of you.

I certainly hope I know what happened on 9/11; it's not that hard to figure out. You seem to have no interest in the events of that tragic day. I'm sorry you have such a lack of respect for the truth.
 
I certainly hope I know what happened on 9/11; it's not that hard to figure out. You seem to have no interest in the events of that tragic day. I'm sorry you have such a lack of respect for the truth.

It's not hard to figure out? So what took so long? I'm sorry you have so much respect for authority. Or is it denial?
 
I'm not the one with the kooky multi-hyoptheses. I never put one forward.

.

Yelling "9-11 was an inside job" is accusing the United States government of being involved in the terror attacks of 9-11. It assumes a conclusion to a "new investigation" that has yet to take place.

Truthers constanly yell about the government deciding who was responsible for 9-11 before there was an investigation.

Yet truthers are doing the exact same thing, without a "proper investigation".
 
Last edited:
That's why we are all here. The investigations into 9/11 have gone nowhere.

You don't know what happened on 9/11. Stop pretending like you do.

Dude. WE know what happened on 9-11. Most of the world knows what happened on 9-11. If 9-11 truthers choose to DENY what happened that day..that is their problem.
 

Back
Top Bottom