• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

"Defend Science" statement looking for signatures

Skeptic Ginger

Nasty Woman
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
96,955
Editorial: Wise words in defense of seeking wisdom
That those heresies of yesteryear are now mainstays of modern thinking seems to have cast little light -- for many of today's scientific breakthroughs are waved away with the same breezy disregard that dismissed gravity as "only a theory." Indeed, even long-established science is getting the boot: A century and a half after its unveiling, scriptural literalists are laughing off Charles Darwin's theory that contemporary species evolved through natural selection over millions of years. Sidestepping an avalanche of evidence reinforcing Darwinian theory, its critics are pushing with worrisome success for public-school teaching of "intelligent design" -- a fairy tale that hardly qualifies as a theory.

This resistance to scientific scholarship is driven by fundamentalist believers, who've found quite a friend in President Bush. The president might be excused for showing sympathy to his most conservative allies. But when doing so entails snubbing a commonplace of biology like evolution -- which even Catholic schools teach without blinking -- something is very much awry.

And that flap is just the start. On a vast array of issues -- climate change, reproductive health, sex education, stem-cell research, environmental degradation and loads of others -- the policies of the U.S. government flout scientific fact in favor of wishful thinking.

This is no way to run a society -- and America's scientists are gearing up to say so.
Go to the link to add your name if you are interested.

I signed up with the group a while back. I get an occasional email from them.
 
AFAIK, there are no qualifications needed to sign. If you have credentials, fine, but there are people from all walks of life on the list. And "Mother of three" is a credential as far as I'm concerned. They do say in the intro
The Defend Science Statement aims to rally broad opposition and resistance to the mounting attacks on science and scientific thinking which are unfolding in the United States. Our basic aim now is to run the Defend Science Statement, signed by scientists, as an ad in major newspapers, reaching millions. (At this point the Statement is signed by over 1800 scientists and members of the scientific community.) sign the statement...
But I believe the list grew beyond that. Perhaps if they are taking out newspaper ads and space/money becomes an issue they will vet the list.

Thanks for putting the other link, it seems the one directly from the article isn't working now.

No, it isn't like the Project Steve scientist list. It is more like the Union of Concerned Scientists. I believe the difference is in activities. This group is specifically supporting science itself whereas the Union of Concerned Scientists takes on more specific areas of concern.

FYI, Project Steve grew from the IDers claim they had x number of scientists backing their nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Nice to see a decent bit of writing in the Star Trib. There's so much woo around here it's hard to find the good stuff.

I signed my name also.
 

Back
Top Bottom