• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Debunking Richard Gage

Resolver

Scholar
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
112
Can someone point to some links that list and respond to each of Richard Gage's assertions?

Two of the ones I heard and am interested in:

1) WTC towers fell at about 2/3 free-fall speed. This couldn't have been result of just the momentum of the pile-driver, which broke apart.

2) Thermite evidence (eg iron rich spheres).

Thanks!
 
Should change the title, because the thermite "evidence", DOES NOT BELONG to Richard Gage. The other evidence is not his either.

Debunking Richard Gage is debunking the same, tired, lame truther canards from 2006. He is nothing more then a parrot of those talking points, adding nothing new despite his alleged "authority" as an architect.

If you want Gage debunked, simply pull out a couple of the canards, go to google, and cross ref then with "JREF".

TAM:)
 
Can someone point to some links that list and respond to each of Richard Gage's assertions?

Two of the ones I heard and am interested in:

1) WTC towers fell at about 2/3 free-fall speed. This couldn't have been result of just the momentum of the pile-driver, which broke apart.

Thanks!

It would be helpful if your questions did not rely on assumptions that violate the fundamental laws of physics.

No thank you truther!
 
Can someone point to some links that list and respond to each of Richard Gage's assertions?

Two of the ones I heard and am interested in:

1) WTC towers fell at about 2/3 free-fall speed. This couldn't have been result of just the momentum of the pile-driver, which broke apart.

2) Thermite evidence (eg iron rich spheres).

Thanks!

I suggest you try something called a "search" function. Either on the internet or even just on this thread, as there is a little button on the scroll bar above explicitly with this function. It helps to answer questions like this.

I am glad that there are as many debunkers as truthers that don't understand this function, as it is the only thing that keeps these debates going.

I suggest you go to the thread called Richard Gage Q&A for the 2009 version of the same question.
 
1) WTC towers fell at about 2/3 free-fall speed. This couldn't have been result of just the momentum of the pile-driver, which broke apart.

This is an assumption that an under-educated doofus pulled out of his underwear. The collapses were due to floors breaking under added weigh, one after the other. It takes a bit of time for sufficient weight to build up on each floor, but not a great deal of time.

CD puts the entire building into motion. Only one floor at a time joined the cascade.

2) Thermite evidence (eg iron rich spheres).

The sphereules are wleding fume. They cotain iron and manganese because they were formed by a torch melting structural steel which is an alloy of iron and manganese. They contain calcium, potassium, aluminum and silicon and occassionally zinc and chromium because the steel being welded was coated with paint which usually contains kaolin (calcium/aluminum silicate with occassional inclusions of potassium,) zinc chromate pigments and iron oxide pigments.

Steven Jones' red chips have different chemical make ups. So do the paints on the columns, pipes, office furniture and some workers' personnal affects.

Jones and Gage are both selling balloon juice.
 
This is an assumption that an under-educated doofus pulled out of his underwear. The collapses were due to floors breaking under added weigh, one after the other. It takes a bit of time for sufficient weight to build up on each floor, but not a great deal of time.

CD puts the entire building into motion. Only one floor at a time joined the cascade.



The sphereules are wleding fume. They cotain iron and manganese because they were formed by a torch melting structural steel which is an alloy of iron and manganese. They contain calcium, potassium, aluminum and silicon and occassionally zinc and chromium because the steel being welded was coated with paint which usually contains kaolin (calcium/aluminum silicate with occassional inclusions of potassium,) zinc chromate pigments and iron oxide pigments.

Steven Jones' red chips have different chemical make ups. So do the paints on the columns, pipes, office furniture and some workers' personnal affects.

Jones and Gage are both selling balloon juice.

Great, thank you.

I suggest you try something called a "search" function. Either on the internet or even just on this thread, as there is a little button on the scroll bar above explicitly with this function. It helps to answer questions like this.

I am glad that there are as many debunkers as truthers that don't understand this function, as it is the only thing that keeps these debates going.

I suggest you go to the thread called Richard Gage Q&A for the 2009 version of the same question.

Yup, didn't notice the that "Richard Gage Q&A" thread or the "Search this thread" feature. Thanks!
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom