• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Debating the Loons

pomeroo

Banned
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
7,081
Debating the loons on 911researcher.com is a surreal experience. Check out this gem and my response. Note in particular the following:

"No plane crashed into the Pentagon
No plane crashed in Shanksville
No plane crashed into the Twin Towers.
FLIGHT 77 and FLIGHT 11 DID NOT EXIST IN THE BTS DATABASE AND THEREFORE DID NOT DEPART.
And here it is again for you:
The live feed of the second attack did not include a real plane either, but a CGI (Computer Generated Imagery).
http://911logic.blogspot.com
http://www.911tvfakery.net "



Gee, those flights didn't exist, but only a few very dumb guys sitting all day in front of their computer screens in their underwear were able to penetrate the deception.



Neocon Jihadist
Submitted by ewing2001 on Wed, 2006-12-27 02:38.
Wieck,
you complained that i called you a Neocon Jihadist.
First of all let me remind you and your pseudo intellectual outlet "AmericanThinker", that the original meaning of "Jihad" meant
nothing else than to 'lead a good Muslim life, praying and fasting regularly'.
That's for sure not what CIA asset Bin Laden and his set director behind the camera made out of it.
They called it a 'struggle for or defence of Islam', the so called holy war.
This is also the definition which was supported by the Albert Wohlstetter-Neocons,
including the AmericanThinker, which is nothing but an extended arm for other Neocon Nazi Propaganda and Watchtanks like i.e. campus-watch.org.
http://www.campus-watch.org/docs/publication/American+Thinker
Wieck himself also contributed to Campus-Watch.
http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/14286
Campus Watch was created by Daniel Pipes directly after 9/11 to silence
MIT dupes like Noam Chomsky and the complete U.S. University Apparatus.
Noone of the alleged intellectual left wing complained about this.
Explanation: The intellectual left wing basically doesn't exist anymore,
because compromised by dirty money of CIA front Ford Foundation and other
control engines.
The alleged intellectual right wing had similar effects with infiltrated input from
Brookings Institution and others, who betrayed the PaleoConservatives.
It was also Daniel Pipes, who started a propaganda campaign against the so called
"Green Peril", right after the first false flag operation on the Twin Towers, in 1993.
Between 1993 and 2001, almost every article about Green Peril and the alleged rising
terror threats from the Islam can be traced back to the same dozen of pseudo journalists,
among them Daniel Pipes, John Miller (ABC), and a couple of ex-CIA employees like Vince Cannistraro and others.
Interestingly it was also the same propaganda tandem Miller-Cannistraro, who did the last
official interview with Laden in 1998.
Coincidence or just luck?
What Butterbrain Wieck also ignores is, that almost *EVERYTHING* what changed after 9/11,
was already a done deal *BEFORE* 9/11.
It therefore doesn't make much sense to keep the myth of the whining false opposition of the so called leftwing alive.
The constructed 'Bush-America Hatred' is another red herring used by butterhead Wieck as a straw to escape from physical evidence of TV Fakery and Controlled Demolition.
Here is a fact sheet for you:
-President Clinton approved the Homeland Security between 1999 and 2001, established by ANSER.
-all details of the 9/11 attacks had been drilled and exercised *before* 9/11, including a plane crash scenario into the Pentagon, the anthrax attack (as in "Dark Winter", June 2001), an aircraft hijack (the last one was drilled 2 weeks prior 9/11 in Buffalo, NY).
-the Patriot Act itself was written before 9/11
-the War against Afghanistan and Iraq planned and partly exercised
The so called "Jihad" on 9/11 however took not place, only in the butterbrain of Wieck.
No plane crashed into the Pentagon
No plane crashed in Shanksville
No plane crashed into the Twin Towers.
FLIGHT 77 and FLIGHT 11 DID NOT EXIST IN THE BTS DATABASE AND THEREFORE DID NOT DEPART.
And here it is again for you:
The live feed of the second attack did not include a real plane either, but a CGI (Computer Generated Imagery).
http://911logic.blogspot.com
http://www.911tvfakery.net
Though you ignored so far to compare all footage from the hits, the facts will not go away.
It is furthermore impossible that any aircraft is able to butter into a building without any walls crumbling, parts breaking apart and other logical physical reaction.
(as seen in non-live footage.
Reminder: No live feed showed any object entering into any building, but vanishing behind, which was easier for a CGI live trick)
It is impossible, that the steel construction of the Twin Towers came down without an input of conventional and unconventional weaponry, to allow a physical violation of the Resistance- and Free Fall Theory.
Wieck possibly thinks, this is all an exciting game.
(He used to write for various chess and gaming magazines).
But reality is, that Wieck and other intellectuals betrayed the United States and apparently *they are* the ones, who hate America, by allowing it to be destroyed by Bogus War on Terror Propaganda and a destabilization of the US$.
The White House doesn't exist any more since a long time.
It's all in the hand of privatized military and -intelligence, supervised by transnational fascist bankers.
The U.S. Constitution was thrown into the garbage can by neocon puppets and their gatekeeper media alliance of butterhead sheeples like Wieck and Co.
Wieck's close association with Daniel Pipes furthermore could suggest a CIA affiliation.
His father Richard Pipes was a member of the Committee on Present Danger from 1977 until 1992 and served on the Council of Foreign Relations.
He also was mainly responsible for the so called "Team-B Hoax" during the 70s.
TeamB, created by then CIA director George Bush, completely overexaggerated the threat of the Soviet Union.
The TeamB Fiasco also included an overstate of the USSR's military and economic capabilities.
Do we smell a pattern?
Like the father, such the son and his phony
buddies Wieck + Co.
Wieck is a fraud, a butterhead and a traitor.
Wieck and his retards from AmericanThinker are most obviously running a 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Website, as correctly pointed out by SOUTHPARK, created by the U.S. Government itself.
But it is nice of him of giving 911researchers.com an exclusive analysis of his brain functions which spits amazing fruitloop drivel like "no demolition experts anywhere think explosives were used to bring down WTC 1 and 2."
With this nonsense you might keep the orwellian 9/11 truthlings at 911blogger.com busy, but not 911researchers.com.
Interestingly it took only a few days after 9/11 when first demolition expert Van Romero came forward and declared that the collapse was "too methodical" to have resulted from the fires.
It was clearly controlled demolition for him.
Needless to say, under much pressure of neoconized politicians, -military and -media he had to retract from his statement, just 2 weeks later.

Fantasy Movement a Blend of Stupidity and Dishonesty
Submitted by Ronald Wieck on Wed, 2006-12-27 14:50.
To ewing2001,
Your stupidity and ignorance are breathtaking, even for a conspiracy liar.
You can "remind" me of as much nonsense as you wish, but you're still a sciolist. The meaning of jihad has evolved over the centuries. Today, radical Islam stresses the martial aspects over the spiritual. At the beheading of Nicholas Berg in 2004, al Zarqawi said: "Is it not time for you [Muslims] to take the path of jihad and carry the sword of the Prophet of prophets?...The Prophet, the most merciful, ordered [his army] to strike the necks of some prisoners in [the battle of] Badr and to kill them...And he set a good example for us."
Osama bin Laden, as you understand perfectly well, has never been a CIA asset. You are lying. Anyway, I thought he doesn't exist. If he does, you have touched the third rail for conspiracy liars. If there is a real bin Laden, why doesn't he denounce the words put into his mouth by the fake bin Laden? If bin Laden is dead, why didn't the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy stave off last month's disastrous election defeat by announcing that the bogeyman had been killed? I realize that none of this occurred to you, and for an excellent reason: you are a dimwit. Take your time figuring it out.
The American Thinker is an online journal that publishes articles reflecting a broad range of conservative thought. It is by no stretch of the imagination a neocon outlet.
My only contact with Daniel Pipes has been to send him a comment about the perpetuation of Gary Sick's 'October Surprise' myth in the 8th edition of the textbook, 'Rise to Globalism,' by Stephen Ambrose and Douglas Brinkley. Your insinuation that I am a "contributor" to his project is an example of either your incompetence or dishonesty (most likely a combination of both). "Wieck's close association with Daniel Pipes furthermore could suggest a CIA affiliation." Gee, I wonder why rationalists regard conspiracy liars as morons?
The distinguished historian of Soviet Russia Richard Pipes did not "overestimate" the threat of that nation's unprecedented military buildup during the seventies and eighties. You are lying again.
Chomsky an MIT "dupe"? What can that possibly mean--that he might not hate America as much as you do? I assure you that he hates America as much as anyone; his IQ, unlike yours, consists of three digits, which restrains from making a complete horse's ass of himself. Let us acknowledge that he has come close to your standards in the past.
As I've stated here, it's time to give van Romero a rest: he regards you fantasists as total frauds.
"Reminder: No live feed showed any object entering into any building, but vanishing behind, which was easier for a CGI live trick)." Well, this one is a tough sell to the thousands who actually watched the second plane hit the WTC from nearby office windows. Incidentally, those videos sure as hell DO show a plane crashing into the building.
When you're reduced to fabricating such preposterous idiocy, why not admit that your insane house of cards has collapsed?
Oh, I almost forgot: Not a single demolition expert anywhere thinks that explosives were used to bring down WTC 1 and 2. None. Nobody.
 
Wow: Neocon Jihadist, butterbrain, traitor, sheep, CIA-affiliate, fraud!
He certainly doesn't like you!

Why do they so often use this style?

I just read the following on our favorite forum:
Yes, i think most people that sit on there PC all day long are either crippled, or really fat? Like Gravy? the ugliest fat **** i ever saw spewing government propaganda ********!

LC Forum
How about Gravy, and myself, and the guy from pumpitout.com get together for a debate. It wouldn't be civil like with the LTW boys.I'm ready to yell and scream the proof. I would love Mark roberts too. PM has been debunked. And anybody that takes the 9/11 commision for what they tell you, is a shill or a zombie with breathing abilities. I will gladly join in on a debate. The LTW guys don't have the debating skills that they need to get points across. I know your reading this you fat, ugly piece of ****. We will take you down hard. I only say this because i cant get approved to become a member on their site. Forget 9/11, lets see what you think about "the real world". Once you undersatand the real world, you will understand 9/11.

LC Forum
That one doesn't like Gravy. :)

(Actually, it is not funny at all.)
 
First of all let me remind you and your pseudo intellectual outlet "AmericanThinker", that the original meaning of "Jihad" meant
nothing else than to 'lead a good Muslim life, praying and fasting regularly'. That's for sure not what CIA asset Bin Laden and his set director behind the camera made out of it.

Sweet merciful crap!
 
It gets better..............


Interesting idea for a debate. Send the contract right over.

You do work for WWDE, don't you?

Gotta run. I have a cestus match at 11, followed by class where we primally scream Hegel's Wissenschaft der Logik at each other.


(WorldWide Debating Entertainment)

Guess who? :D
 
Sweet merciful crap!

Yep. Despite that numerous Muslims, both the moderate ones and the extremists all view Jihad as "struggle" or holy war, they try their best to go against all of that.

These people don't live in reality whatsoever.
 
Holy Guacamole...

That fella is absolutely obsessed with you, beyond the point of paranoia.

South Park is a government conspiracy?

That's a good one.

Writing for chess magazines proves that a man is planning to destroy our biggest buildings?

So what happened to all the passengers and crew of the planes, and how did they do such a fantastic job of faking their last, panic-stricken phone calls? I'd like to meet these sound-effects guys. :boggled:
 
Ron Wieck is an occasional contributer to American Butterhead magazine. (Bonus points to anyone with the time and inclination to Photoshop a magazine cover)

That crazy Ewing2001 is Nico Haupt, in case people couldn't tell by his unique turns of phrase.
 
(snip)
So what happened to all the passengers and crew of the planes, and how did they do such a fantastic job of faking their last, panic-stricken phone calls? I'd like to meet these sound-effects guys. :boggled:

I worked with a foil-hat who claimed that they were taken off the planes, loaded onto other planes, flown to Florida and euthanized.
 
Correction

:mad: Jee-sus! I write for 'American BUTThead' magazine. Can't you people ever get it right?
 
:mad: Jee-sus! I write for 'American BUTThead' magazine. Can't you people ever get it right?

I was wondering why you'd want to wear butter on your head! But still, that would make more sense than the stuff the loons bring here.
 
The Great Debate continues:

Wieck hates America
Submitted by ewing2001 on Wed, 2006-12-27 18:04.
Wieck,
i am not sure why your butterbrain is grasping for
archaic words, if you want to escape from an argument.
If it comes to sciolism, it appears to be Wieck,
who has no clue, how digital century works.
Neither he wants to win an argument, but instead is using the simple constructions of a fruitloop debate, which undermines his paperwork from College.
Maybe that's where his 2-digit number of IQ is based on, which tries to desperately reach the 3-digits on this forum *here* ;
Wieck represents a superficial knowledge per excellence
and is trapped in the same net of reality tv and digital trickery
like most of his other pseudo intellectual sheeple.
You tried desperately to express that i am a 'liar',
but instead responded with own lies.
Let's go through the silly list of Wiecks paranoid fantasies:
Lie No.1:
"Bin Laden didn't work for the CIA".
A bold lie.
Afghan resistance against Soviet Troops including Taliban was backed by the intelligence services of the United States and Saudi Arabia.
Fuerthermore the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), officially also affiliated with Bin Laden, was a hub of MPRI itself a front of Department of Defense AND the CIA as a military- and intelligence contractor.
MPRI (Military Professional Resources Incorporated) was founded in 1987 by eight ex-officers of the U.S. Army.
The firm was aquired by L-3 Communications in June 2000, which also bought WESCAM, the very same military camera system, who filmed the live hits of the South Tower, which were additionally added with a CGI, impostering an aircraft silhouette.
MPRI, also sub-contracted some of their training programme to two British private security companies, ensuring that between 1998 and June 1999 the KLA was being armed, trained and assisted in Italy, Turkey, Kosovo and Germany by the Americans, the German external intelligence service and former and serving members of Britain’s 22 SAS Regiment.
On that matter, Bin Laden was therefore not only a CIA asset, but obviously close to at least 4 other intelligence agencies as well.
The myth of a half dead and half alive Bin Laden is useful for the Orwellian brain machinery of fascist war profiteers.
It is of further irrelevance, because UBL had nothing to do with the military opration of 9/11!
The dimwit is you, not me.
This also makes sense for a butterhead. Wet brains, flat head.
The only problem is you don't run a dynasty, but lacking of self-confidence of being a lousy employeee of some gruftie-gothic tv show, which looks worse than the highest qualities of PBS in the 80s and a wannabee thinker-magazine, which is nothing but a cheap blogzine to give Wieck some egos which he cannot build elsewhere (with exceptions of other silly escapades at Buzzflash and Co.).
Maybe it's Wieck, who should grow up.
Wasting time with Buzzflash appears to me like a desperate trip of Wieck
keeping up with wannabee leftie geeks, where there aren't any.
Buzzflash is *the* leftgatekeeper portal no.1 and Wieck is revealing himself as a fraud by showing up over there.
Wieck's lie No.2:
"The meaning of jihad has evolved over the centuries".
It hasn't. It is still the same original translation.
Wieck is paraphrasing the thinshit of NY Post, Brookings Institute, his buddy Daniel Pipes and other neocon nazi propagandists.
Wieck's lie No.3:
"At the beheading of Nicholas Berg in 2004, al Zarqawi said..."
Wieck is using a claim, which is based on a video, which not only ironically pointed on the location of Abu Ghraib, but also an actor,
which had nothing to do with al Zarqawi, since this was clearly a phantom and yet another fantasy figure of illusionalists like Homeland Security and Co.
The real Zarqawi was obviously dead or killed several times before the production of this reality tv video.
Wieck's lie No.3:
"..The distinguished historian of Soviet Russia Richard Pipes did not "overestimate" the threat of that nation's unprecedented military buildup during the seventies and eighties..."
Wieck can continue to dream but the irrational brain of the Pipes family was analysed by a huge crowd of historians. The threat was overexaggerated on purpose. "TeamB" was a fraud!
Wieck's lie No.4:
"...he might not hate America as much as you do?.."
I have no clue, where you get this obsession.
I love America. I love NYC. I have my own music and film fascination
based on my afairs with America.
I possibly know more about these things than your butterbrain.
My great-grandfather immigrated into America, my grandfather was born in Illinois.
Wieck hates America, because it couldn't give him the same job, his mentors Daniel Pipes and Albert Wohlstetter received.
Or becoming CEO at Lockheed or L3-Communication.
Instead butterhead Wieck's handlers gave him a digital slavery job, showing up at websites he don't like, writing at blogzines which noone knows and noone cares about (AmericanThinker) or working in gruftie tv shows ("Hardfire"), which do not even have enough money for professional lighting.
Hardfire?
I would rename it into ColdWater. Every time when i have to follow sleeping pills like you i fall asleep.
But maybe that was the purpose of LooseChange to show up in your special k department.
And Wieck has to continue to hate America.
Because it gives him bad tv shows and bad special effects on 9/11 :)
Wieck's lie No.5:
"it's time to give van Romero a rest: he regards you fantasists as total frauds"
Another lie, not even backed up by any quote.
Furthermore what Romero states or thinks right now, is of no relevance, since his original quote still stands.
But i agree with butterhead Wieck. It doesn't need to have a specialist to figure what every third grader would notice:
The evidence of controlled demolition, with additional use of exotic weaponry to pulverize the building.
Facts for this evidence:
1. The free fall speed
2. That burning jet fuel cannot melt steel
3. That the original claim was that the steel melted, and after this was ridiculed, the official story was changed and they now deny that they ever claimed it.
4. The pulverization of the concrete.
5. That asymmetrical damage cannot cause a symmetrical collapse over that distance.
6. That no steel framed skyscraper has ever before collapsed in such a manner.
7.That there is no evidence of a hot fire
8. The resistance paradox - an even stronger proof than free fall by itself.
And here is another list where Wieck tries to escape and fruitloop from:
No plane crashed into the Pentagon
No plane crashed in Shanksville
No plane crashed into the Twin Towers.
FLIGHT 77 and FLIGHT 11 DID NOT EXIST IN THE BTS DATABASE AND THEREFORE DID NOT DEPART.
And here it is again for you:
The live feed of the second attack did not include a real plane either, but a CGI (Computer Generated Imagery).
http://911logic.blogspot.com
http://www.911tvfakery.net
Though you ignored so far to compare all footage from the hits, the facts will not go away.
It is furthermore impossible that any aircraft is able to butter into a building without any walls crumbling, parts breaking apart and other logical physical reaction.
(as seen in non-live footage.
Reminder: No live feed showed any object entering into any building, but vanishing behind, which was easier for a CGI live trick.

More Drivel from a Conspiracy Liar
Submitted by Ronald Wieck on Wed, 2006-12-27 18:46.
You'll have much better success conning the dunces here than attempting the same shabby tricks with anyone who has taken the trouble to investigate the claims you charlatans make:
"Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."
Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors-clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research institute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years." - Van D. Romero, Ph.D. in Physics
http://infohost.nmt.edu/~red/van.html
Another of your thoroughly debunked falsehoods cannot be rescued by a bigger dose of snake oil. Afghani mujahideen relied heavily on American funding. Foreign fighters were funded by Saudi sources. Osama has stated many times in videos and on al Jazeera that he would never accept, under any circumstances, aid from the United States. Your transparent fabrications impress only ignorant fools.
The bin Laden problem has washed away the conspiracy liars' sand castle. He either exists or he does not. If he does, then why doesn't he repudiate the words of the actor (who, incidentally, looks EXACTLY like him)? If he doesn't, then why didn't the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy announce that he had been vaporized in a missile strike when the news would have provided an enormous boost for their evil schemes?
We noticed that you had no answer to this conundrum. Let me help: there is no conceivable answer. You have been exposed.
Incidentally, the meaning of jihad that you have invented does not accord with the practice of actual jihadists. Oh, I forgot: they don't exist. We just keep attacking ourselves.
You must stop your absurd prattling about my "handlers." Every few months, I host a tiny cable show as a favor to the producer. Call it a hobby. I am the "employee" of no one. You may not want to abandon this fairy tale, but you have no choice.
You mention my "mentor" Daniel Pipes. Mr. Pipes and I have never met, and do not know one another, providing redundant proof that you are a liar. Perhaps this is a companion to the fantasists' lie about the imaginary relationship between Ben Chertoff of Popular Mechanics magazine and Michael Chertoff.
Why do you waste everyone's time recycling the oldest, most discredited rubbish from the early days of the fantasy movement? Your free fall silliness has been debunked, well, everywhere. You might try debunking911.com or 911myths.com, for starters. Nobody ever said that the jet fuel MELTED the steel--another fantasist falsehood. The NIST report has explained the collapse mechanism in exhaustive detail. No real scientists dispute its conclusions.
Your fantastic nonsense about the Boeing aircraft that crashed into the WTC is too insane to consider. As I said, the thousands who watched from their office windows understand that you are off the deep end.
 
Of course...

I worked with a foil-hat who claimed that they were taken off the planes, loaded onto other planes, flown to Florida and euthanized.


So what happened to the bodies?

And how did they fake all the panic-stricken phone calls?

And why didn't they let Flight 93 whack its target, instead of faking the whole "passengers seizing the plane" routine? It would have been easier to fake.
 
Another thought....

The CTers are obsessed with the idea that because person A works for organization B, that organization B is person A's "handler," and that person A is a "puppet."

CTers have trouble understanding the differences between puppetry and loyalty.

That shows up in their own work, because they are very quick to denounce each other as government shills and traitors, and so on. They hate each other more than the NWO. In theory, they should be backing each other up.

They don't seem to understand loyalty as a concept, at all.
 
Of course...

Futuristic vocie-morphing technology silly!

What I want to know is, where did the get the phone numbers.

They got the phone numbers off the LUGS and phone bills.

If they were going to morph the voices, the least they could have done was make one of them like Jabba the Hutt. :D
 
They are always misrepresenting that database. It is not a mandated registration of every flight for legal reasons, it is the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, they track flights to see if they are on time. Given the events of the day, I don't think anyone was concerned as to whether the flights landed on schedule.
 
The conspiracy liars say this "vocie morphing technology" was developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory but I can't seem to find any confirmation of this or any other info.

Anyone have any more details?
 

Back
Top Bottom