catsmate
No longer the 1
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 34,767
An excellent choice, but it might get in the way of his wildlife work.David Attenborough is god. If we ever became a republic, he would win the president's job hands down.
I really wanted that boat to be called "Boaty McBoatface" as per the results of the public vote. Using Attenborough's name instead is the only thing the decision makers could have done to make me equally as happy.
I really wanted that boat to be called "Boaty McBoatface" as per the results of the public vote. Using Attenborough's name instead is the only thing the decision makers could have done to make me equally as happy.
I prefer "secular saint".David Attenborough is god.
I'm not one for using titles much, but for me he is always Sir David.
Never understood why it was his brother that got the big titled, not saying the lesser Attenborough wasn't a good actor and director but his achievements pall into almost insignificance compared to the greater Attenborough.
I agree. I wonder what would have happen if certain people had died at birth. The younger Attenborough would have easily have been replaced by someone else. But no one could have had the achievements David had. He was the force behind "Life on Earth" and several other great educational shows. Without him they would never had been made. I am sure they inspired many people to do different things.
A rational explanation can be found in the British Consitution. (Wow, "rational" and "British Constitution" in the same sentence. I never expected to do that.) Richard Attenborough was made a life-peer so he could sit in the House of Lords and look after the interests of the British film industry. That's the way these things have to be done in the UK. Quaint, isn't it?Never understood why it was his brother that got the big titled, not saying the lesser Attenborough wasn't a good actor and director but his achievements pall into almost insignificance compared to the greater Attenborough.