Creeps Crack, Gravy Gloats

Gotta love it. Yet another twoofer meltdown incident worthy of Wizard of Oz imagery...

1110345d3f21e8a7c8.jpg


"They're melllttting"
 
As pointed out by SLC, the Ground Zeros are at each others' throats.
Of course they are. Nothing not expected, it was always forseen.

You still got your ass whipped by Bermas. (yeah I know this lot here says different, but honestly even with that #**$*% of a host, who all but admitted to knowing it was an inside job, which you all missed, you still got done).

How's Canuck, Res?

ch_flagsmall.gif
 
Last edited:
Foti was on our side all along....

::shakes head::

Unbelievable. I feel bad for leaving him out of our excursions to O'Hara's now.
 
Of course they are. Nothing not expected, it was always forseen.

You still got your ass whipped by Bermas. (yeah I know this lot here says different, but honestly even with that #**$*% of a host, who all but admitted to knowing it was an inside job, which you all missed, you still got done).

How's Canuck, Res?
Please point out a claim that Bermas made that you believe is backed by evidence, and one I made that you believe is not backed by evidence. Thanks.
 
Foti was on our side all along....

::shakes head::

Unbelievable. I feel bad for leaving him out of our excursions to O'Hara's now.
Some of them were going out for pizza after a protest last month, and Foti asked if I wanted to come along. Swear to Ed! :eek:
 
Of course they are. Nothing not expected, it was always forseen.

You still got your ass whipped by Bermas. (yeah I know this lot here says different, but honestly even with that #**$*% of a host, who all but admitted to knowing it was an inside job, which you all missed, you still got done).

How's Canuck, Res?

[qimg]http://www.dorlingkindersley-uk.co.uk/static/cs/uk/11/worldfactfile/images/ch_flagsmall.gif[/qimg]

Again, I have to ask if cable news has ruined the fine art of debate. Where points are won or lost on whether you made a clear and concise point, not on who yells the loudest or gives the bes yo'momma joke.

"Troofers" keep asking for debates, but don't know what one is.
 
Some of them were going out for pizza after a protest last month, and Foti asked if I wanted to come along. Swear to Ed! :eek:
Why do I picture that scene being on par with a 6 year old's birthday party at Chuck E Cheese?
 
Please point out a claim that Bermas made that you believe is backed by evidence, and one I made that you believe is not backed by evidence. Thanks.

*Popcorn*

These are always good :)
 
The psychological makeup necessary to be a tr00ther precludes cooperation.
 
Gravy, are you sure that pizza wasn't in the trunk of a car on the way to a New Jersey pier and some freshly mixed cement? ;)
 
So is Tom Foti that weedy little bloke who kept calling Gravy "Baaaaby" during that little confrontation with Alex Jones? If so, I wouldn't have gone with him for pizza either.
 
Please answer Gravy's request. Post #5.

Seconded. We judge the 'winner' of that debate by whos claims were cooberated the most by what rational people would call evidence.

Perhaps we just have different critera for stuff like that, IronShot.

Explain why you think Gravy lost, IronSnot.
 
Who's the Dumbest of Them All?

[=IronSnot;2344166]Of course they are. Nothing not expected, it was always forseen.

You still got your ass whipped by Bermas. (yeah I know this lot here says different, but honestly even with that #**$*% of a host, who all but admitted to knowing it was an inside job, which you all missed, you still got done).

How's Canuck, Res?
http://www.dorlingkindersley-uk.co.uk/static/cs/uk/11/worldfactfile/images/ch_flagsmall.gif
[/quote]

Hi, Snotty. I'm that (expletive deleted) of a host who is always looking for the single Dumbest Conspiracy Liar out there. Competition is fierce, but you seem to be making a serious bid. I require more information.

When I "all but admitted to knowing it was an inside job," it is certainly true that everyone, including me, missed it. Can you tell us what exactly I know, and how I came to know it? You are entitled to bonus points if you provide a conceptual framework for Bermas's victory over Mark. Blithering incoherence and near-total ignorance trump facts: Show us how that works.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, can't be bothered watching it again.

My opinion, and I've said it here before, is that Bermas won, Gravy came a distant and petulant second, Dylan came a very quiet third and the host, whoever he was (on edit - ahh it's Pomeroo), won't be filling in for Letterman anytime soon.
 
pomeroo, it was the allegory you used. Quite obvious what you meant (ie you lost - get over it).

But I am not going to watch that pile of poo again. Under no circumstances.

edit - I think it was in Dylan's video of the event.
 
Sorry, can't be bothered watching it again.

My opinion, and I've said it here before, is that Bermas won, Gravy came a distant and petulant second, Dylan came a very quiet third and the host, whoever he was (on edit - ahh it's Pomeroo), won't be filling in for Letterman anytime soon.

Typical, you try and poison the well, get called on it and change subject.
 

Back
Top Bottom