I also find it interesting that even Pepsi realized the unethical nature of what Williams was doing, even though they stood to benefit almost unimaginably. Big props to the Pepsi corporate culture for that.
Psshh, someone probably did a cost benefit analysis.
I bet I can tell the difference between Pepsi and Cole 100% of the time... not even similar.Haven't studies showed that most people can't even determine the difference between Coke and most other similar soft-drinks? How much is that particular recipe even worth?
Haven't studies showed that most people can't even determine the difference between Coke and most other similar soft-drinks? How much is that particular recipe even worth?
I don't see anything in the article that says she stole the actual recipe for Coca-Cola itself, although it is pretty vague about what she did steal (which, since they are secrets, isn't a surprise). It says she took "confidential documents and samples of products that hadn't been launched by Coca-Cola." It sounds like a lot of what she took were plans for future products, not for products that are already on the market.
She stole something that belonged to a company that was so inconsiderate as to give her a job, and tried to sell it to her employer's competitor, believing it would be of such enormous value to that competitor that they would make her rich in exchange for the ill-gotten goods.
If she worked for a jeweler, and stole a million dollars worth of diamonds, would this seem like a harsh penalty? If Pepsi hadn't turned her in, but profited from the crime, to the point of taking a large market share advantage from Coke, and greatly devaluing the worth of millions of Coke stockholders, would it be any different?
No.Haven't studies showed that most people can't even determine the difference between Coke and most other similar soft-drinks?
Coca-Cola made over 24 billion dollars in revenues last year. I would imagine that the lion's share of that came from its flagship product.How much is that particular recipe even worth?