• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CIT.....Time to call it a day

What's that like the 5th or 6th smoking gun? You'd think they would have enough of these smoking guns to take someone to court no?
 
Par said:
There’s a spelling mistake there, LastChild. If you’re quick you can aid the truth movement immeasurably by seizing upon it.
Click to expand...

I don't think Mr. Hebert needs anymore help from me. He's doing wonders for debunkers everywhere all on his own. Is he a student of yours?
 
Jonnyclueless said:
What's that like the 5th or 6th smoking gun? You'd think they would have enough of these smoking guns to take someone to court no?
Click to expand...
Unfortunately they all seem to be pointed at the truthers' feet.
 
Last edited:
Yep, not one of you have anything of actual substance to contribute.
As for the "lack of responses" that's because the "duh-bunkers" haven't invented a lie for this one yet.
 
It takes substance to get substance. Just like any idiot can claim no one is presenting any substance. You come bring a topic that can even generate some substance for once, then we'll talk kid.
 
TC329 said:
Yep, not one of you have anything of actual substance to contribute.
As for the "lack of responses" that's because the "duh-bunkers" haven't invented a lie for this one yet.
Click to expand...

Well then. I suspect that this will be breaking on 20/20... when exactly? Aldo had informed me months ago that they were working on a mainstream news outlet and this new piece of hard-hitting, fact-laden, earth-shattering, smoking-gun evidence should only bolster the case.

So when can we expect, in the words of Margaret Cho, for people to "get really angry."?
 
TC329 said:
Yep, not one of you have anything of actual substance to contribute.
As for the "lack of responses" that's because the "duh-bunkers" haven't invented a lie for this one yet.
Click to expand...

Whatever TC. Well there is this:

'Well, I'm not really sure but I'd be guessing somewhere maybe between the USA Today building and, and National Airport.'."

"Well, I'm not really sure but I'd be guessing"

"I'm not really sure. . . I'd be guessing"

"not really sure. . . guessing."

Nice pathetic smoking gun. The whole damn quote is self debunking.

NEXT!
 
CIT call it a day?
Never.
It's too much fun playing Detective.

Besides, it'll only take a few more spammings on the Loose Change Forum for the whole World to marvel at his massive evidence.
Then he'll be the hero.
 
TC329 said:
Yep, not one of you have anything of actual substance to contribute.
As for the "lack of responses" that's because the "duh-bunkers" haven't invented a lie for this one yet.
Click to expand...

The bolded part is correct.
 
I opened up my rather liberal local news paper again today anticipating the '911 was an inside job' headlines to disappointment AGAIN today.

Thanks ALOT truth movement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom