• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CIT Doublespeak

realitybites

Graduate Poster
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,066
This is quite possibly the most elaborate and intricate tap-dance I've yet to see a truther perform.

To set the stage: In regards to the Pentagon, Dylan and LTW are now of the mind that "whatever hit the building is irrelevant. Why the building was hit is a much more important issue."

Let's disregard the obvious implications of that statement for a second.

Our good buddy Lyte Trip replies:
I agree with Dylan.

Exactly what caused the physical damage is not relevant just as it's not necessary to prove exactly what they used to bring down the towers.

But just like it can be proven that the collapse of the towers and building 7 were controlled demolitions it can also be proven that the plane did not cause the physical damage at the Pentagon.


We have provided hard evidence proving the low flying passenger jet that flew over Arlington on 9/11 could NOT have caused the physical damage starting with the light poles and ending with the alleged c-ring exit hole.

The north side claim is not a "theory".

It is irrefutable evidence unless you are willing to claim that all of these individuals simultaneously hallucinated the exact same opposite of reality.

To summarize.... It's irrelevant to prove what hit the Pentagon and what brought down the towers even though it's been proven that the towers were controlled demolition and that no plane hit the Pentagon.

Following that line of thinking, all those Forensic Files shows would go off the air, autopsies would be irrelevant, and CBS' ratings would tank after CSI, CSI New York, CSI Miami, CSI Springfield, CSI Buffalo, CSI Anaheim, and CSI Peoria are all cancelled for lack of relevancy.

After all... we've proven John Doe is dead. How he died is completely irrelevant.
 
See, this is why I think Dylan is indeed a smart cookie. He KNOWS he can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that no plane hit the Pentagon, or that the WTC was a controlled demo. But what he can do...with much certainty, is create a scenario of intrigue, conspiracy, and sinister plots inside the minds of the American people. You dont need facts to instill paranoia and fear. "What if?" and "It could be" and "perhaps so and so"...is a logic all to successful in the minds of a cynical public. I fear Mr. Avery isn't as nutty as we thought and hoped. Shoot.
 
See, this is why I think Dylan is indeed a smart cookie. He KNOWS he can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that no plane hit the Pentagon, or that the WTC was a controlled demo. But what he can do...with much certainty, is create a scenario of intrigue, conspiracy, and sinister plots inside the minds of the American people. You dont need facts to instill paranoia and fear. "What if?" and "It could be" and "perhaps so and so"...is a logic all to successful in the minds of a cynical public. I fear Mr. Avery isn't as nutty as we thought and hoped. Shoot.
Exactly, move the discussion away from objective things like science, physics engineering and evidence and into the realm of politics, subjectivity and opinions.

With this move, Avery is admitting defeat

ETA - I hope I can still attend the bake sale. Lynn Cheney makes hash brownies to die for.
 
Dylan is dirt dumb, or a sneaky capitalistic (who cares I got the money), guy. While the loyal, I do not know what the rule8 is going on, LCF drones and cult members still remain clueless for now. LCF people who have not a clue, follow the money.

I see the post at LCF, I can not figure out how dumb you have to be to believe the conclusion of Dylan or CIT. Undefined ignorance is loose; loose change forum. Loose Change Forum, the "Dark Ages Forum of Ignorance", a "Mindless Cultism of Rotten Brain Matter" loyal cult members spew and accept false 9/11 Information, it hurts to see it.
 
Last edited:
See, this is why I think Dylan is indeed a smart cookie. He KNOWS he can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that no plane hit the Pentagon, or that the WTC was a controlled demo. But what he can do...with much certainty, is create a scenario of intrigue, conspiracy, and sinister plots inside the minds of the American people. You dont need facts to instill paranoia and fear. "What if?" and "It could be" and "perhaps so and so"...is a logic all to successful in the minds of a cynical public. I fear Mr. Avery isn't as nutty as we thought and hoped. Shoot.
You know you just revealed the whole plot for LCFC don't you? Cast a doubt collect the cash.
 
Lyte's gone off the deep end over there.

Dylan knows it's bunk. He's just playing along because he knows there are a handful of other nuts that believe in that nonsense.

And, every additional truther he can string along translates into an additional "fistful of dollars" if he ever gets his last little vid released...
 
I just love Lyte's assertion:

Craig, with all due respect, you really come off as paranoid when you accuse anyone who disagrees a jref'r, especially when they, such as racerx, are not one.
Dude acts like one and lied like one in this thread.
Jref is eponymous for 9/11 truth skeptic.

His argument with Jarroyo is classic. Jarroyo looks at all the evidence, decides it is inconclusive, and is then called a liar by Lyte.

So basically, if you do not agree with CIT's insane theories after evaluating the evidence, you are a liar. No ifs, no buts.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom