• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Christine O'Donnell is not "Pro-Life"

Puppycow

Penultimate Amazing
Puppycow
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
31,994
Location
Yokohama, Japan
Delaware Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell is not merely kooky, she's evil. What's more, she is a baby killer. She claims to be "Pro-Life" because she is against abortion. She believes that life begins at conception and fetuses have souls. But she is against policies that literally save the lives of babies.

In 1997, O'Donnell took to C-SPAN to complain that the government was spending too much money combating AIDS. She voiced concerns that a drag queen ball "celebrates the type of lifestyle which leads to the disease." She also objected to calling those with AIDS "victims" and said the disease was a consequence of a certain "lifestyle."
Click to expand...

You know who's helped by government money spent fighting HIV? Fetuses and infants for one. Antiretroviral therapy reduces the rate of transmission of HIV from mothers to infants. How do we know this? Well, government-funded research. How do poor pregnant women infected with HIV (don't call them "victims" says O'Donnell) afford this therapy? Government funding.

How very Christian of her.
 
Sorry excuse for a Christian, isn't she? No charity in her shrivelled little soul.
 
AIDS is a voluntary condition, its not rocket science to avoid it effectively. The only way a responsible person might get it is from dirty blood transfusion or some sort of a rape, but these are exceedingly rare and the rare cases can be easily handled with charity donations from the evil christians.
 
pgwenthold said:
Right. I mean, it's not like we should punish the child for a mistake the mother made, right?

(hey, that argument sounds familiar...)
Click to expand...

A nice christian family will hopefully adopt, the AIDS ridden parent should be in jail for assault against the child and the sexual partner. Why can't you just adopt a kid if you have AIDS, why do you have to create another patient? Probably to get some benefits from the nanny government.
 
Infoexcavator said:
A nice christian family will hopefully adopt, the AIDS ridden parent should be in jail for assault against the child and the sexual partner. Why can't you just adopt a kid if you have AIDS, why do you have to create another patient? Probably to get some benefits from the nanny government.
Click to expand...

Or the pregnant could have an abortion. But wait, O'donnell wants the nanny govt to tell her she can't abort.
 
Infoexcavator said:
AIDS is a voluntary condition, its not rocket science to avoid it effectively. The only way a responsible person might get it is from dirty blood transfusion or some sort of a rape, but these are exceedingly rare and the rare cases can be easily handled with charity donations from the evil christians.
Click to expand...

Ahh.. So no need to find a cure, or spend money on it. The evil filthy people who get AIDS can be left to rot, and die. Its all their fault.

The rare cases where the pure responsible people who get it accidentally, will... what? Have it treated by good god fearing christians who will pray the disease away?
 
Infoexcavator said:
AIDS is a voluntary condition, its not rocket science to avoid it effectively. The only way a responsible person might get it is from dirty blood transfusion or some sort of a rape, but these are exceedingly rare and the rare cases can be easily handled with charity donations from the evil christians.
Click to expand...

Ahh a voluntary condition that became so widespread because people didn't know they had volunteered. One of the most important part of researching aids is education as it can be the key to prevention and others will not have to unwillingly volunteer.

When christians label it as a lifestyle disease they mean a dirty homo disease or a punishment from god. Face the fact that anyone from a nun to bum can contract aids from any number of causes. Most STD'd are transmitted unknowingly as most carriers do not know they have one. Saying "piss off and die" to all of these volunteers is so very christian. What ever happened to love the sinner, hate the sin?
 
Infoexcavator said:
It's not okay to kill a child just because the mother was reckless. She could have taken a morning after pill.
Click to expand...
Abortions do not kill children. aborting an hiv fetus would stop people from garnering the"nanny" benefits you despise.
 
ZirconBlue said:
Or -- and I know this craze, but bear with me -- she could take retrovirals that would make it less likely that the disease would be passed on to the child.
Click to expand...

Sure, just pay for it yourself. I don't see why taxpayers should be forced to pay for it. As for AIDS research, private businesses can do it all they want for charity or profit, let free markets sort it out.
 
Last edited:
Wwjd?

blessed be the meek for they shall inherit the earth. Not those that are meek by lifestyle mind you. Just those that are victims of meekness. - jesus christ
Click to expand...
 
Infoexcavator said:
Sure, just pay for it yourself. I don't see why taxpayers should be forced to pay for it. As for AIDS research, private businesses can do it all they want for charity or profit, let free markets sort it out.
Click to expand...

What free markets?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom