Calling All Remote Viewers

[Pyrrho]

Once again, I present an opportunity for you to prove your special powers. Locate this girl:

http://www.newsnet5.com/news/2428128/detail.html

ELYRIA, Ohio -- A local teenager is missing after vanishing from her Lorain County home, according to officials.

NewsChannel5's Debora Lee reported that police believe the Internet may hold the key to her disappearance.

Like many 15-year-olds, Aschliee Everett spends a lot of time on the computer. Now, police believe she may be with a 40-year-old man she met online.

 

[Darat]

Once again, I present an opportunity for you to prove your special powers. Locate this girl:

http://www.newsnet5.com/news/2428128/detail.html

Hmm... strange isn't it that people who can prove that they can "remote view" don't step forward to help with this case?

Undoubtable it will either be ignored or some attempt to divert attention away from a specific will be employed.

To the people who have said they can "remote view", to the people who claim they have proved it right here on this forum - please for the sake of this girl and her loved ones locate her!

 

[TLN]

Re: Re: Calling All Remote Viewers

To the people who have said they can "remote view", to the people who claim they have proved it right here on this forum - please for the sake of this girl and her loved ones locate her!

He probably already has. If you'll just wait a little while longer...

 

[Darat]

Re: Re: Re: Calling All Remote Viewers

He probably already has. If you'll just wait a little while longer...

Of course our remote viewers have already located her….

Just take the first letter of the third line in the last post in the thread down, combine that with the 4th letter from the first post last Wednesday and you have the initials of the town where she is to be located....

Or at least that is my prediction for one of the ways this lack of humanity by people who claim they can remote view back and forwards in time will be explained.



Anyone who wonders why people do sometimes get angry with some of the claims made here by posters think about this case.

There are people posting tonight who claim to have the superpower of remote viewing, yet when it comes to the crunch, when a child could be in terrible danger, when parents are suffering torture not knowing where their child is or if they are even alive these people just stand by.....

 

[Lucianarchy]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Calling All Remote Viewers

Of course our remote viewers have already located her….

Just take the first letter of the third line in the last post in the thread down, combine that with the 4th letter from the first post last Wednesday and you have the initials of the town where she is to be located....

Or at least that is my prediction for one of the ways this lack of humanity by people who claim they can remote view back and forwards in time will be explained.



Anyone who wonders why people do sometimes get angry with some of the claims made here by posters think about this case.

There are people posting tonight who claim to have the superpower of remote viewing, yet when it comes to the crunch, when a child could be in terrible danger, when parents are suffering torture not knowing where their child is or if they are even alive these people just stand by.....

You are quite disgusting, Darat. What you are doing here by using this terrible event in order to accuse people who have some RV ability, is far worse than any psychic scammers who take advantage of greiving relatives. You are taking advantage of this poor childs plight in order to flame someone on an internet forum. I'll leave it to work out for yourself why (a) anyone would want to report any information here instead of the law enforcement people and (b) why you think anyone here has the specific, reliable sort of ability you talk of. In the meantime, meditate or say a prayer for your best wishes and safety to the child and her family. I won't bother asking you to apologise for your sickening behaviour, you don't seem mature enough to understand why it is necessary.

 

[Prester John]

Then please for the sake of the lost teenager and her poor family tell us what you can see Luci....................

 

[KelvinG]

Yes Luci, instead of trying to turn this around and attack Darat why don't you impress us with those amazing remote viewing skills of yours (y'know, the ones that have been tested in Edinburgh) and find that lost child.

Oh, but that's right, it doesn't work that way. I suppose after they find her, you will try and claim that you knew all along just like that Ladybrook nonsense you attempted scam the board with.

 

[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

Luci said:

(b) why you think anyone here has the specific, reliable sort of ability you talk of.

Uh, exactly. We don't think anyone here has even a slightly reliable ability that could be of any use whatsoever. Given the marvelous possibilities if someone did have the ability, particularly in the face of horrific events such as this girl missing, it is grotesque that anyone even suggests there is such a possibility.

Sometimes this crap just pisses me off.

~~ Paul

 

[Prester John]

waiting... (.....)

 

[Darat]

Re: Re: Calling All Remote Viewers

Sorry to be so egotistical as to quote myself but ...

....snip....

Undoubtedly it will either be ignored or some attempt to divert attention away from a specific will be employed.


...snip...

(And I’ve taken the opportunity to correct a misspelling.)

 

[Soapy Sam]

I do not, in any way, believe Luci's psychic assertions.
Therefore, given the truth of Paul's statement-'

We don't think anyone here has even a slightly reliable ability that could be of any use whatsoever. '-

I feel it is both tasteless and pointless, to issue such a challenge.

 

[reprise]

Luci did make one valid point. Many of those convinced of their RV ability will be contacting the police with their "vital information", thus leading to many hours being spent pursuing lines of inquiry based on nothing more substantial than the egotistical delusions of whackjobs.

Should I ever be unfortunate enough to find myself in a similar situation to these parents, I sincerely hope that I will retain enough presence of mind to kick the ever-loving crap out of anyone who offers me their "paranormal" assistance to find my child.

 

[!Xx+-Rational-+xX!]

^^^ So you already made your mind up about RV'ers being whackjobs. I don't know about this ***** but I didn't think skepticism was about reaching these pre-determined conclusions without evidence about paranormal abilities like that.

 

[CFLarsen]

^^^ So you already made your mind up about RV'ers being whackjobs. I don't know about this ***** but I didn't think skepticism was about reaching these pre-determined conclusions without evidence about paranormal abilities like that.

It's "put up or shut up" here. Tough? Yeah. So is being held captive.

 

[reprise]

^^^ So you already made your mind up about RV'ers being whackjobs. I don't know about this ***** but I didn't think skepticism was about reaching these pre-determined conclusions without evidence about paranormal abilities like that.

Pre-determined? Nope.

My conclusions in respect of remote viewing are based on evaluation of the "evidence" provided by those who claim it's existence. If you want myself and other skeptics to reach different conclusions, provide us with the evidence which supports those different conclusions.

You seem to be over-looking the fact that many skeptics were once believers in the paranormal and changed their conclusions precisely because they examined the evidence in support of the paranormal and found it inadequate.

 

[T'ai Chi]

Calling out remote viewers? Yeah, post to the JREF board. That makes sense. That is where all of them hang out.

 

[!Xx+-Rational-+xX!]

Pre-determined? Nope.

My conclusions in respect of remote viewing are based on evaluation of the "evidence" provided by those who claim it's existence. If you want myself and other skeptics to reach different conclusions, provide us with the evidence which supports those different conclusions.

Then what evidence supports your statement that they are whackjobs since you are making the claim? I never made any claims about remote viewing and I never asked for anyone to reach different conclusions I can't stand idiots like you who pretend to be skeptics then just outright reject everything which does not go along with your little world view in that way. Another example is I noticed in the Pam Reynolds NDE thread where you said "rather we reject claims that they are "supernatural". You have clearly already made your mind up so what is the point? That is not what skepticism should be about your just a non-believer or at the most a cynical skeptic.

You seem to be over-looking the fact that many skeptics were once believers in the paranormal and changed their conclusions precisely because they examined the evidence in support of the paranormal and found it inadequate.

You seem to be over-looking the fact that many believers were once skeptics in the paranormal and changed their conclusions precisely because they examined the evidence in support of the paranormal or had a paranormal experience and found it very adequate.

 

[Darat]

Re: Re: Re: Calling All Remote Viewers

And again...

....snip....

Undoubtedly it will either be ignored or some attempt to divert attention away from a specific will be employed.


...snip...

People (more then one) who post here have made a claim they have the ability to "remote view".

Yet when a reason that should completely overrule for anyone with even just an ounce of compassion any of the “I don't like sceptics" or "Randi is a fraud, I don't trust him" excuses, e.g. a young girl potentially in danger of her life or terrible abuse what happens....?

…Silence.....

Their silence condemns them.

Find the girl.

 

[Ladewig]

So you already made your mind up about RV'ers being whackjobs. I don't know about this ***** but I didn't think skepticism was about reaching these pre-determined conclusions without evidence about paranormal abilities like that.

If someone claimed the ability to flap his arms fast enough to fly through the air, I would consider such a person a whackjob or a con-artist. Similarly, if someone claims the ability to see things at a distance, the odds are overwhelming that the person falls into one of those two categories. Evidence of such a power would require changing both the laws of physics and biology. The evidence presented so far in the field of RV is nowhere near strong enough to throw out the foundations of these two fields of science.

 

[!Xx+-Rational-+xX!]

If someone claimed the ability to flap his arms fast enough to fly through the air, I would consider such a person a whackjob or a con-artist. Similarly, if someone claims the ability to see things at a distance, the odds are overwhelming that the person falls into one of those two categories. Evidence of such a power would require changing both the laws of physics and biology. The evidence presented so far in the field of RV is nowhere near strong enough to throw out the foundations of these two fields of science.

This is an extremely flawed unfair comparison. How many people claim to have the ability to flap their arms and fly (which is something you obviously just made up) compared to people who claim to rv that also has some evidence (which is debateable but we already know what so called skeptics are going to come up with when confronted with any evidence)?