• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Breitbart? Another lie or not?

applecorped said:
You can't spell difficult without cult.
Click to expand...

Nor without "diffi". :rolleyes:

What is that supposed to mean? Argument from spelling similarities? One-liners only make you look clever if they are actually clever, y'know.

Would you like to try to defend briebart's reputation? The site whose namesake felt that the ends justified the means, including putting forth fabricated evidence as genuine long enough until the damage was done?
 
I remember the "liar" accusations when Breitbart was in the midst of stopping Weiner.

Also, he was right about the Occupiers being rapist scum.

And about Pigford being a scam.

Rest in Peace.
 
mikedenk said:
I remember the "liar" accusations when Breitbart was in the midst of stopping Weiner.

Also, he was right about the Occupiers being rapist scum.

And about Pigford being a scam.

Rest in Peace.
Click to expand...

The National Enquirier has been right a few times too.
 
Sheitbart is the epitome of a 30s or so comment about an agent for actors: "Hello.", he lied.
 
applecorped said:
You can't spell difficult without cult.
Click to expand...

Good thing, then, it's not spelled "diffi****."

Michael

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for Rule 10. Do not attempt to bypass the autocensor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mikedenk said:
I remember the "liar" accusations when Breitbart was in the midst of stopping Weiner.

Also, he was right about the Occupiers being rapist scum.

And about Pigford being a scam.

Rest in Peace.
Click to expand...

Not to mention the pervasive fraud in ACORN.
 
maxpower1227 said:
Speaking of that sleazebag O'Keefe (who, IIRC, had to pay a $100,000 settlement related to his doctored ACORN videos),
Click to expand...
Not entirely correct. He didn't "have" to pay that. He voluntarily paid that to make the nuisance lawsuit go away.


apparently his latest stunt is using homeless people as pawns to try to paint CA lawmakers as hypocrites for having the audacity to pass some laws giving rights to vagrants.
Click to expand...
Brilliant expose. O'Keefe deserves a medal for once again demonstrating the hypocracy of the politicians.
 
So you have no problem with someone using homeless people as pawns by having people disguised as them come to the private residences of lawmakers in order to be able to paint them as "hypocrites" for supporting legislation that essentially just allows them to exist in public places? Do you think O'Keefe did this out of genuine concern for the plight of the homeless rather than the desire to score cheap political points? Do you honestly think he has the slightest bit of empathy toward the less fortunate, based on his body of.. "work"?

O'Keefe is a sleazy propagandist and a criminal. How anyone could support him after his asinine stunts with ACORN, Abbie Boudreau and his attempted breakin to Mary Landrieu's office, just baffles me. You really are a piece of, let's just say "work" again.
 
maxpower1227 said:
So you have no problem with someone using homeless people as pawns by having people disguised as them come to the private residences of lawmakers in order to be able to paint them as "hypocrites" for supporting legislation that essentially just allows them to exist in public places?
Click to expand...
"using homeless people as pawns" is your distorted and inaccurate characterization.

Do you think O'Keefe did this out of genuine concern for the plight of the homeless rather than the desire to score cheap political points?
Click to expand...
He did this for the reason you've already acknowledged, to demonstrate politicians' hypocrisy.

Do you honestly think he has the slightest bit of empathy toward the less fortunate, based on his body of.. "work"?
Click to expand...
This wasn't about the homeless problem. You're making stuff up due to your extreme bias against him.

O'Keefe is a sleazy propagandist and a criminal.
Click to expand...
He's a brilliant journalist that deserves a medal.

How anyone could support him after his asinine stunts with ACORN, Abbie Boudreau and his attempted breakin to Mary Landrieu's office, just baffles me. You really are a piece of, let's just say "work" again.
Click to expand...
I understand that toppling your sacred cows can cause much anger.
 
Neally said:
He's a brilliant journalist that deserves a medal.
Click to expand...

And all he got was a lousy plea deal to keep his sorry butt out of jail. Damn librul ... justice system, I guess. :rolleyes:

I understand that toppling your sacred cows can cause much anger.
Click to expand...

What sacred cows? An organization dedicated to helping impoverished minorities? A random Democratic Senator? A CNN reporter I had never heard of until O'Keefe's sleazeball stunt??
 
It sure seems like O'Keefe liked to break the law in order to hurt innocent people for political reasons. He's certainly not on my list of people I'd trust.
 
Redtail said:
The National Enquirier has been right a few times too.
Click to expand...


For all the crap (mostly rightfully) dumped on the Enquirer, they were the ones who broke the John Edwards scandal story wide-open while the rest of the media was conducting a protective blackout.

Sweet Jesus, that reminds me of the time the Dems tried to put Mr. I Feel Pretty one step away from the presidency. Yucky.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom