This actually began in this thread
There are several posts on Pages 2 and 3 about it, but I thought splitting it would be best.
To summarize:
In an informal experiment, Toastrider placed a book on top of his computer and invited anyone to determine the title via remote viewing or any other paranormal ability.
Max gave an interesting but debatable answer.
Toastrider is repeating the experiment via pms; I am setting up my own similar experiment on the forum.
So far, Max has agreed to participate, but it is open to anyone, believer or non-believer, skeptic or cynic, woo-woo or curmudgeon. I would, in fact, prefer to have several participants.
[As an aside: Toastrider, you are welcome to use this thread for your public communications and posting of results]
I have suggested a protocol which has been neither agreed to nor rejected by Max, but Interesting Ian and Clancie have objected to some of it (both of them in a professional manner; this comment is not to meant to be derogatory).
In my test, I have placed a book on top of my locker in hopes that someone can determine its title or possibly subject matter via anomalous cognition:
I will quote some of the relevant parts of previous posts:
That's a lot of quoting in one post, but it's the best I can do.
For those who want to participate, please join in.
For those who have suggestions on protocol, they are most welcome.
There are other specific discussions between me and Clancie about protocols, but I didn't quote them. You may find them of interest in the other thread.
There are several posts on Pages 2 and 3 about it, but I thought splitting it would be best.
To summarize:
In an informal experiment, Toastrider placed a book on top of his computer and invited anyone to determine the title via remote viewing or any other paranormal ability.
Max gave an interesting but debatable answer.
Toastrider is repeating the experiment via pms; I am setting up my own similar experiment on the forum.
So far, Max has agreed to participate, but it is open to anyone, believer or non-believer, skeptic or cynic, woo-woo or curmudgeon. I would, in fact, prefer to have several participants.
[As an aside: Toastrider, you are welcome to use this thread for your public communications and posting of results]
I have suggested a protocol which has been neither agreed to nor rejected by Max, but Interesting Ian and Clancie have objected to some of it (both of them in a professional manner; this comment is not to meant to be derogatory).
In my test, I have placed a book on top of my locker in hopes that someone can determine its title or possibly subject matter via anomalous cognition:
I will quote some of the relevant parts of previous posts:
Originally posted by Garrette:
We haven't worked out details, but the gist is for anyone you like to correctly name the title of a book I have selected and set out.
Preferably, we will do this several times.
It does not matter to me if the title is gleaned by telepathy, clairvoyance, remote viewing, quantum displacement, astral traveling, superstring warping, mediumship, temporal anti-gravitron tunneling, or alien communication. I am only interested that the title be correctly determined somehow other than via mundane means
Originally posted by Garrette:
I can't speak for Toastrider, Winston, but for my book title experiment I'm open to suggestions to ensure I don't cheat.
(Although I think there are those on this forum who might vouch that they trust me; I think Clancie would be one, though I don't want to speak for her).
Perhaps there is a mutually agreeable third party to whom I could e-mail or pm the book title.
Or this: I could mail the name of the book to different people, you included. Mail takes about two weeks to reach anyone from here, so I could mail it (you could check the post mark upon receipt) and then give the participants about 5 days or so to respond.
Originally posted by Max
Garratt
I don't feel confident with this as I couldn't concentrate as deeply as I wanted. I got adventure, a boy, but also horse and carriage racing so I don't know. Could it be Mark Twain book?
Originally posted by Garrette:
Hi, Max, thanks for participating.
I don't feel confident with this as I couldn't concentrate as deeply as I wanted.
Not a problem. Take as long as you like until you do feel comfortable.
I got adventure, a boy, but also horse and carriage racing so I don't know.
Is this your guess, or do you want to wait until you feel comfortable?
We haven't really set any guidelines, but I'd like to propose some now:
1. We're going for title only; descriptions of subject matter do not count as hits.
2. Words actually in the title count as hits, even if out of order.
3. Words not in the title take away on a one-for-one basis from the hits; this means it's possible to get a negative score.
4. No questions will be answered except after you submit your word(s)
5. Each book will be a commercially published book. No other restrictions. Out-of-print books are allowed.
If these protocols do not fit with how you get your impressions, just propose some of your own. I'm quite flexible on this.
Originally posted by Max:
Could it be Mark Twain book?
See #4 above.
P.S. I'm glad I got the darn thing up on my locker sooner than I expected...whew....
Originally posted by Garrette:
Originally posted by Interesting Ian:
I don't think this is going to work, even assuming Max received the information anomalously for the first book. Research indicates that people initially do well, then their performance slips, but they do well again in the very last trial (albeit not as well as the very beginning).
And from anecdotal accounts we cannot just perform at will, at least not time after time.
So even if Max got the first book by psi, I would say he probably won't be able to do it again.
-----
You may be right, Ian.
Tell you what: If we change the requirement to exact title (I won't count misspellings against him), then I will agree that if Max gets just 1 out of 10, I will begin seriously reviewing my position on anomalous cognition.
I'm willing to consider 1 out of 10 in this effort a success
Originally posted by Max:
I'd like to make it clear that I am not a medium/clairvoyant or anything else regarding telling fortunes etc. The book Toasty challenged us with is my first attempt to do anything remotely like this. I have experienced unexplainable incidents during my life and most of you will be aware of the ones I have related on here. I don't think it is possible to come up with exact details of a book title nor do I think I happened to be lucky in selecting the God Father. I think that, that is phenomenal given all the millions of words we use and I came up with God. I don't even know how a clairvoyant works, all I did was to concentrate so hard on the book by Toasty's computer but this took tremendous effort. I was unable to get so deep in with Garratte's book. I may have an attempt again but I'm not sure when. I don't think one can put a time/place on the excercise. I left Toast's challenge for quite a long time and then I just felt one night that I could take up his challenge, so I did. I can't explain it.
That's a lot of quoting in one post, but it's the best I can do.
For those who want to participate, please join in.
For those who have suggestions on protocol, they are most welcome.
There are other specific discussions between me and Clancie about protocols, but I didn't quote them. You may find them of interest in the other thread.