• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Birth certificates for stillborns?

Walrus32

Critical Thinker
Walrus32
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
469
Madness...

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=975048

"Pennsylvania lawmakers are again considering a bill to provide birth certificates for stillborn babies.

Proponents have previously submitted bills for the birth certificates, but efforts have failed each time. In fact, the topic has become something of a political "football," partly because of the abortion issue. Charlene Bashore of the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation tells OneNewsNow the organization is supportive of the concept but does not take sides.

"We only got involved when this bill was originally introduced because a House committee chairwoman amended the bill and removed every reference to 'baby' or 'child' in the bill and replaced it with 'fetus' or 'fetal' and completely dehumanized the baby," Bashore explains.

A different committee avenue is being taken this time in the House, she says. "So I expect that it probably would not face the obstacles that were placed in front of it before because it did pass the Senate unanimously a year-and-a-half ago in its original form," she comments.

Bashore believes that if the bill does make it through committee to the House floor, it will pass this time. The drive is being led by 73-year-old Dorothy Knappenberger of Whitehall Township, whose granddaughter birthed a stillborn baby and was denied a birth certificate.

While 27 states do provide birth certificates in cases of stillborn babies, abortion-rights advocates are cautious because they fear such legislation could imply that a fetus is a person and possibly fuel pro-life arguments. But a Planned Parenthood spokesperson has stated that as long as the measure is carefully worded, the organization does not oppose the parental option of receiving a birth certificate for stillborns."
 
I've got to side with Planned Parenthood on this one. If it makes someone who has had a stillborn child better to get a birth certificate, why on Earth wouldn't you grant one? This assumes said certificate didn't grant any legal power to the fetus or parents (thinking tax exemption, in the case of the parents.) I believe that my birth certificate has a check box for "Live Birth" even, which pretty much simplifies everything greatly.

Why is it madness?
 
There is no reason to grant one, because a birth certificate is by law an official document on a certain occurence, and make a birth duly registered (and not a stillbirth). It can even be used as temporary identification documents, and is used by many administration (at least here around).

Naturally this all depend on law, and how much value have the document. If in the US such birth certificate have no official values, and has no consequence, so be it, give them the birth certficate.
 
Skeptical Greg said:
Fail to see the connection with " Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology " ..
Click to expand...
.
Agreed, but responding in-thread so that when it is moved:

All six certificates I have had reason to examine due to familial relationships have had the verbiage "certificate of live birth" somewhere in. As such, they have been used to then gain various other documents: SSN cards, passports, visas, work permits, driver's licenses...

If a state wants to issue a certificate of non-live "birth," then most women could apply for one every 28 days.

I'm sorry, but I do not see the point of issuing official certificates for stillborns.
.
 
Accept my apologies for using the wrong forum. I saw this thru a mindset of someone who handled stillbirths as a complication of pregnancy for 50+ years.

It's partly a semantic distinction also. "Stillbirth" is often synonymous with spontaneous abortion, in which there is often not an identifiable fetus. "Stillborn" usually denotes an apparently normal baby born dead. Some hospitals will give the parents an unofficial document of birth, which is not an official birth certificate that the state requires.

Obviously, the proposed state law(s) need to be exact in there wording. E. g., if a woman demands a ghastly late-term abortion for no good reason, should the state then be compelled to issue her a "birth" certificate. In my mind that's madness.
 
Our first was stillborn. He has a name, we refer to him by it, and the hospital made a photo album with him dressed in tiny newborn clothes.

He deserves a birth certificate.
 
Monkey Ghost said:
Our first was stillborn. He has a name, we refer to him by it, and the hospital made a photo album with him dressed in tiny newborn clothes.

He deserves a birth certificate.
Click to expand...
.
My complete sympathies for your loss.

Given your other mementos, why does he "deserve" a birth certificate? What possible benefit does *he* derive from it? What possible benefit would you?

Miguel died shortly after his second birthday. We have a certificate of live birth. It means nothing compared to his death. We have pictures of him, most of which are with his then-four-year-old brother. These are far more comforting to him, and to us, than a piece of paper saying he drew breath on the 3rd of November 2007. Micah chose a stuffed turtle for his brother, which was Miguel's constant companion as he came to crawl and walk. Murtyl was awarded a place of honour on Micah's bookcase after Miguel passed, and sometimes when I went to wake him, I would find that turtle had managed to creep into Micah's bed.

Time came for the crib to be disassembled and donated to charity with some other baby stuff. Micah asked about who might be sleeping there. I explained that we didn't know, but some little boy or girl who really needed it would have a place to sleep after we dropped it off. He brought his backpack when we went to the Salvation Army, and while he thought I wouldn't notice, he pulled out Murtyl, kissed her goodbye, and placed her on a shelf with other baby stuff.

Tell me that a piece of paper means more than that.
.
 
Last edited:
Of course it's not very rational to have birth certificates for stillborn babies, but when that happens, parents are not rational, and everyone has their own way of trying to cope with the loss. Perhaps it may really help someone to have a birth certificate? if so, I can't see any harm. There must be some way to ensure that it will not be misused.

I've given birth to a dead child, and to one which died a few days after birth. One of the worst things afterwards (still is) was the assumption some people seemed to make that our daughters had not existed as our children, that we were childless. We were not, they were just not alive any longer. I can understand that someone in that situation may be comforted by a birth certificate; proof that your child has indeed existed.
 
This is the kind of thing I wonder about the impact on modern medicine on how people think. People so much expect infants to survive that it is remarkable when they don't. I remember hearing about some cultures that didn't name children until after a year, because the uncertainty of their survival made it questionable.

I also wonder how far along a pregnancy needs to be to get one of these certificates of dead birth. 3 months? 5 Months,7 months?
 
Helen said:
I don't know, I somehow feel that it should be up to the parents. I still think it's very irrational, and wouldn't have wanted one myself, but if someone is helped by it, does that really matter?
Click to expand...

So how about then a non legal document form of certificate? One main concern I might have is over identity thefts and the like that issuing more birth certificates could cause.

Why does it have to be a legal document?
 
Well, couldn't the birth certificate show that the child is dead? I think it should be the same in every other respect, though, in order to be of any use; proof that your child is no different than any other child.

I haven't thought about this before, but I can understand that it could be a comfort.
 
My mom had two stillborns after me and before my brother. I sincerely doubt she would have wanted a certificate reminding her of the events.
 
In the UK, stillbirths are all registered, and didn't realise that wasn't the case in the US.

Why is registration necessary?
Stillbirth registration began in 1927 to help protect infant life. As well as being an important source of historical and statistical information, it gives the parents the opportunity to have their child officially acknowledged and to give him or her names if they wish to.
Click to expand...
http://www.calderdale.gov.uk/advice/life-events/register-office/birthregistration/stillbirth.html
 
Last edited:
ponderingturtle said:
And there they have a cut off at 24 weeks were before that they don't consider it a still birth, but a miscarriage and don't document it.
Click to expand...

Well since this thread is about stillbirths and not miscarriages.... ;)

Is the definition of stillbirth in the US different? Would a first trimester miscarriage be called a stillbirth?

ETA - I just checked, and it seems the problem is that you don't have a standard definition of stillbirth:

In the United States, there is no standard definition of the term 'stillbirth'.[8] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention collects statistical information on "live births, fetal deaths, and induced termination of pregnancy" from 57 reporting areas in the United States. Each reporting area has different guidelines and definitions for what is being reported; many do not use the term "stillbirth" at all. The federal guidelines suggests (at page 1) that fetal death and stillbirth can be interchangeable terms. The CDC definition of "fetal death" is based on the definition promulgated by the World Health Organization in 1950 (see section above on Canada).

The federal guidelines recommend reporting those fetal deaths whose birth weight is over 350g, or those more than 20 weeks gestation. Forty-one areas use a definition very similar to the federal definition, thirteen areas use a shortened definition of fetal death, and three areas have no formal definition of fetal death. Only 11 areas specifically use the term 'stillbirth' , often synonymously with late fetal death, however they are split between whether stillbirths are "irrespective of the duration of pregnancy", or whether some age or weight constraint is applied.
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stillbirth#United_States
 
Last edited:
Professor Yaffle said:
Well since this thread is about stillbirths and not miscarriages.... ;)

Is the definition of stillbirth in the US different? Would a first trimester miscarriage be called a stillbirth?
Click to expand...

Which I find quite surprising as the difference between a miscarriage and a stillbirth is obviously something that society recognised a long time ago, that is why we have different words in English for the two.
 
Darat said:
Which I find quite surprising as the difference between a miscarriage and a stillbirth is obviously something that society recognised a long time ago, that is why we have different words in English for the two.
Click to expand...

Sure, but that doesn't mean that there is a clear distinction between them. Well except in Britain I guess, as legally first 6 months = miscarriage after that it is a still birth.
 
ponderingturtle said:
Sure, but that doesn't mean that there is a clear distinction between them. Well except in Britain I guess, as legally first 6 months = miscarriage after that it is a still birth.
Click to expand...

I don't understand the problem. There is no clear distiction between a child and an adult either, but we generally create an arbitrary dividing line to allow adults to do things that children cannot - rather than just saying that because there is no clear division, we will just stop adults from doing those things too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom