Sherman Bay
Master Poster
A friend is taking her allergic dog to a vet far away because he has a BICOM 2000 machine. Naturally, I was interested in what it is and what it does, so I went to the BICOM 2000 web site, where I find that this marvelous machine cures everything, even diseases not yet discovered, using the "scientific principle of bioresonance."
The more I dig into this site, the worse it gets. First, here's the impressive digital (digital!) machine, with lots of cool knobs and dials. Next, there appears to be an association with Nobel prize winning technology in 2003. Clicking on the document Are there evidence-based studies on the efficacy of the bioresonance method?, we find that, no there aren't, and that's for a darn good reason:
But it just gets worse. I thought I would try to debunk the How It Works page, but I can't find anything to agree with, so every sentence needs to be handled, and most are extravagant claims. Only the language is mild.
The chart at the bottom of that page is a real hoot, showing a dog getting a treatment by sitting on a mat attached to the machine. Basically, since you asked, the machine analyzes the animal's frequencies from its paw on the mat, which are "modulated," then returned to the animal thru a blanket on its back, and the animal is cured of whatever the machine detected was wrong with him. Lastly, the owner writes a check to the vet for $100. No wonder vets like it.
So how can they get away with this BS? Because it is marketed to veternarians, not human GPs. I imagine dogs know better; now only if they could communicate with their masters.
I am trying to get an operating manual for the BICOM. It should be good for some more laffs.
The more I dig into this site, the worse it gets. First, here's the impressive digital (digital!) machine, with lots of cool knobs and dials. Next, there appears to be an association with Nobel prize winning technology in 2003. Clicking on the document Are there evidence-based studies on the efficacy of the bioresonance method?, we find that, no there aren't, and that's for a darn good reason:
There aren't enough rolleyes in the Universe to express my feelings.The focus on randomised double-blind studies is an inappropriate attempt to apply the laws of inanimate nature to biological systems. Major pharmacological scandals go to prove the dubious reliability of randomised double-blind studies. Such experiments by their very nature necessitate an extreme reductionist approach which completely ignores the idiosyncrasies of biological systems. From an ethical point of view it is also a very questionable way of proceeding.
Yet our aim here is not to condemn randomised double-blind studies in general. Rather, the process of only accepting this method as scientific evidence is a very arbitrary and restrictive way of establishing proof which goes against scientific principles.
But it just gets worse. I thought I would try to debunk the How It Works page, but I can't find anything to agree with, so every sentence needs to be handled, and most are extravagant claims. Only the language is mild.
The chart at the bottom of that page is a real hoot, showing a dog getting a treatment by sitting on a mat attached to the machine. Basically, since you asked, the machine analyzes the animal's frequencies from its paw on the mat, which are "modulated," then returned to the animal thru a blanket on its back, and the animal is cured of whatever the machine detected was wrong with him. Lastly, the owner writes a check to the vet for $100. No wonder vets like it.
So how can they get away with this BS? Because it is marketed to veternarians, not human GPs. I imagine dogs know better; now only if they could communicate with their masters.
I am trying to get an operating manual for the BICOM. It should be good for some more laffs.
Last edited: