• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bill O'Reilly talking about "The Muslim Problem" again... thoughts on this?

PS13

Critical Thinker
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
377
The first video is the 'Talking Points Memo' segment of his show from 10/25/10 and the second video, also from 10/25/10, is of his first guest, Ahmed Rehab, from C.A.I.R. ... Both videos are pretty short and quick to watch.







Where to start...

Ok. I'm sure most of you know that Bill thinks there is a 'Muslim problem around the world.'

The way I see it, it's a problem with a small group of Muslim extremists who are twisting the words of the Qur`an and using that as one of their reasons for waging war on The USA & our allies.

In these videos Bill keeps referring to "A Muslim Problem".

He cites the '70% of Americans don't want the "Ground Zero" mosque built at that location.

He says that "Conservatives generally believe that there is a major Muslim Problem in the world and Liberals tend to downplay the situation."

Then he has his guest on the show, Ahmed Rehab.


He & his guest had an exchange and Bill ticked me off, per usual. Some of the stuff talked about below.


  • Ahmed says that Muslims around the world do speak out against extremism & Bill cuts him off and says they don't because 'The Taliban will cut your head off if you support the USA.' While that may happen in Afghanistan & Pakistan, I don't believe it happens in places such as Europe or Australia. In fact, has anyone been beheaded for saying they support the USA? I'm sure their may have been, but Bill would have you believe that the USA is the only place you're safe if you speak out.


  • Ahmed calls him out on his use of the phrase "Muslim Problem" by stating what most of us know. Ahmed very correctly says that Bill is the one with the problem, because the way Bill sees it...the problem exists because they're Muslim. Therefore, it's a Muslim problem.
  • He tells Bill that is incorrect logic. Says that the problem is not because they're Muslim, but it's because these groups of people are extremists. Says that those who are Muslim and not extremists aren't a part of the Muslim problem, are they. So it's not a Muslim problem.


  • They talk for another minute or so & Bill says that they'll have to have a gentleman's disagreement about how much action the moderate Muslims have taken to help the problem.



Basically the things that piss me off about this are:

1. Bill & guys/ gals like him in the National Media using the term "Muslim Problem" to describe the crazy extremist radical groups like the Taliban, Al Queda, etc...
I'm an atheist now, but was born a Jew. I know all to well what can happen when people start saying it's a "(insert your group here) Problem". I really hate the way he generalizes Muslims.

2. Where is the source for the 70% of Americans don't want the Community Center (or terror training victory mosque, as some would have you believe) to be built 2 blocks away from GZ? Is that a Fox News poll? I never got surveyed. And even if 99% of Americans didn't want it to be built, it wouldn't & shouldn't matter. It's their building and they can do what they want with it.

3. When he has the number of civilians killed stat graphic on the screen, he says ''X'' amount of people have been killed since 9/11 from "Muslim terror activity", even though the screen reads Islamic Extremists. Again, he's using just the word "Muslim", not separating moderate from extremist.




Why can't he just say Muslim? That's the thing about Bill... He won't separate the two. He groups moderate Muslims in with Extremist Muslims. He won't admit he's wrong in doing that and he won't stop generalizing. Maybe 1 in 20 times he'll say 'Moderate Muslim', but you rarely hear him say it.

With the way people listen to him, and follow his words, it's scary to think the effect he's having on people who don't know anything about Muslims other than what they get from him and his fellow conservative pundits on TV and radio.​





  • What do you guys/ladies think of this and others like Bill?


  • Should they make an effort to call them what they are, Islamic Extremists, and stop saying it's "A Muslim Problem"?



P.S. - For the record, if citizens of Earth made me king and said they'd do as I wished, the first thing I'd do is make religion, all religion, be a part of history. Put it all on the bookshelves next to other works of fiction. I think we'd be a better planet without any religion. It's such a 'Dark Ages' way of thinking. Maybe one day the world will realize this, but I ain't holding my breath.




Anyway, I had to vent about Bill O` a little.

I know it's a huge wall of text, and may be cluttered, but please chime in.





:blacktri:
 
Fear sells, and O'Reilly is in the market of fear. It simply sells more when O'Reilly markets Islamic terrorism as more prevalent and more dangerous than it is. I know plenty of conservatives who think that all Muslims are bad people trying to take over the US. Seriously, they are not being hyperbolic. They truly believe that the kindly Muslim living amongst us is secretely rooting for the downfall of the US and the Koran directs their followers to lie to us westerners to advance their faith. There are plenty of conservatives who believe this.

O'Reilly understands his core audience are Christian conservatives who *want*, even *need* to believe in the facile black/white explanation for Islamic extremism. Far easier to see this as a *us* versus *them* where it is Christians and western world versus Muslims and nefarious middle east.

There is no way O'Reilly will change. Far more pernicious is Beck, IMO. I think Beck effects his audience more and his demagoguery against Muslims is even worse.
 
kill their leaders and convert them to Christians...

Yeah, I know, that was Coulter but let's not quibble over such details.

She'd be such a great policy maker.
Shame she's on the sidelines.

Who was it again that said:
'To Ann Coulter, the renaissance is something that happened to other people.'

She's just sooooooo 1492.
 
Fear sells, and O'Reilly is in the market of fear. It simply sells more when O'Reilly markets Islamic terrorism as more prevalent and more dangerous than it is. I know plenty of conservatives who think that all Muslims are bad people trying to take over the US. Seriously, they are not being hyperbolic. They truly believe that the kindly Muslim living amongst us is secretely rooting for the downfall of the US and the Koran directs their followers to lie to us westerners to advance their faith. There are plenty of conservatives who believe this.

<snip>

You make it sound like a commonly held opinion among conservatives. I don't know any who genuinely believe this.

Can you quantify what you mean by 'plenty'? I would be surprised to find solid evidence that anyone other than the most fringe conservatives hold such opinions. (But I'll keep an open mind about it if you have said evidence.)
 
You make it sound like a commonly held opinion among conservatives. I don't know any who genuinely believe this.

Can you quantify what you mean by 'plenty'? I would be surprised to find solid evidence that anyone other than the most fringe conservatives hold such opinions. (But I'll keep an open mind about it if you have said evidence.)

Feel free to surf some conservative forums and you will see what I mean. Freeconservatives.com comes to mind, as well as Hannity.com. I would admit that they inhabitants of said sites could be construed as fringe conservatives.
 
The most common lie from Bill O'Reilly -- "I'll give you the last word."

Almost every interview where he disagrees he says this and then doesn't do it. I always think of this when Bill-O challenges someone to, "tell me one instance where I've lied."
 
Feel free to surf some conservative forums and you will see what I mean. Freeconservatives.com comes to mind, as well as Hannity.com. I would admit that they inhabitants of said sites could be construed as fringe conservatives.


Id have to agree that there are more people than I would have thought that subscribe to views in line with Beck and Oreilly. Here in Orange County Ca I have met quite a few and worked with several. Alot of them speak with an anger and in some cases rage towards some perceived liberal conspiracy. Guy I used to work for went on a 10min rant on what a liberal scumbag Soros and Dell are and how liberals have effed everything in America and NPR is some liberal propaganda machine. :eek: :eye-poppi
 
I fear the extremism of the American Christian Right these days a damn sight more than the extremism of Islam.
 
Well, O'Reilly isn't known for having much understanding when it comes to people that don't look and act like him. And I don't mean emotional understanding, I mean intellectual understanding. This is the same guy that (apparently) perceives the phrase "happy holidays" as attacking Christmas, and was surprised that black people ate at a restaurant like civilized human beings. SO if he says a hot mess when it comes to muslims, well, par for the course.

One thing I did notice about this "muslim problem around the world"...uh, how many of those people killed in the umpteen thousand terrorist attacks are, themselves, muslims? O'Reilly talks and talks about Iran, but that's not a "muslim" problem, it's a "Iranian political leadership" problem. If they're attacking Iraqis and causing problems for their neighbors, then Iran is mostly a problems *for* muslims.
 
If he took his point of view seriously, wouldn't he be advocating and supporting 'moderate Muslims'? Maybe help build a mosque or two?
 
Jewish Question
German Problem
Palestinian Problem
Muslim Problem

all of these ethnic "problems"...usually lead to bad news.
 
Did you stand up and walk out on O'Reilly when he continued to hammer on the "Muslim problem"?

There is a Muslim problem. There is a Christian problem. There is a radical left problem. There is a radical right problem. And a host of other problems too numerous to mention in a quick reply.

Ball of confusion. That's what the world is today. Ball of buttheaded political bitch-ass confusion.

So why get all tore up about O'Reilly hammering on the Muslim problem? Me? I'd be hammering on all of you. You all look alike to me. And if those ignorant sluts hadn't stood up on O'Reilly when he (soon-to-be-illegally) omitted the "radical" qualifier, the whole ridiculous queersome bruhaha never would have happened. There would simply have been a passing reference to "Muslims" attacking us on 9/11, and that would have been the end of it.

But now look what the ignorant sluts have done. Now there is no end to it. On and on and on the silly bruhaha goes.

Look. The ignorant sluts asked O'Reilly why 70% of Americans don't want the mosque near GZ. He adequately answered their question. Oh, but he forgot to say "radical".

Get over it, learn to live with it, get a life, move on.
 

Back
Top Bottom