• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 5

OntarioSquatch said:
It could be the single best piece of evidence.
Click to expand...
If your best piece of evidence is a guy in a suit, it's screw city for bigfootery.
It's either that or the various patterns that can be seen across thousands of reports.
Click to expand...
Yes, yes. What sort of evil genius could read a BFRO report and type something similar. It's almost impossible.
 
OntarioSquatch said:
The copy of frame 352 that I posted was obtained by MK Davis from Patricia Patterson's copy of the film. He paid to get high quality scans of several different frames of the film at a photo lab. Frame 352 was one of them.

Frame 61 is from Bill Munn's inventory of Cibachrome scans. There's a few more from that copy that I can post if you want.
Click to expand...

QED
 
OS,

Well, when you have spent a lifetime looking for the subject and have completely and totally come up empty (with the subsequent feelings of frustration and dejection)...

...come back here and we'll let you know the reason for the failure.
 
HghrSymmetry said:
OS,

Well, when you have spent a lifetime looking for the subject and have completely and totally come up empty (with the subsequent feelings of frustration and dejection)...

...come back here and we'll let you know the reason for the failure.
Click to expand...

He feels that a discovery can happen within the next 3 years, but isn't willing to bet on it. Ironically, OS doesn't seem to have much more confidence in it being him or his "team" who make said discovery...despite having supposedly encountered Bigfoot on a couple of occasions.
 
You're mistaking me for someone else. I've never had any encounters and I'm not on any kind of research team.
 
OntarioSquatch said:
You're mistaking me for someone else. I've never had any encounters and I'm not on any kind of research team.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure you've rambled on before about going out into the woods with people, and that's all I essentially meant, as there are no valid "research" teams out there who're thick enough to go looking for a figment of Roger Patterson's imagination. Didn't you have a thermal sighting, or is that Northern Lights? I remember the first time I smoked some Northern Lights, didn't see a single Squatch.
 
OntarioSquatch,

How many female Bigfeet have been spotted by anyone who sees them?
All of the research I have done (meaning reading some of the same stuff you do)
barely mentions any Bigfeet with the mid torso breasts. :covereyes

Have you done any research here at International Skeptics or when it was JREF?

Bill Munns came here and it ended in tears. (Bill Munns refused to share any of his
work.)

It was quite educational for me. It showed me quite clearly what someone will do or
say to keep the illusion going. :eye-poppi

PS Did you answer my question about your experience with guns?
 
Gilbert Syndrome said:
He feels that a discovery can happen within the next 3 years, but isn't willing to bet on it. Ironically, OS doesn't seem to have much more confidence in it being him or his "team" who make said discovery...despite having supposedly encountered Bigfoot on a couple of occasions.
Click to expand...

Interesting.
 
The Golden Age of the Bigfoot Fetish is over. It's downhill from here and everyone knows it. When everyone in the woods has a cellphone with camera the excuses for no pictures or video devolve from special pleading to kicking and screaming. Sure, you can walk around the woods with a thermal camera and pretend to be hunting as they do on Finding Bigfoot but eventually even the stupidest Footies will notice that they never find anything.
 
It used to be that cell phone cameras were crap. That was the reigning excuse. Practically every cell phone sold today does high res pictures and 720p video.
 
Bigfilter has conspired with bigcamera to digitally exclude bigfoot from all exposure. Look for the tell-tale shrubbery or suggestive logs that cover him.
 
OntarioSquatch said:
I believe his claim of having photos and videos because of the details of his encounters and the investigation that occurred, not because he claims to have photos and videos.
Click to expand...

Isn't this the same logical fallacy you criticized earlier? You are making a decision regarding the veracity of a video/film based on outside factors rather than on the video evidence itself. At least those who don't believe the PGF have at least seen it.
 
Here the sole appears to be square at the heel. It is generally regarded as an illusion.
062b8a5a.jpg



Here the sole appears to be ovoid. It is generally regarded as an illusion
f0cf8956.gif



Here the toes appear to be flexing upwards. It is generally regarded as not being an illusion. I think it needs to be further examined as being another illusion.
kF6g_zpsbfc6880a.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom