Oystein
did invite Jango to search for old threads if he wanted to discuss other issues than the LC forum deroute
Yes, but didn't mean to have several resurrected.
I think the general topic of "what did the servcices know and do pre-9/11 / who are they covering post-9/11" has been started several times, but never reached a state of maturity like some of the old more technical topics did. Hence good posts are scattered throughout several old thread.
The way that
I would do this (being an experienced member here), it this:
1. Either find the best or most recent appropriate thread, or start over in a new thread
2. Link to and/or quote good posts from other threads in that one thread
I think Jango is putting in some serious effort, he is listening to advice, and he is not promoting any claims that are obviously junk. I for one am quite willing learn the arguments and counter-arguments on a field of 9/11-related politics that, in my view, have so far received somewhat less attention here.
A while ago we (the JREF regulars) pretty drove away shure and jimd3100 with a barrage of bordeline-abusive attacks that often lacked substance. I pray that we wise up and meet Jango with respect.
If he makes claims of fact that you think are false, point out what is false and refute it with evidence.
If you think he is missing vital information, provide it.
If you think that he draws conclusions that do not follow from the facts, explain it.
If your opinions on the political implications differ from his, feel free to voice yours, but be sure to differentiate between opinions and claims of fact.