• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

BBC 9/11 Documentary Likely Hit Piece

The Doc

Curing Stupidity
The Doc
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Messages
2,158
Score one for the good guys :)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/150207bbcdocumentary.htm

Although I am a little skeptical of Prison Planet, I can see what they are saying.

Many posters to the 9/11 Blogger site were skeptical of the show's balance and fear it could be one of the most sophisticated attacks on the 9/11 truth movement to date, using nebulous strawman tactics that elevate unproven theories about hologram planes, exotic weaponry and Jewish conspirators above hardcore evidence.​
"Judging from my experience with (producer) Guy Smith, this will be a hit piece," stated one.
Click to expand...

Thoughts?

(I was going to post this is the current BBC thread but I thought separate article, separate thread)
 
CTer "Hit Piece" = Anything that accurately reflects the stupidity of their claims.
 
or maybe there is a letter 's' missing in that statement somewhere?
 
Another tactic is likely to be constant reference to NIST and the 9/11 Commission in an attempt to debunk every question raised by "conspiracy theorists,"
Click to expand...

Now I know it's going to be accurate.
 
i sense a paradox, arr 4$"(!? sounds to me like it's going to be "a balanced piece", so balanced it will give the CTers too much credit, to prevent arguments or for popularity.
 
If this is about the BBC Conspiracies series then thats exactly what the show will show...various conspiracies about what ever topic it is the show is covering.

These morons cannot pick and choose which conspiracies represent their movement since their movement is all about conspiracies in the first place.

Mailman
 
Alan: standard Beeb behaviour with this sort of program is to devote the first section of the show to covering the conspiracies before utterly demolishing them. So nobody panic if it's looking a bit woo to begin with, K?
 
Rich M said:
Alan: standard Beeb behaviour with this sort of program is to devote the first section of the show to covering the conspiracies before utterly demolishing them. So nobody panic if it's looking a bit woo to begin with, K?
Click to expand...

Seconded, however I can guarantee that clips of eth first half will show up in CT "documentaries" to try and indicate that the BBC supports troofieness.
 
I remember when South Park laid a 30 minute smack-down to the CT'ers Dylan Avery thought they were secretly supporting him lol.
 
scissorhands said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6368341.stm

Looks like they will examine the underlying psychology of woo.
Click to expand...
From that article:

BBC said:
But the deeper you dig in the dark world of conspiracies, the more you realise that different theories share much in common. The conspiracy theorist seizes on any apparent inconsistency and from that germ of truth the story is built up.

What happened to the white car apparently involved in Diana's accident? Was there a second gunman on the Grassy Knoll? And why did it take so long to scramble US fighters on 9/11?
Click to expand...
That bodes well, I think.
 
a_unique_person said:
"Hologram Planes"? How much fun have I been missing out on?
Click to expand...

Death rays, hologram planes, explosive paint, therm(a/i)te doing all sorts of acrobatic things, remote contolled collapsing lamp posts, drones, missles, government disinfo agents, fake fires in PA, fake phone calls, air to air missle batteries at the pentagon, growing truther revolution, impossible manuvers, faked flight data recorders, controlled demolition, people secretly being moved off planes to be resettled / killed, ISI connections to UBL, UBL being a CIA agent, UBL imposters, faster than freefall collapses, near freefall collapses, lack of fires at WTC 7, buildings falling into their own footprint, joos did it, neocons did it, PNAC did it, Gravy did it...any thing I missed?
 
Kage said:
...any thing I missed?
Click to expand...

WTC demolished by magical minature nukes that create no EMP and generate no other radiation emissions or fallout. Or explosions in the basement that cause the building to collapse from the top down sometime later.
 
Just an aside, when I appeared on the BBC radio program, the interviewer mentioned before the taping that his typical job was to play the devil's advocate with the people representing both sides of an issue, but that he didn't feel much like it in this instance.

I think it gets back to the polling data, which clearly shows that the folks who buy into this nonsense tend to be the least educated and the young (aka, the least wise).
 
I hope this will be available on Youtube, as I am not sure we get BBC2 here in Canuckland.

TAM
 
More preemptive BS here

Posted by a regular Looser moron Twist_U_Up at DU:

BBC LEAK! Battle over Sunday's 9/11 documentary

Will this Sunday's BBC documentary whitewash 9/11?
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=7030

Thanks to a dedicated poster and campaigner on this forum (whose name is associated with the initials SG), I put this together and sent it round my e-mail list. I believe Ian Crane is also posting something, so you might like to wait for that as well.

Review - and decide on your action:

=============================

We have discovered from a source inside the BBC that there are 2 versions or "edits" of the upcoming conspiracies documentary - one of which is a "whitewash" version. Our source tells us the guy pushing for the Whitewash Version to be broadcast is GARTH ANCIER:

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2013028,00.html
He was in the Guardian YESTERDAY. Coincidence?
Action:

e-mail the addresses below, and any others you may be aware with a message like the one below. Let them know we know the gist of the game. We know from our source there are people in the BBC pushing for the truth to come out - so let's hear it for them. Well, what are you waiting for?

---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

HelenBoaden.Complaints@bbc.co.uk
vine@bbc.co.uk
1_6_10feedback@bbc.co.uk
info@bbc.co.uk
guy.smith@bbc.co.uk
mike.rudin@bbc.co.uk

and any other BBC ones you can think of! (or re-work the message below to send to other organisations)

You can also call Television Centre on 0208 743 8000 to find out more and lobby those who decide these things.


---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

Dear Sir/Madam,

We have discovered from a source within the BBC that there are 2 versions of the upcoming "Conspiracies" documentary about 9/11. We understand that there are people in the BBC who want the truth to come out and other ones that don't. We understand that the main person backing the "whitewash" version is Mr Garth Ancier.

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2013028,00.html

Of course, as you will realise, this calls into question the standards of professionalism, journalism, honesty and integrity which seem to be at work in the BBC. We KNOW 9/11 was an inside job, and however many times David Icke or "No Planes" is mentioned in relation to it, it will not detract from the smoking guns which more and more people have now seen and understand.

We therefore strongly advise that the "honest" version is broadcast on Sunday, because if it is not, the BBC's reputation as a news broadcasting entity will be forever tarnished or destroyed. Clearly, we must also call into question the motives of an executive who can (or is trying to) influence what is to be broadcast, and this matter will need serious review also.

As you may know, William Rodriguez, Decorated hero and survivor of the World Trade Centre Disaster, is speaking around the UK. His testimony blows apart the official story of 9/11 and this will likely have been heard and read by 10s or 100s of thousands of people by the end of this month.

So, we know what the game is, and we are now "calling your bluff". We are watching you and waiting for your response.

Yours Sincerely,
_________________
Andrew

Ask the Tough Questions, Folks!
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom