• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Barrertt claims no one willing to debate him and Ryan in 2007

Lenbrazil

Muse
L
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
974
"In 2007, University of Michigan students brought me and Kevin Ryan to campus to debate 9/11 with one or more of their professors. Thousands of invitations were issued and more than 1000 DVDs given away. The only responses were from two engineering professors, both of whom privately admitted that the World Trade Center was obviously destroyed by controlled demolition, but that stating this in public would threaten their careers. Since no opposition could be found, Kevin Ryan and I staged our own debate, taking turns attacking and defending the 9/11 Commission Report and the NIST Report on the Twin Towers".

http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/2010/10/debunking-911-dad-debunking.html

Does anybody know anything about this? It doesn't smell right. I'm guessing they imposed some absurd preconditions.
 
This supposedly happened three years ago and he's just now getting around to posting something about it? Mystery engineering professors confessing privately that they think WTC was a CD to a known truther and not admitting to it publicly to this day? Reeks of pure fiction to this untrained observer.
 
How do you tell the difference between qualified engineers who are not willing to reveal their identities for fear of their careers, and fictitious people someone just made up?

Fortunately, there is a way. Actual qualified engineers not willing to reveal their identities for fear of their careers could still provide a detailed professional quality technical argument based on sound engineering principles supporting their claims. Fictitious people someone just made up cannot.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
While this wasn't an engineering professor, Barrett tried to pick a fight with law professor Ann Althouse some years back, and she blew him off fiercelyi. Barrett's just trying to make himself look better. Fact of the matter is, he's viewed as a kook.

i. More info in the last 4 posts at this thread in Althouse's blog: http://althouse.blogspot.com/2008/02/i-hope-this-gets-you-fired-youre.html. She ended up replying to Barrett by sending him a link to the Wisconsin law regarding email harrassment. Best respnse she could've made.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom