theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
Has anybody read this book? I tried.
My conclusion: This is philosophy, not smut. People write smut to titillate themselves, or to titillate some demographic that will form a paying audience. You write adultery porn for people who like that sort of thing. You write minotaur porn for people who like that sort of thing. Etc.
De Sade isn't trying to write something titillating for a particular audience. He's trying to lay out as comprehensive a catalog of perversion and obscenity as he can possibly imagine. Every reader can probably find one or two tropes in there that turn them on, in addition to the other 99% of the tropes in the book, that will leave them cold, or disgusted, or horrified.
A closer reading might discover some trenchant socio-political commentary, but I confess I have no desire to read it any more closely or completely than I've already attempted.
Anyway, on to the question of banning. Or "banning" as is more correct to say. Personally, I think there's something impressive, even admirable, in putting down on paper such a work of disgusting sexual depravity. Someone should catalog our most horrific taboos and predilections, from time to time. For this reason, I think it has philosophical, literary, and artistic merit. Universities should make an effort to include a copy in their catalog, and make it available to students and the public without judgement. I think national libraries (i.e., institutions like the Library of Congress) should preserve copies as part of the historical record.
I think public libraries (county libraries, municipal libraries, etc.) should probably think very carefully about whether they want to keep a copy on their shelves, and how tightly to restrict its circulation. Even public libraries that maintain a complete collection of Playboy Magazine (are there any such libraries?) probably don't loan issues out to schoolchildren.
I don't think the book has any place in high school or elementary school libraries. School budgets and shelf space a much better spent on other, more germane works.
ETA: I hope I wouldn't have to tell public school librarians not to put in in their catalog. If that turns out to be too optimistic, I have no qualms about firing any public school librarian or administrator that thought having it was a good idea, and passing whatever laws necessary to make it absolutely clear that such nonsense will not be tolerated in public schools.
What do you think?
My conclusion: This is philosophy, not smut. People write smut to titillate themselves, or to titillate some demographic that will form a paying audience. You write adultery porn for people who like that sort of thing. You write minotaur porn for people who like that sort of thing. Etc.
De Sade isn't trying to write something titillating for a particular audience. He's trying to lay out as comprehensive a catalog of perversion and obscenity as he can possibly imagine. Every reader can probably find one or two tropes in there that turn them on, in addition to the other 99% of the tropes in the book, that will leave them cold, or disgusted, or horrified.
A closer reading might discover some trenchant socio-political commentary, but I confess I have no desire to read it any more closely or completely than I've already attempted.
Anyway, on to the question of banning. Or "banning" as is more correct to say. Personally, I think there's something impressive, even admirable, in putting down on paper such a work of disgusting sexual depravity. Someone should catalog our most horrific taboos and predilections, from time to time. For this reason, I think it has philosophical, literary, and artistic merit. Universities should make an effort to include a copy in their catalog, and make it available to students and the public without judgement. I think national libraries (i.e., institutions like the Library of Congress) should preserve copies as part of the historical record.
I think public libraries (county libraries, municipal libraries, etc.) should probably think very carefully about whether they want to keep a copy on their shelves, and how tightly to restrict its circulation. Even public libraries that maintain a complete collection of Playboy Magazine (are there any such libraries?) probably don't loan issues out to schoolchildren.
I don't think the book has any place in high school or elementary school libraries. School budgets and shelf space a much better spent on other, more germane works.
ETA: I hope I wouldn't have to tell public school librarians not to put in in their catalog. If that turns out to be too optimistic, I have no qualms about firing any public school librarian or administrator that thought having it was a good idea, and passing whatever laws necessary to make it absolutely clear that such nonsense will not be tolerated in public schools.
What do you think?
Last edited: