Augmentation of Gravitational and Geomagnetic Fields

[kinkymagic]

I would post the url, but I don't have 15 posts yet. You can probably find it if you google it. Also, I wasn't sure whether this should go in here or science, so I apologise if I made a mistake.

Experimental Data Demonstrating the Effect

Experimental Data Demonstrating Augmentation of Ambient Gravitational and Geomagnetic Fields

Danielle Graham
NW Frontier Research Institute

Abstract: Despite significant documentation and rigorously controlled conditions, most research involving extraordinary human-generated phenomena (e.g. remote viewing, teleportation, etc.) has focused either upon the observation of the macrophenomena itself, or cumulative statistical deviation from chance. This paper, however, examines the influences upon and augmentation of ambient gravitational and geomagnetic fields, a previously unobserved and unrecognized concomitant physics phenomenon during activities requiring singular and total concentration. Utilizing simple field measurement instrumentation, original experimental data is presented, discussed, and compared with controlled baselines. Whereas some previous research has examined the influence of ambient fields upon human subjects, published literature is sparse concerning the influence of human subjects specifically upon ambient fields. As well, research that rigorously pursued the study of the effects of indirect human interference on engineering instrumentation did not consider ambient fields for experimental control, perhaps limiting potential theoretical modeling and integration. The presented empirical data demonstrates that gravitational and geomagnetic field augmentation occurring during such all-consuming activity is neither incidental nor subtle and may well be a worthy consideration for modeling frontier scientific theories and expanding current physics paradigms. Insomuch as natural, human-generated phenomena currently stand as the most accessible and repeatable examples of anomalous environmental interactivity, this data and suggested research protocols presented offer exploratory perspectives for observing the underlying scientific principals and physics concepts of ambient field interface as well as potential applications in developing more effective theoretical models for frontier space science.

Space Technology and Applications International Forum 2006
3rd Symposium on New Frontiers and Future Concepts
[F07] Advanced Technologies for Terrestrial (Earth, Lunar, Mars) Based Propulsion and Power Concepts - II

AIP Conference-Paper Reference Link
©2006 American Institute of Physics

Anyone want to field this one?

 

[JLam]

I don't care to field it, but here's the URL:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/425/1/

 

[Ersby]

Here's the link to the abstract:

http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/425/1/

And this page has a link to a streamed video showing someone meditate on scales while the weight fluctuates.

http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/433/1

The thing that bothers me is, the video begins by them asking the meditator to move slightly to see how that effects the readings on the scales, and from then on the readings never go beyond the limits of how much the reading change when he moved. I'd guess he's moving very slightly.

Another odd thing is that in the description for the video it says the meditator "seems to lose 1 pound", while in the video itself, the people point out that the reading says he's lost about a quarter of a pound.

 

[wipeout]

The abstract gives me a headache. And it mentions paradigms. Oh noes.

Another article talks about flux capacitors. I thought that sounded familiar and it turns out it's what powers the De Lorean in the Back to the Future movies.

 

[eri]

How the heck did they measure the graviational field changes? And which gravitational field to the contribute it to - the Earth? The person?

 

[eri]

OK, I watched part of the video. Looks like they're not measuring gravitational force per se, but just the general force - the amount of Newtons on the scale. It sounds to me like they may be misinterpretting the information they're getting. The scale will measure Force, or Mass*Acceleration - but not only graviational acceleration. Because they're seeing changes in the force, they seem to be interpretting this as changes in the gravitational constant.

The presented empirical data demonstrates that gravitational and geomagnetic field augmentation occurring during such all-consuming activity is neither incidental nor subtle and may well be a worthy consideration for modeling frontier scientific theories and expanding current physics paradigms.

However, all they are seeing in the larger fluctuations - when the guy is moving slightly - is an increase in the total acceleration * mass - not a change in his mass, but a change in his acceleration, which is now not only g (from gravity) but g+a (gravity plus his moving at a non-constant velocity). Even if he moves at a fairly constant velocity (no acceleration) he still must speed up to that velocity and down from it again, causing an acceleration besides that of gravity.

So nothing new here - I guess they never asked any actual scientists to take a look at it. I wonder if they did any controls with people in a non-meditative state.