Are the Chinese Especially Puritanical?

I'd say they are simply old-fashioned. Moral standards (sex-moral, that is) are somewhere in the 19th century. The single-child policy has not exactly helped.

They don't need a pretext for political censoring, they do that quite openly.

Hans
 
"Old-fashioned"? I guess that's one way to put it, although that would imply that the more technologically advanced they become, the less "old-fashioned" they would be.
 
I don't think so. Their Cat. III movies have been quite graphic for over 20 years and they don't censor nudity in them.
 
Yes, the old guard - e.g. the ones running the country and thus of the older generation - are rather puritanical. But their approach is sort of medieval; husband = provider and he's just bound to be human and have foibles and need some releases for his energy, after all, wink wink nudge nudge.

The tradition of the syau tai tai (literally "little wife" - e.g. "mistress") is still very real in moneyed circles in China. But the understanding is that daddy's supposed to still be a good provider to the family and go home to them, and that for all things public, his actual wife and children are his family, regardless how long he's been with the syau tai tai (or that he's bought her a condo and/or pays her more than he pays his lawyer).

But the sexuality issue has nothing to do with this, really. The public face is the porn filtering. The less public face is their ongoing battle to stem the free flow of information. It's a losing battle, but they will continue because it's in their nature to try to protect what they have - their positions.

The manipulation of the CCTV report is interesting. Not just that they're manipulating the story but that there are sufficient bloggers out there who caught them at it and are spreading the story. This is why I say it's a losing battle. As they've learned in Thailand - you can't shut it down completely. News and opinion will get out. They're trying to hold back history. Unless they get out there and take away computers by gunpoint and launch into a massive repressive campaign, they cannot do it. They may keep it up for a while, but it's a holding action.
 
Puritanism is a Western thing. From what little I know, I don’t think the Chinese quite operate on that cultural axis. It’s more a matter of them falling much further along the authoritariansm spectrum – all kinds of behaviour, including sexuality, must be tightly controlled for the good of social cohesion.

It’s interesting to see Chinese internet commentary on blogs and boards – I know a great deal of it is generated by official sources (check out all the ‘independent’ mentions of Kent State when people started talking about Tiananmen Square a bit ago), but it does suggest a view that if you give people even the slightest bit of license anywhere the whole of society will fall to pieces.
 
Puppycow said:
"Old-fashioned"? I guess that's one way to put it, although that would imply that the more technologically advanced they become, the less "old-fashioned" they would be.
Click to expand...
Ehr, in principle, a society could be hard-core Victorian, plus very technologically advanced (just look at certain parts of the USA).

Puritanism is a Western thing. From what little I know, I don’t think the Chinese quite operate on that cultural axis.
Click to expand...

I beg to differ. Puritanism is a human thing. I assume it originally stems partly from the need to make sure (for males) that the kids you feed are the ones you sired, plus the general tendency in more complex societies to try to control human urges.

However, puritanism has been implemented in different ways in different cultures. Western cultures use religion, Eastern cultures use ethics. And in all cultures, those in wealth and/or power have a more comfortable version.

Hans
 
why bothering about censoring porn on the Internet?
just cut the backbone lines.... as if there is anything left once you cencor out the porn.... :D
 
Dictator Cheney said:
why bothering about censoring porn on the Internet?
just cut the backbone lines.... as if there is anything left once you cencor out the porn.... :D
Click to expand...
Not an available option. You cannot run a modern industrial nation without internet access.

Hans
 
An acquaintance of mine is working in Shanghai, the stories I hear are far from puritanical. :)

Aside from that: There's this Dutch philosopher -C.W. Rietdijk- who has the theory that authoritarian regimes and religions repress sexuality because it channels peoples energy towards love of abstract structures such as the church or the state.

Free sexual morals are thus seen as sign of decline because they reduce loyalty to the state. According to him, the powers that be instinctively realise that and ban free sexual expression.
 
Eddie Dane said:
An acquaintance of mine is working in Shanghai, the stories I hear are far from puritanical. :)

Aside from that: There's this Dutch philosopher -C.W. Rietdijk- who has the theory that authoritarian regimes and religions repress sexuality because it channels peoples energy towards love of abstract structures such as the church or the state.

Free sexual morals are thus seen as sign of decline because they reduce loyalty to the state. According to him, the powers that be instinctively realise that and ban free sexual expression.
Click to expand...

I guess that explains Singapore, Thailand, Cambodia, and Viet Nam, then.
Taiwan under Chiang Kai Shek? One of the most ribald countries.

Maybe he needs to rethink that theory?

ETA: As to your friend in Shanghai? Yes, I mentioned that it's the ruling classes who are of the old school. The younger generation is about as free, sexually, as young people in the west.
 
Last edited:
Foolmewunz said:
I guess that explains Singapore, Thailand, Cambodia, and Viet Nam, then.
Taiwan under Chiang Kai Shek? One of the most ribald countries.

Maybe he needs to rethink that theory?

ETA: As to your friend in Shanghai? Yes, I mentioned that it's the ruling classes who are of the old school. The younger generation is about as free, sexually, as young people in the west.
Click to expand...

For the record: I think it's a cute theory.
But I never tried to falsify it, and suspected that it wouldn't stand up to scrutiny. I guess you just blew it out of the water.

Damn! Now my wife will never let me go to Thailand.
 
MRC_Hans said:
I beg to differ. Puritanism is a human thing. I assume it originally stems partly from the need to make sure (for males) that the kids you feed are the ones you sired
Click to expand...

That sounds like a good old sociobiological ‘just-so story’ to me. I could equally say that the female desire to get their offspring fed by whatever males – or indeed females – are handy is a driver for extreme promiscuity.

MRC_Hans said:
plus the general tendency in more complex societies to try to control human urges.
Click to expand...

And that’s just vague. The words ‘complex’, ‘general tendency’ and ‘human urges’ in that sentence are all to a greater or lesser extent cultural constructs.

MRC_Hans said:
However, puritanism has been implemented in different ways in different cultures.
Click to expand...

The desire to control sexual behaviour has existed in some way in many human societies, but ‘Puritanism’ doesn’t just mean that – its a word for a particular kind of European religious outlook, involving the inherent belief that the body generally is corrupt and evil. Using the word in a discussion about Asian attitudes to sex is unhelpful in that it ‘smuggles in’ all sorts of assumptions about shame and repression which don’t necessarily apply.
 
Matt, I don't think Puppycow really thinks that the Chinese are really 16th Century English Protestant Conservative Puritans (with the upper case P). It's also a euphemism for prudish or "up tight, sexually".
 
"Aside from that: There's this Dutch philosopher -C.W. Rietdijk- who has the theory that authoritarian regimes and religions repress sexuality because it channels peoples energy towards love of abstract structures such as the church or the state. "

Don't know that much about it, but I seem to remember from reading biographies like Wild Swans and Red Azalia a while back that during revolutionary times romantic love and the attendant sexuality that goes with it were considered bourguoise because one was meant to love the party and the revolution more than mere people, not to say that what went on in private was as puritanical; think of the thriving sex industry in victorian england. I seem to remember a documentary about how Mao would like to take his pick of the young Red Guard members too.

But in public in those days I got the impression that Reitdijk's theory seemed quite apt.

No idea about the modern culture though.
 
Just to reaffirm and expand on what FMW has been saying; when Chinese Communism started, one of the principles was that Communism (as interpreted by the leaders of that time) essentially defined all aspects of life. It wasn't just a political system, it also defined desirable morals and ethics.

Even today, every two years or so, China will go through a "moral purity" campaign of some kind. Defining what kind of clothing is acceptable in public, or how much physical affection can be shown, or all sorts of other things.

The average young Chinese person (ie. under 30 yrs. old) tends not to ascribe to such values any more, but the older generation certainly does.

However, in regard to the internet thing, it isn't really as much a moral issue as it is a control issue. Censoring the internet for porn is not going to get the gov't a lot of opposition from overseas. Some people might make noises, but its not going to be a major human rights issue. Thus, gov't attempts at internet control and censorship always tend to revolve around issues of 'cracking down on pornography'.

This recent thing with the Chinese gov't attempting to have special software pre-installed on all Chinese computers in order to control what they can access online is a good example. It was promoted primarily as a way of preventing porn; but left open huge holes that could be exploited to prevent access to any kind of content that the gov't deemed undesirable. The gov't's plan was to require that this software be pre-installed on all computers sold in China.

But there's another side to the story, one that wasn't mentioned so much in the world media. This decision by the gov't caused a huge uproar in China, with tens of millions of people protesting online. University campuses were in an uproar. The people said, quite resoundingly, that they would not accept this.

And the gov't did back down. They changed their policy, and now say that all computers must be sold with a CD that has the software in question, but it is up to the individual user whether or not they want to install it (the vast majority will not).
 
Dictator Cheney said:
and this has to do with China what exactly? :D
Click to expand...
(on China being a modern industrial nation)

When were you last in China? Perhaps you are stil nursing the old images of thousands of bikes and parading kindergarten kids with wooden rifles and Mao unifirms? Perhaps the picture below of Beijing by night will change your perspective (It's a few years old, actually, and the murky area to the right is now filed with brand new high-rise buildings).

Hans
 

Attachments

  • DSC01860.JPG
    DSC01860.JPG
    42.9 KB · Views: 11
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom