Yes, the are necesserily sphrical. Always.
No they are not spherical if they have spin
Amy Barger:
"[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica]If we could 'see' black holes, they would be of two different types," Barger says. "One type would have the symmetry of a sphere. The other type would have the symmetry of a top. The latter type of black hole possesses the axial-symmetric shape because it has spin."
from http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mystery_monday_030901.html
[/FONT]
Wikipedia said:Rotating black holes have distorted, nonspherical event horizons.
Yes, the are necesserily sphrical. Always.
But in the case of a binary pair the pull would not be uniform, would it?The reason is due to a uniform gravitational pull, which nothing can escape apart from virtual particles and hypothetical tachyons. The uniform pull does not differ on area part of the surface area of the black hole.
But in the case of a binary pair the pull would not be uniform, would it?
Do I interpret this correctly as you having thought spin not to have any noticeable effect on the black hole's structure, due to the vastly greater strength of the gravitational force?I had usually spin not to be so effective on the black holes structure, again due to the gravitational strength.
I'm not sure what you mean by them being "pulled together uniformly". But the important thing isn't how the black holes are being pulled, is it? The question is how other things are affected by the gravitational force from the holes, and I do not think it will decrease uniformly with radial distance in the binary example.If anything, they would be pulled together uniformly. Objects moving close to black holes are in a state of free fall.
That might be true-ish: I don't know if any black hole will rotate enough to differ very much from the spherical in practice.
But in the case of a binary pair, won't there be at least a short while, as they spiral in towards each other, when they are very noticeably non-spherical?
No, not uniformly. There will be tidal forces.If anything, they would be pulled together uniformly. Objects moving close to black holes are in a state of free fall.
Once nice thing about Sing is you can always rely on him to be wrong.... no, they certainly are not always spherical. Rotating black holes (and all real black holes will be rotating at least a little) are not spherical. Black holes that have just absorbed something are not spherical. Black holes merging are not spherical. Etc.
In general they behave not unlike droplets.
What happens if you try to make it spin faster?It's not. There is a limit to how much a black hole with a given mass can spin, called the extremal limit. Near that limit the shape and spacetime structure of the hole is very different from that of a non-rotating one, and it is believed that nearly all astrophysical black holes come close to saturating the limit.
Cool, what happens then?Yep - and after they've merged.