• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anyone want to make a quick G?

Hmm, well conveniently, I live in Seattle. Could use the money for Christmas presents, and beer.
 
I've never seen a truther explain how adding explosives creates a uniquely different scenario that allows for faster-than-freefall whereas natural collapse does not. Are they claiming explosives in the top of the building blew lower parts of the building down, or that the CIA has invented explosives that can suck the building down faster-than G from the bottom? I don't think they've really thought that one through. (I'm shocked)
 
His money is safe. There's no way to explain what happened using only a thirteen year olds understanding. That is what he wants.

Nothing fancy required. No calculus, no complicated formulas, just 8th-grade science class Scientific Method with the basic understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion that we started seeing in After School Special cartoons when we were five years old.
 
Ya know, maybe these truthers are onto something. :rolleyes:

Isn't it wierd that he focuses on one very specific aspect of the collapse of the building? It's almost as if he's saying, "yes I agree with every other fact that refutes the inside job scenario, except for this one". Truthers are so strange to think that the events of 9/11 are completely exlusive of one another. As if proving x+y=z also proves that q+7=hamburgers.
 
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the claim that there was "2.2 seconds of gravitational free fall of WTC 7 that the National Institute of Standards and Technologies admitted to have occurred" is grossly simplified and therefore his money is pretty safe.
 
Would love to see the video if anyone actually takes him up on this. Then again, I've read and still have a .pdf copy of the building 7 NIST report.. perhaps if I grab some boxes and start dropping them with an explanation regarding building 7 then that would class as convincing "8th-grade" science and persuade him to give me $1000 :-)

We all know, a guy this into himself, there is no way anyone will change his mind, and sure as hell no way way he will admit to being wrong (and systematically make himself look like a muppet in the public arena). His money is safe through is ignorance and stubbornness.
 
Last edited:
omg lol from Benshoof himself:

"a fact is a fact, whether my two year old states it, or your mother. If it isn't a fact, then you should refute it with facts"

LMAO so according to this guy a fact remains a fact unless it is proven wrong. So if I was to say flight 93 disappeared into a wormhole and exited into another dimension, this is a fact until somebody can prove to me it isn't. I bet you $1000 you can't prove me wrong!!!

:dl:
 
omg lol from Benshoof himself:

"a fact is a fact, whether my two year old states it, or your mother. If it isn't a fact, then you should refute it with facts"

LMAO so according to this guy a fact remains a fact unless it is proven wrong. So if I was to say flight 93 disappeared into a wormhole and exited into another dimension, this is a fact until somebody can prove to me it isn't. I bet you $1000 you can't prove me wrong!!!

:dl:

Yeah-huh!!!
The airplane would not have survived being crushed at the point of singularity, only the Infamous Indestructible Black Box!
Said box is now floating in the other dimension, but it will probably be discovered soon by the Reptiloids and returned to us after their conquest. :D
 
Yeah-huh!!!
The airplane would not have survived being crushed at the point of singularity, only the Infamous Indestructible Black Box!
Said box is now floating in the other dimension, but it will probably be discovered soon by the Reptiloids and returned to us after their conquest. :D

rofl what a good laugh to wake up to in the morning. I think I'm gonna be in a good mood today :P
 
I am scheduled to debate him at the Seattle Weekly offices tomorrow (Monday Nov 7th) at 5:30pm. A video will be made of the event and (presumably) posted somewhere by Seattle Weekly. (If not, I'll cut my own video)

-Case
 
Case, any heads up on what kind of background you have in this particular field? how much you've studied the wtc collapse etc? would be interesting to know and get an idea of what this guys getting himself into haha.

Good luck dude, looking forward to the video. Oh, and remember, no fancy talk..

"he does not understand. Explain; as you would a child"
 
His money is safe. There's no way to explain what happened using only a thirteen year olds understanding. That is what he wants.

I can do it:

<queue 13 year old voice>
"Ya see, what happened is this fire stuff got some of the beams INSIDE the buliding REALLY REALLY HOT! And when these beams get hot from fires and stuff, like, they lose some of that int-eg-ri-ty, er their strength ya know? So this beam like gives way and it starts these other beams giving way. Now remember this is INSIDE the building, not the outter stuff we see on like videos and stuff. So once that inside stuff has all fallen down then there's nothing to hold up the walls and the rest of the building comes down REALLY REALLY FAST!"
</13 year old voice>
 
I am scheduled to debate him at the Seattle Weekly offices tomorrow (Monday Nov 7th) at 5:30pm. A video will be made of the event and (presumably) posted somewhere by Seattle Weekly. (If not, I'll cut my own video)

-Case

Good luck, and welcome to the forum!
 
I am scheduled to debate him at the Seattle Weekly offices tomorrow (Monday Nov 7th) at 5:30pm. A video will be made of the event and (presumably) posted somewhere by Seattle Weekly. (If not, I'll cut my own video)

-Case

Waste of time. The way it reads to me he is sole arbiter of the event and holds the money. He more or less can just say "Nuh uh!" and that's it
 
any results/video available yet? I'm really looking forward to this haha
 

Back
Top Bottom