Any Update on Silverstein's Lawsuit?

Interesting.

I'd expect RedIbis to know all about it.

# oysteinbookmark
 
And how many times have pople asked you for evidence to justify that defamation? Easily 100.

And the number of times that you have done so? Zero.

Maybe you think Silverstein is on the hook for the rebuilding of 1WTC.
 
Maybe you think Silverstein is on the hook for the rebuilding of 1WTC.

Holy non sequitor BATMAN!!!

Red, I asked you for evidence of your defamatory claim that Silvrstein made out like a bandit.

Don't dodge. Don't waste my time. Don't change the subject.

I want EVIDENCE to support your claim that Silverstein made out like a bandit.

If you can't back it up, just say so.
 
wow. this sounds like the exact comment I engaging with a truther on another forum...same thing. he claims Silverstein made out like a bandit, but when you add the numbers, Silverstein, at most, would only have 1.3 billion to use as he needs (more than likely, to put toward the WTC complex anyway) ... that is if he gets his $12.3 Billion he's asking for.

Forget that he still owes $400 million on WTC 7. Forget that he is still losing rent.
 
wow. this sounds like the exact comment I engaging with a truther on another forum...same thing. he claims Silverstein made out like a bandit, but when you add the numbers, Silverstein, at most, would only have 1.3 billion to use as he needs (more than likely, to put toward the WTC complex anyway) .

Do some research pal.
 
Respond to the question pal.

Seriously, grow up and answer the question: where is your evidence for your claim that Silverstein made out like a bandit?

Do you think Arus is right?
 
I can't find any update to this lawsuit that Silverstein is part of:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/nyregion/27rebuild.html

He's suing for $12.3 Billion.

None that I can see. google searches aren't returning any relevant results for me.

Do you think Arus is right?
Unless you can provide serious evidence this "silverstein made out like a bandit" debacle can be safely tucked away and considered null. There is no case when your only evidence is casting doubt on unrelated issues.
 
Last edited:
Would you just answer the (expletive deleted) question!!??!!

man up for crying out loud.

You don't know Red very well do you?

He is one of the leading "no claimers." Other than that Larry S, made out like a bandit... but he never provides evidence...
 
None that I can see. google searches aren't returning any relevant results for me.


Unless you can provide serious evidence this "silverstein made out like a bandit" debacle can be safely tucked away and considered null. There is no case when your only evidence is casting doubt on unrelated issues.

Well, what you see here too often is this idea that Silverstein will have to use the insurance proceeds to rebuild the WTC. It's simply not true.
 

Back
Top Bottom