Funny thing is - remember Jareth, the collie whose face fell off while CD was "treating" him homoeopathically? Well, when he was finally taken into the RVC, one of the first things the dermatologists suggested for why the poor dog wasn't responding to "treatment" was that he might have MRSA.
Huh?
Anybody ever yet reported an MRSA isolate in a veterinary hospital? No.
Anybody at that time reported an isolate of MRSA from a human loose in the community? I don't think so, or at least damn few.
Any special reason why this dog, who had had very little antibiotic treatment over the years, and who was living in the community with no known contact to a human case or anything, should have MRSA? No. About as likely as him having cholera I should think.
Staph aureus is a human organism. The equivalent skin organisms in dogs are Staph epidermidis (commensal and occasional opportunist) and Staph intermedius (pathogen). If we isolate Staph aureus from a dog, we can be pretty sure it got it from a human. (Probably the surgeon....) MRSA is completely unknown in veterinary medicine, even now.
Never mind, as soon as a case which isn't responding to treatment comes in, the first thing a couple of senior veterinary dermatologists theorise is that he has MRSA. Even though he's a dog, has been nowhere near a human hospital, and hasn't had much antibiotic treatment. The non-response to "treatment" couldn't possibly be anything to do with the fact that the "treatment" consisted of magic sugar pills, could it?
Sheesh, sometimes you have to wonder about your colleagues.
Normal service will now be resumed in this thread.
Rolfe.