Emre_1974tr
Graduate Poster
My Turkish article translated with machine:
https://free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9611966.0
Peace
https://free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9611966.0
Peace
My Turkish article translated with machine:
https://free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9611966.0
Peace
My Turkish article translated with machine:
https://free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9611966.0
Peace
You "test" things to get information about them.
Why would an omnipotent being that already knows everything have to test anything?
Where's your silly God?
The problem of evil is really solved by paganism. The gods weren't omnipotent or omniscient, they were mostly just really powerful spoiled children.
The introduction of omnipotence to religion really makes it a lot harder to swallow. Well, unless you think the omnipotent god really is dick or evil. In which case, it makes sense.
Hiding in narrower and narrower gaps.
Funny how apologetics created a whole host of new problems in their effort to make God more and more intangible.
So it's okay to kill someone because they might cause someone to disbelieve. Not will, did, or had, but might.
My Turkish article translated with machine:
https://free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9611966.0
Peace
I was bored so...
"....his world is the realm of testing, of confronting oneself, and it is also the place where some small punishments or rewards begin to be offered. And every adversity or happiness that happens in this world functions both as a test and as a way of giving the person what they deserve. ..."
Three year old girl, raped multiple times and beheaded: https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/s...ape-and-beheading-of-3-year-old-girl-in-india
What lesson was she learning, what testing was she undergoing, how did she deserve to be raped and killed?
So it's okay to kill someone because they might cause someone to disbelieve. Not will, did, or had, but might.