• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Angelina Jolie mastectomy conspiracy theory...

JLord

Critical Thinker
J
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
426
On coast to coast this weekend, Mike Adams, the editor of Natural News spoke about a possible conspiracy involving Angelina Jolie and Myriad Genetics. Adams talked about how Myriad Genetics has patented certain genes and now owns our bodies. To secure profits and ensure that people pay them for access to their own genome, they presumably were able to convince Jolie to do this surgery and to go public about it at a specific time. He has written an article on Natural News that sums up his findings and goes into more detail than what I heard on Coast to Coast:

Link to Natural News article


Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, "heroic choice" that has been portrayed in the mainstream media. Natural News has learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

This is the investigation the mainstream media refuses to touch. Here, I explain the corporate financial ties, investors, mergers, human gene patents, lawsuits, medical fear mongering and the trillions of dollars that are at stake here. If you pull back the curtain on this one, you find far more than an innocent looking woman exercising a "choice." This is about protecting trillions in profits through the deployment of carefully-crafted public relations campaigns designed to manipulate the public opinion of women.

The signs were all there from the beginning of the scheme: Angelina Jolie's highly polished and obviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the carefully-crafted talking points invoking "choice" as a politically-charged keyword, and the obvious coaching of even her husband Brad Pitt who carefully describes the entire experience using words like "stronger" and "pride" and "family."

But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie's seemingly spontaneous announcement magically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week -- a magazine that is usually finalized for publication three weeks before it appears on newsstands. That cover, not surprisingly, uses the same language found in the NYT op-ed piece: "HER BRAVE CHOICE" and "This was the right thing to do." The flowery, pro-choice language is not a coincidence.

What this proves is that Angelina's Jolie's announcement was a well-planned corporate P.R. campaign with carefully-crafted messages designed to influence public opinion. But what could Jolie be seeking to influence?

...how about trillions of dollars in corporate profits?
Click to expand...

The article goes into much more detail and talks about Obamacare, the cancer industry, and corporate ownership of human genes.
 
People Magazine is written three weeks before it's published? I don't think that's true.
 
Just for snicks, I grabbed a People Magazine off the shelf. It's dated May 20, and the cover features the Amazing Escape! of Amanda Berry and Georgina DeJesus. Which was May 8. And the magazine is mailed out a week before the cover date. It's almost like they want current events and photos on the cover of their weekly magazine.

I knew that Natural News was crap from the anti-vaccine thread, but wow. Shame on anyone who gives this guy a platform to spew his nonsense.
 
I don't see the connection.

1. Angelina Jolie has breast removal and reconstruction surgery.

2. ???

3. Supreme Court decision on gene patent.

4. ???

5. Profit!
 
carlitos said:
Shame on anyone who gives this guy a platform to spew his nonsense.
Click to expand...

He is a frequent contributor on Coast to Coast.


I don't see the connection.

1. Angelina Jolie has breast removal and reconstruction surgery.

2. ???

3. Supreme Court decision on gene patent.

4. ???

5. Profit!
Click to expand...

I think the idea is that Jolie announces her surgery and is portrayed as a hero by the media in order to encourage other women to get the genetic testing on the gene that is owned by Myriad corp. So Myriad profits from the increase in people who are paying (or billing Obamacare) the $2,000 to $3,000 that they charge for the test. The Supreme Court decision doesn't really factor into Jolie's decision. It is just something else that has to happen for the plan to work. Maybe Myriad is somehow influencing the Court as well through this grand deception?
 
Grassy Knowlington said:
I want pictures of the original ones as well for the purposes of comparison, but only for sound medical reasons.
Click to expand...

Dude, Google, secure search off. Not the new ones though, but perform a close study of the 'old ones'.
As for the OP, you'd have to be a real boob to believe that.
 
Shrike said:
Dude, Google, secure search off. Not the new ones though, but perform a close study of the 'old ones'.
As for the OP, you'd have to be a real boob to believe that.
Click to expand...

Given the last two replies I now feel like a right tit in posting what was intended to be a lighthearted response to JB (who I see has clearly got away scott-free with his posting).
 
What this proves is that Angelina's Jolie's announcement was a well-planned corporate P.R. campaign with carefully-crafted messages designed to influence public opinion. But what could Jolie be seeking to influence?
Click to expand...

Er, how about the future health and well-being of other women at high risk of breast cancer?




Sorry, was that not dramatic enough?
 
Grassy Knowlington said:
Given the last two replies I now feel like a right tit in posting what was intended to be a lighthearted response to JB (who I see has clearly got away scott-free with his posting).
Click to expand...
You only feel the right one?
 
I think we need to create a petition to change NaturalNews.com to NutbagWooFactory.com.
 
Let me see if I've got this right. Agelina Jolie, who has no shortage of money, due to her movie acting, and would have no problem making more money the same way, was bribed to have fairly important parts of her body removed so Myriad could promote their genetic tests. Surely this surgery had notihng to do with the fact that she had a damn high risk of dying without the surgery, and everything to do with whateve payoff she got.

It sounds kind of stupid when I put it that way, but only because it is.
 
Last edited:
Personally I think the chick wanted new boobs and a tummy tuck after her pregnancy with twins and this was a way of parlaying it into public sympathy. I don't doubt she did it for medical reasons but she's parading it around as if she's a hero. Color me suspicious.
 
Elizabeth I said:
I don't see the connection.

1. Angelina Jolie has breast removal and reconstruction surgery.

2. ???

3. Supreme Court decision on gene patent.

4. ???

5. Profit!
Click to expand...

The problem here is that you're intelligent, sane and reasonable. You'll never see the connection with that approach.
 
truethat said:
Personally I think the chick wanted new boobs and a tummy tuck after her pregnancy with twins and this was a way of parlaying it into public sympathy. I don't doubt she did it for medical reasons but she's parading it around as if she's a hero. Color me suspicious.
Click to expand...
As Angelina Jolie has an 87% chance of developing breast cancer, plus sufficient money to have breast enhancement and a tummy tuck should she want it, why would you be suspicious? One of my good friends is having a double mastectomy this month because she carries the BRCA1 gene; do you feel equally suspicious of her decision or is it just famous women who engender such mistrust?
 
Agatha said:
As Angelina Jolie has an 87% chance of developing breast cancer, plus sufficient money to have breast enhancement and a tummy tuck should she want it, why would you be suspicious? One of my good friends is having a double mastectomy this month because she carries the BRCA1 gene; do you feel equally suspicious of her decision or is it just famous women who engender such mistrust?
Click to expand...


No, it's women who parlay every day acts of things that happen to regular women as some sort of sainted act on a regular basis, that causes me to be suspicious. You know, the kind of person who treats the birth of her baby like a media event and sells the pictures of the baby to the highest bidder.

One of the weirdest things I've ever seen is a mother marketing her baby to the point that the baby had it's own statue at Madam Tussauds. It's grotesque IMO. Marketing trips to foreign countries when it was pretty clear that AJ was only there to maintain her heroin addiction years ago, as helping the poor, it's seriously GMAB.

She's a nice person and I admire her in many ways but color me not surprised that she's marketing her surgeries which were probably a no brainer situation as the same sort of situation an every day woman would face. Not buying it.

What kind of person are you that you would bring your friend into what I said?


Shudders....
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom