• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Aircraft crashes and breaks up

jaydeehess

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
20,849
Location
40 miles north of the border
into tiny pieces.

http://www.rapperport.com/accident.html

At 08:37 GMT (15:37 local time) flight MI 185 took off, climbed to 35,000 feet and assumed a Palembang heading. At 09:05:15, the cockpit voice recorder ceased recording with no abnormal data. The last readable data from the flight data recorder was at 09:11:27. Jakarta Air Traffic Control radar recording showed that MI 185 was still at 35,000 feet at 09:12:09. The next radar return, eight seconds later, indicated that MI 185 was 400 feet below 35,000 feet and a rapid descent followed. The last recorded radar data at 09:12:41 showed the aircraft at 19,500 feet. The empennage (the tail section including stabilizing and flight control surfaces) of the aircraft subsequently broke up in flight and the aircraft crashed into the Musi River delta, about 50 kilometers north-north-east of Palembang at about 09:13. The accident occurred in daylight and in good weather conditions.

The wreckage had penetrated deep into the river bottom complicating recovery efforts. The impact force was so great and the destruction was so extensive that most of the recovered fragments from the river consisted of small highly distorted parts. Portions of the rudder skin and the outboard sections of the horizontal stabilizer were recovered on land, the furthest about four kilometers from the main impact site. About 73% by weight of the wreckage was recovered.

The only large parts of this plane that were recovered were those that broke off pre-impact.

I wonder if Klowntown is aware of this flight.
 
,,, and then there's

Air France flight 8969, bound for Paris from Algiers in June of 1976. It was hijacked on the tarmac in Algiers. The Algierians blocked its path and the hijackers killed three people before the Algierians gave in and allowed it to take off. It had been running the aux. power unit for a full day though and did not have enough fuel to reach Paris so it put down in Marseilles. The French would not allow a re-fueling and eventually stormed the plane successfully. those old enough to recall this will remember the co-pilot jumping out the window of the cockpit.

The hijackers had called for a very specific amount of fuel. They had wanted 27 tonnes but the flight to Paris required no more than 9 tonnes. The significance of 27 tonnes? It is the max that the Airbus 300 could carry. It was already suspected that they intended to blow the plane up over Paris(they did have bombs on board) which was one of the reasons the plane was not allowed to leave Marseilles. The leader of the Algierian Mujahadeen later admitted the plan was to do so, basically to use it to firebomb Paris.

This is a clear example of a suicide hijacking that was thwarted. The main reason it was stopped was that the hijackers did not know enough about the aircraft or flight operations(the lead hijacker had to have it explained how to use the radio). All they had studied about the plane was the amount of fuel they could get maximum. They had boarded the plane as Algeirian police but the Captain was suspicious and the delay alerted the tower that something was up so they blocked the path of the plane. This was a myopic hijacking plan. The planners of 9/11 learned from this apparently.
 
Air France flight 8969, bound for Paris from Algiers in June of 1976. It was hijacked on the tarmac in Algiers. The Algierians blocked its path and the hijackers killed three people before the Algierians gave in and allowed it to take off. It had been running the aux. power unit for a full day though and did not have enough fuel to reach Paris so it put down in Marseilles. The French would not allow a re-fueling and eventually stormed the plane successfully. those old enough to recall this will remember the co-pilot jumping out the window of the cockpit.

The hijackers had called for a very specific amount of fuel. They had wanted 27 tonnes but the flight to Paris required no more than 9 tonnes. The significance of 27 tonnes? It is the max that the Airbus 300 could carry. It was already suspected that they intended to blow the plane up over Paris(they did have bombs on board) which was one of the reasons the plane was not allowed to leave Marseilles. The leader of the Algierian Mujahadeen later admitted the plan was to do so, basically to use it to firebomb Paris.

This is a clear example of a suicide hijacking that was thwarted. The main reason it was stopped was that the hijackers did not know enough about the aircraft or flight operations(the lead hijacker had to have it explained how to use the radio). All they had studied about the plane was the amount of fuel they could get maximum. They had boarded the plane as Algeirian police but the Captain was suspicious and the delay alerted the tower that something was up so they blocked the path of the plane. This was a myopic hijacking plan. The planners of 9/11 learned from this apparently.
C'mon Jaydee.... That was so obviously a false-flag op that was supposed to fail. A false false-flag op. The purpose of which was only to give the impression to the world that Islamic extremism exists.

Step out of your NWO box and use your brain (or YouTube).
 
Speaking of plane crashes i just watched a doco where the remains of a Hurricane that was flown by Group Captain B. Drake was recovered from a field in France. The amazing part was plane parts penetrated some 8-9ft into the underlying solid chalk which was about a metre below the topsoil. The pilot bailed out at about 8,000ft.

http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/811/vlcsnap246324vz9.jpg
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/8127/vlcsnap246912ll4.jpg
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/747/vlcsnap244537ej3.jpg
 
Aha, see - it's the French that are in on it again!! Just like the so-called "documentary". :D
 
Aha, see - it's the French that are in on it again!! Just like the so-called "documentary". :D

Typical CT in two ways; first calling into question the veracity of the account by claiming false data produced by a group in some way affiliated to another which they claim was producing false data with no evidence that either has done so, and second, ignoring the Silk Air crash because it actually does resemble the crash of flight 93.

Don't worry Architect, I am not counting you among that number:D
 
Valujet 592's crash is another case of big hole, no obvious airplane.

-z
 
Valujet 592's crash is another case of big hole, no obvious airplane.

-z

Not only that, but the way in which the black boxes were discovered would make the Killclowns head explode.

The two boxes sat literally an inch apart in the airplane, yet somehow the CVR was only recovered some 13 days after the FDR was found. One was in a foot of water and the other had to be scooped out with a backhoe. Talk about conspiracy...
 

Back
Top Bottom