valis
Muse
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2004
- Messages
- 647
Just two things about the e-mail Randi quoted in the newsletter.
1.Is it really fair to call Wendi Freisens' (sp?) hypnosis tapes 'useless'? I am not being rhetorical I am really curious. These are not subliminal nonsense but just hypnosis sessions. Can hypnosis really not do any good in helping modify behavior? I also think it is a stretch to say that Ms. Friesen claimed to "cure" alcoholism. I will admit that some of her claims, like breast enlargment are laughable. But I always thought behavior modification was a legitimate use of hypnosis.
B.Why is it suprising that the left would tout Chopra? Wasn't it Al Gore that cozied up to Geller and tried to use his "powers"? I have always wondered why it is that Gore gets credit for being some informed science literate kind of guy when there appears to be no evidence to back that up. Meanwhile Bush is an bumpkin. I think that attitude says more about the prejudices of the people who hold it than it does about pols. on the left or right.
1.Is it really fair to call Wendi Freisens' (sp?) hypnosis tapes 'useless'? I am not being rhetorical I am really curious. These are not subliminal nonsense but just hypnosis sessions. Can hypnosis really not do any good in helping modify behavior? I also think it is a stretch to say that Ms. Friesen claimed to "cure" alcoholism. I will admit that some of her claims, like breast enlargment are laughable. But I always thought behavior modification was a legitimate use of hypnosis.
B.Why is it suprising that the left would tout Chopra? Wasn't it Al Gore that cozied up to Geller and tried to use his "powers"? I have always wondered why it is that Gore gets credit for being some informed science literate kind of guy when there appears to be no evidence to back that up. Meanwhile Bush is an bumpkin. I think that attitude says more about the prejudices of the people who hold it than it does about pols. on the left or right.