G-K-4
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 362
I have an idea for a short story about a group of do-gooders who are tarred with the charge of conspiracism. Not simple criminal conspiracy, though. I'm talking about an accusation of grand, historical manipulation, that "these people are the Illuminati/Freemasons/whatever with a new name".
That might be good enough as it is to build a story. But I thought of a twist. What if this is the kind of reputation a new organization wanted to promote (in secret, of course)? Does that make any sense?
It might make a nice counterintuitive twist to the tale, but I'm not sure that I can find a good motive. So I ask you all for an evaluation of the idea. Why might some new and genuinely sociable* organization want to leave hints that it is part of a secret elite? Wouldn't that be dangerous? Wouldn't that sow mistrust and defeat their efforts?
Thanks in advance for any comments.
* I say this to distinguish them from such self-serving hoaxers as Pierre Plantard.
That might be good enough as it is to build a story. But I thought of a twist. What if this is the kind of reputation a new organization wanted to promote (in secret, of course)? Does that make any sense?
It might make a nice counterintuitive twist to the tale, but I'm not sure that I can find a good motive. So I ask you all for an evaluation of the idea. Why might some new and genuinely sociable* organization want to leave hints that it is part of a secret elite? Wouldn't that be dangerous? Wouldn't that sow mistrust and defeat their efforts?
Thanks in advance for any comments.
* I say this to distinguish them from such self-serving hoaxers as Pierre Plantard.