• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AA in on the conspiracy

The Automobile Association was in on it?

Alcoholics Anonymous was in on it?

Anti-aircraft Artillery was in on it?
 
i would stop giving those less than subhuman creatures any more attention. let them wallow in the cult followers. nothing we say or post will make them change their minds. The REAL world already rejects their claims, They are only pandering to those that they hope to squeeze as much money as they can out of.

Fools will be fools. Rob, CIT and those that support their pet theories, are a gaggle of fools.
 
AMTMAN said:
At least according to Aldo of CIT.

< http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/97376/1/#new >

Actually he tries to go both ways by saying it might be a bit of both. Also notice in true Aldo form how he resorts to name calling.
Click to expand...


In the bizarro world of conspiracy theorists anyone who disagrees with them is either in on it or clueless.

It's telling that after all these years, and with all their alleged evidence and eyewitnesses, their principal activity seems to be bickering on internet forums and flogging DVDs.

Like Arus808, I think it is a waste of time trying to engage with them. I think it is more helpful to lurkers to reiterate, in lay terms if possible, how the FDR works, what it showed about AA77's flight, and what its limitations are. I notice one of the posters on that thread acknowledges not understanding the Beachnut/Tony Soprano discussion, but was swayed by the CIT video.
 
Magenta said:
I notice one of the posters on that thread acknowledges not understanding the Beachnut/Tony Soprano discussion, but was swayed by the CIT video.
Click to expand...

I'm going to guess that they had already made up their mind before they saw any CIT video.
 
I've always wondered what CIT's theory was regarding how the FDR was faked. Did they take it from AA77 when it supposedly landed later on, then just cut off all data beyond a certain point? Wouldn't they be smart enough to at least check it was plausible? After all they just managed to full well over a hundred people in the local area!
 
e^n said:
I've always wondered what CIT's theory was regarding how the FDR was faked. Did they take it from AA77 when it supposedly landed later on, then just cut off all data beyond a certain point? Wouldn't they be smart enough to at least check it was plausible? After all they just managed to full well over a hundred people in the local area!
Click to expand...
The nWo used one of their big computers that runs on magic to entirely fake the data onto an actual FDR, then planted it at the "crash" site. However, the last bits of data were off slightly, due to a quantum fluctuation and possibly a slight calculation error.
And that will be they're undoing! Tr00th will out!
 
I had a frustrating exchange with Aldo. I just wanted to know what he thinks happened. After this exchange he called me a traitor, and an enemy of USA and your constitution. Nice going. I won't post to him anymore, but this is what he thinks happened:

How did they fake the light poles?
They removed 5 light poles well in advance. Placed 4-5 of the broken pre-fabbed ones down on 9/10-11 night AM hours. Pole 1 moved into position when 3 men rolled up on Lloyd and his cab. Cab was pre-damaged. Windshield was busted from inside and pulled in as plane went over.

DNA?
Fake reports? Faked DNA( some passengers could have been ops and gave DNA samples)? Switched DNA? Planted DNA? Any number of ideas. How would they have faked the ID'ing of bodies that would have faked deaths in Operation Northwoods? Clearly they felt confident that they had the means, if they had the will.

Impact hole?
Um explosives. How does a plane's wing and engine blow a column bases UP and OUT?

Debris?
Planted and/or blown out onto lawn from storage trailers parked RIGHT IN FRONT of the alleged impact holes.

The eyewitness testimonies contradicting your findings?
There are no eyewitness testimonies contradicting our findings, since there are no witnesses willing to come forward and on location point to the south side of the Citgo as the flight path of the plane.

Operatives paid to or blackmailed into lying about seeing an impact or simply innocent citizens who saw a plane but did not see an impact or who saw a plane and an explosion and saw is how they accomplished selling the impact.

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/97279/1/
 
Last edited:
Those people are stupid insane scumbags

They have an anonymous source to prove some of their claims. The claims are debunked by an anonymous source. They cry and stamp their feet about JREF using anonymous sources. Even if AMTMAN gives them his details they would still hide their own anonymous source?? Hypocrites much?

They know nothing about aircraft in the slightest and in agreeing there were no airphones, are saying all the calls were faked.

If this lot were some of the saner truthers then I would be happy to give details to them if I was AMTMAN, but this lot are at the extreme insane end and are untrustworthy. They accuse Lloyd England of being a perp just imagine what would happen to AMTMAN if he showed them to be wrong.

AMTMAN could even be a fake plant but what they fail to see is that this does not matter in the slightest. All they have to do is ask their own source about the TR and the ECO that AMTMAN has explained to them. This info will debunk him. All they have to do is ask any person from the aircraft industry who has used manuals to explain what TR means on an aircraft maintenance documents?

They will not do it though and we know why.
 
Last edited:
Aldo did exactly what I thought he would do. Attack, call me names and try and deflect from the issue.
 
Again, we should stop giving these subhuman cowards any more attention than they deserve. Just post an article stating why they are wrong, and move on. No one except in their little circle of jaq-offers are listening to them. THE REAL WORLD doesn't care about what they say or claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom