• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A White Nationalist Primer (Stormfront)

Luke T.

Unregistered
Joined
May 2, 2003
Messages
14,716
This is a guide for anyone who would like to join me on stormfront.org.

First of all, I don't recommend you directly go to stormfront.org from here. They use vBulletin, just like JREF, and the admins are able to tell the last web site that you came from. If you have posted a lot of personal information about yourself on here, you might not want them to know you came from here, if you follow my drift.

I usually jump there from a neutral site like Google.

This may be paranoia on my part, as I have found the White Nationalists not to be a bunch of loons, as some might think, but you never know about the lone loon or two who might be lurking about.

Also, I don’t know how the rest of JREF would handle the sudden appearance of White Nationalists on the JREF forum. I wouldn’t want to be responsible for that. :D

Okay. Some pointers.

First of all, if you are anti-White Nationalism, you will be known to them as an "anti," and must restrict your posts to the "Opposing Views" section of the forum. You may surf the entire site, but do not post to a topic outside of the Opposing Views section. If you see something in a topic outside of that area that you want to discuss, you can start your own topic about it in Opposing Views.

Second, it is best if you throw out any preconceived notions you may have about White Nationalism. Nazis, Hitler, gas ovens, skinheads, etc. No two WNs are the same. Some are exactly as one would imagine, some are not.

Ask questions. Learn.

Never, ever, laugh at White Nationalism or WNs. I came within a hair's breadth of being banned just for making a joke that anyone who wouldn't do Halle Barry had to be one sick person. :D

That went over very badly. And for a while after that, I wasn’t allowed any sense of humor at all. I made a sarcastic comment about something one day after the Halle Barry joke and was told that was two strikes against me.

Once you have earned a little respect from them, you may exchange humorous comments as long as it is not at the expense of them or their philosophy.

Do not allow yourself to get emotional. That will also get you banned.

It is very easy to get banned. WNs are real big on free speech, except when it comes to antis.

Your skeptical skills will be tested like they never have been before. You must be logical, concise, and able to back up your claims. And they have heard it all before, so be ready for it.

The smartest of the WNs tend to congregate in the Opposing Views section. I cannot stress enough that you will be debating some of their brightest people. The occasional yahoo drops in, but they rarely stick around. And the occasional idiot drops in who is against Nazis and says something stupid like “You guys suck,” or “I’m ashamed to be white because of you guys,” but they don’t hang around long either.

The really do appreciate a well thought out argument. You will earn their respect if you give them a good fight. Just make sure you stay rational and calm at all times, even though some WNs get very ugly and toss ad homs at will. Don't be baited into replying in kind as the moderators will swoop down and eject you immediately. The moderators read every anti post.

At first, all new posters are put on a time delay. This can be extremely frustrating. The moderators say this is to prevent emotional or stupid tirades from the occasional trolls. Once you have established yourself as a stable individual, you may petition the moderators via PM to remove the time delay. This usually takes an anti up to 50 posts on their forum before they feel you are trustworthy. Even after they remove the time delay, they watch you like hawks.

Okay. So what is the philosophy of White Nationalism all about?

Keep in mind that I said no two WNs think the same way. I will outline very broadly what their philosophy is, and try to include the variations of each idea within the philosophy. If there is one thing a WN hates, it is for an anti to make an assumption of what they believe. This can seem pretty ironic considering how often they will guess not only what you think, but your ethnicity, based on little or no clues from you whatsoever.

Avoid the use of phrases that attempt to lump a single WN in with all WNs. They hate that. If you are talking to a WN and say "all you guys think is...." then he will slam you for it. He will demand you show him where he said that.

Very basically, WNs believe that the races would all be happier if they lived apart. Some believe it is inevitable that this will happen. Just about every WN denies that this should occur by force, or that if WNs ever take over a nation, that they will commence some kind of genocide. Although there are some who have boldly proclaimed to me that genocide would be an option, most WNs vehemently deny this.

Should a White Nation come to pass, WNs feel that many non-whites would feel compelled to leave such a place on their own and would move to a country where they could find their own kind. Those non-whites who did not move of their own volition would be forced to emigrate. Some WNs say that these people would be financially compensated for the trouble. And there are some WNs who feel that those non-whites who remained would be sterilized.

I have found that most of the WNs I talk with strongly deny that they are racists. And they especially deny that they hate anyone. If you accuse a WN of hating non-whites, you better be prepared to show exactly where he used hateful language. I have had a lot of conversations just trying to figure out what the WN definition of "hate" and "racism" are. It's a topsy-turvy world.

WNs like to talk about the lower IQs of blacks. And the high crime rate amongst blacks. And the high proportion of blacks in our prisons. And so on and so on. But you will be hard pressed to get a WN to say they think blacks are "inferior," because that would imply the WN is a "supremacist," and they don't like that label. Although one or two have come right out and admitted to being supremacists.

Some WNs think that once all the races live separately, that the black nations will most likely self-destruct. I have more than once been asked to provide the name of any nation that is not white or asian that is successful.

WNs don't begrudge the existence of the state of Israel, which was initially very surprising to me, considering how much they slander Jews on Stormfront. But to WNs, Israel is proof that we will all end up separate. What they do begrudge Israel is its influence on the U.S.'s policies.

Even though an anti may be a political conservative, WNs have another catch-all for them. "Cultural Marxism." I was given a primer from a female WN on cultural Marxism. If you want one yourself, go to
http://www.geocities.com/roundtable_research_editions/frankfurt_resed.html

Or just look up the "Frankfurt School" on google. Basically, the Jews control our political process, and are behind the "politically correct" movement, and are seeking to diminish white influence around the world.

This same female WN told me she believed only white male property owners should have the right to vote in America! :eek:

There is a camp in the WN community that has a huge resentment about the Reconstruction period following the Civil War. They believe that is when the Constitution was irrevocably damaged, and the “multiculturalists” began their takeover of our country. America was on the path away from its glorious past as a White Nation. I am being extremely general about this.

WNs also believe our immigration policy is seriously whacked. They believe we should have stuck to the Naturalization Act of our forefathers, which was written in the 18th century. It is their belief that our immigration program has allowed so many non-whites in, that it is now impossible to stem the flow. No politician would dare anger the large portion of the immigrant population by suggesting we curb immigration now. And so the disappearance of whites in America is virtually assured. And this was once a proud white nation. And these large numbers of immigrants are a net negative on our economy. Especially in the border states. So we are doomed.

Antis are called all kinds of other names. Multicults. Cultural Marxists. Neo-cons. And that is just the nice stuff.

There are a lot of symbolic numbers and phrases you may see. Most are self explanatory, or you will pick them up as you go along. Other symbology is included in usernames or signature lines. For example, “88.” This comes from the fact that the letter H is the eighth letter of the alphabet and represents “HH,” or “Heil Hitler.” You see 88 a lot on Stormfront. You may also see the expression “14 Words.” This comes from David Lane, a member of The Order, and means, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children,” which is 14 words long.

You will see a few swastikas and other nazi symbols around Stormfront. Be careful not to assume all WNs idolize Hitler. Opinions on Hitler come in all flavors. Some do idolize him. Some don’t like him at all. Many think he was given a bad shake in the history books. Discussions on the Holocaust are common, and WNs either believe it didn’t happen at all (very rare to find a WN who believes this, though), or believe it was overplayed/exaggerated by the Jews. Some believe the concentration camps were no different than the U.S. concentration camps of Japanese, and that the Jews were well treated, and rightly imprisoned as threats to Germany’s goals. Saboteurs, whatever. And the only reason they were malnourished is because by the end of the war, all of Germany was malnourished and why give what little food was available to enemies of the state?

As for the death camps (DO NOT confuse the two), “where is the evidence?” Have fun with that. I highly recommend you read any past topics on Stormfront about the Holocaust before stepping into that mess.

By and large, though, everything keeps coming back to race. There is one camp in the WN community that believe a “racial holy war” is inevitable. Good luck finding out what that means. Not all of them believe it actually means armed conflict. There is one camp that believes that the assumption of power by “multiculturalists,” or non-whites, should actually be encouraged so that whites will see how much they make a mess of things and come to their senses and return the U.S. to its proper place. Yeah.

I haven’t found any great fans of the Constitution. Many are well-versed in U.S. history, though. But their interpretations vary widely.

Expect to make some of the longest posts of your life. It has taken me over an hour to answer some of their posts. I feel they deserve the best I can give them. Since I am in a very tiny minority over there, I have to fight the good fight. And any dodge to their questions or claims is hailed as a victory on their part.
I have found that when I treat them with respect, the best of the best tend to flock to the topics I am engaged in. And there is mutual respect and some fascinating conversation. It is well worth the trip and the effort.

Hope I see some of you over there. Frankly, I am exhausted from dealing with these guys by myself. Not that there aren’t any other antis over there, it is just that there are so few that we tend to be divided and conquered. Each of us is wrapped up in our own separate topics. It gets tiring. And I don’t necessarily agree with the political viewpoints of some of the other antis there. Some of them are Marxists, and I disagree with them probably more than I disagree with WNs. :D
 
Ian Osborne said:
Luke, what nick do you use there? I'd like to see some of your battles...

T. Ekul :D

I started a topic called "Ask T. Ekul" that is a good place to start. I also started a topic called "What I Understand and What I Don't Understand" that asked WNs to explain their beliefs to me.

"Ask T. Ekul" is about to be bumped back to the top of the Opposing Views section since I am still working on responses to posts people made to me. It has been very hard for me to keep up with answering everyone. But that should give you a good idea of what kind of fight I've been in.
 
I don't disagree that the mixture of cultures in America is one of our strongest, yet sometimes weakest and most experimental aspects of our nation. It does seem to be natural for people of a like mind and kind to live amongst themselves.

I have enough walls to pound my head against without joining that site, but thanks for the info. It is good to know what "the enemy" are thinking sometimes, but in this case I personally don't care. The mixing of races is a challenge that benefits people in many ways. It is difficult and it may not work in the end, but accepting the status quo (in their minds) that races can't live together is a cop out.


From their forum: Discussion of a guy angry at his girlfriend for giving her phone number to an "African Immigrant".
I would never, NEVER give my # to ANY nonwhite!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I can't even stand looking at them so why would I write down my number and give it to him..... If that happened to me I would tell him where to go.
..........
She won't show me where he lives, or do anything else to 'get him in trouble'
Gee maybe she's trying to get rid of you because you're a racist? After reading a few more threads...ya they may say they aren't racists. Don't most bigots claim that as they talk about "those people"?

They're politically correct racists :D
 
I forgot to mention that discussion of religion is strictly verboten on Stormfront. Although that probably scores points with some of you. :D

You can talk about Jews all the live long day. I think they are viewed more as a "race" than a "religion" on Stormfront.

schplurg, I hope you find the time to post on Stormfront someday. I know what you mean about being stretched pretty thin already. Stormfront completely dominates my online time now, at the sacrifice of my time here at JREF and some of my other favorite web sites. But it is a refreshing change of pace from debunking UFOs and psychics.
 
I refuse to post on a site that has no Planet X content. :D
Seriously, I just don't have the time to get involved w/ those inbred creeps. I think they'll die off on their own accord eventually anyway.
Keep fighting the good fight Luke!
 
WildCat said:
I refuse to post on a site that has no Planet X content. :D
Seriously, I just don't have the time to get involved w/ those inbred creeps. I think they'll die off on their own accord eventually anyway.
Keep fighting the good fight Luke!

I made a reference to Planet X, and one of the senior moderators immediately retorted with a sarcastic Nibiru reference!

Like I said, they ain't dummies.
 
Luke, I appreciate your work over there on stormfront, it's very courageous of you and I hope you can continue to maintain your sanity for as long as you have now. I visited there, following your instructions of course and took a look at your "Ask T. Ekul" thread. I admit that I was a bit frightened, they're so sure of themselves, it seems impossible to wrench them from their beliefs. However, you have mentioned that you're mainly fighting for the fence-sitters, and I hope and am sure you've brought them around.

I wish I could help you, but I'm afraid I would not have any credentials from their criteria, namely, that I'm a leftist, and I am very young. One can imagine how quickly they'd brush me off like parasite, but you have my well wishes at the least.

I know that you're an intelligent fellow, and that you've debated with these people frequently so that you may have come across everything regarding these people. However, I have some questions which you could answer, or not if you prefer.

Firstly, where in the Constitution do they draw their justification for a "white nation"? I actually know that it's highly probable they've already answered similar questions, but what do they draw from? Is it the "three-fifths compromise"? Do they focus on the forefathers such as Thomas Jefferson whom owned slaves? How can they be conservative, which in the early years of our nation I believe would be labeled "constructionist", and yet go beyond the words of the Constitution to justify these sentiments?

If and when America becomes a "white nation", do they believe crime will nose-dive? Do they think every white will suddenly transform into a upstanding citizen and follow their ideology. To put it in their context "who is going to drive all the taxis when the non-whites are gone?" (I thought of this while playing GTA Vice City:D) How can they even expect every white to compromise with them? I myself would blame the crime that is so commonly cited by them is due to urbanization which is a process that overwhelms infrastructure, in addition to long-lived discrimination, which has been focused on even white ethnic groups like the Irish, back in the 1800's. Although the circumstances have undoubtedly changed, with less mass immigrations. What is their opinion of the whites in Appalachia or anywhere else in America that are poor or not working? Are they all resultant of Affirmative Action? [sarcasm]Whatever happened to that fantastic intellect the IQ tests report showing favour to whites[/sarcasm].

Why do they support war for any cause other than protection? I know this would be hard for you to answer being a conservative and all, but play along.;) Shouldn't we leave all other nations alone, except perhaps white ones, in order to preserve our civilization? I can recognize the sentiment of preemptive strikes, but shouldn't we, in their context, just let the rest of the non-white world fall over and die? In spite of their downplaying the "neo-cons" they still seem to follow them, I would expect them to keep their distance, but then again you did admonish generalizations about them.

That's all I have to ask, excuse my long-winded post. I hope that you can aggregate more followers over time, and I just may attempt debating over there, but considering how infrequently I do so here, it'll hard be to muster the courage.
 
Luke, you spent all this time there and all you could gleen was that they are sissies who dance around racial superiority and hatred like lawyers.

I said it once and I shall say it again, big waste of time.
 
Mmm, obviously a whole site full of essentially trolls, or at least troll behaviour. Should appeal to an old troll-basher like meself. Would more or less leave me without time for JREF, but you can surely survive that, heheh. I won't have time during hte next several weeks, though. Will also need to prepare a special e-mail address for registering.

--- and think of a new handle ;) ... Mmm, I could send Trinity for starters, that place should really turn her on :p

Hans
 
Khalid01 said:
Luke, I appreciate your work over there on stormfront, it's very courageous of you and I hope you can continue to maintain your sanity for as long as you have now. I visited there, following your instructions of course and took a look at your "Ask T. Ekul" thread. I admit that I was a bit frightened, they're so sure of themselves, it seems impossible to wrench them from their beliefs. However, you have mentioned that you're mainly fighting for the fence-sitters, and I hope and am sure you've brought them around.

I have received some interesting PMs over there.

I wish I could help you, but I'm afraid I would not have any credentials from their criteria, namely, that I'm a leftist, and I am very young. One can imagine how quickly they'd brush me off like parasite, but you have my well wishes at the least.

You wouldn't be the only leftist, and there are certainly a large number of young people there. They may even make up the majority.


I know that you're an intelligent fellow, and that you've debated with these people frequently so that you may have come across everything regarding these people. However, I have some questions which you could answer, or not if you prefer.

I can certainly answer any questions you have.

Firstly, where in the Constitution do they draw their justification for a "white nation"? I actually know that it's highly probable they've already answered similar questions, but what do they draw from? Is it the "three-fifths compromise"? Do they focus on the forefathers such as Thomas Jefferson whom owned slaves? How can they be conservative, which in the early years of our nation I believe would be labeled "constructionist", and yet go beyond the words of the Constitution to justify these sentiments?

Again, there is no all-encompassing WN philosophy, but the basic idea is that America was mostly comprised of white people at the beginning. Some WNs feel slavery was a mistake, but only in that it introduced non-whites into our country. And was a black mark on our human rights scorecard.

I am only vaguely beginning to understand where they feel things went wrong after that. It seems to be tied to the Reconstruction period after the Civil War, when the Constitution was amended at gunpoint. This opened the door for "multiculturalism," in their opinion. Free blacks, equal opportunity, Affirmative Action, and so on. They feel the Constitution was no longer a constitution after Reconstruction, and that the central government then assumed a role it was not supposed to assume. States rights were forever gone.

If and when America becomes a "white nation", do they believe crime will nose-dive?

Yes, they do. Unequivocably. But not every WN feels that America will ever be a White Nation again.

Do they think every white will suddenly transform into a upstanding citizen and follow their ideology. To put it in their context "who is going to drive all the taxis when the non-whites are gone?" (I thought of this while playing GTA Vice City:D) How can they even expect every white to compromise with them?

They don't expect every white to fall in line with their thinking. But they think most whites will come around to their point of view when things get bad enough. That is why one camp of WNs feels that as many non-whites should be handed the reins of power in America as possible, so that whites will begin to see what a mess they make of things and create an upswell of white backlash.

Those whites who do not fall into the WN way of thinking will be invited to leave the White Nation and live amongst the "muds." Or they will be forcibly emigrated along with the non-whites.

Some WNs are confident that within most white men, there is a White Nationalist dying to break out.

Apparently some non-whites believe the same thing. :D

I myself would blame the crime that is so commonly cited by them is due to urbanization which is a process that overwhelms infrastructure, in addition to long-lived discrimination, which has been focused on even white ethnic groups like the Irish, back in the 1800's. Although the circumstances have undoubtedly changed, with less mass immigrations. What is their opinion of the whites in Appalachia or anywhere else in America that are poor or not working? Are they all resultant of Affirmative Action? [sarcasm]Whatever happened to that fantastic intellect the IQ tests report showing favour to whites[/sarcasm].

They have the official government statistics to back up their claim that poor white Appalachians have a lower crime rate than poor black populations. Take a look for yourself. West Virginia. Many a topic has discussed U.S. Census statistics which show the higher the black population in a state, the higher the crime rate. The ten states that have the highest black percentage have the highest crime rates. The ten states that have the lowest black percentage have the lowest crime rates.

Think about how you would argue against that. Not so easy, eh?

Why do they support war for any cause other than protection? I know this would be hard for you to answer being a conservative and all, but play along.;) Shouldn't we leave all other nations alone, except perhaps white ones, in order to preserve our civilization? I can recognize the sentiment of preemptive strikes, but shouldn't we, in their context, just let the rest of the non-white world fall over and die? In spite of their downplaying the "neo-cons" they still seem to follow them, I would expect them to keep their distance, but then again you did admonish generalizations about them.

Actually, there seems to be an isolationist attitude among the WNs. They were about as divided over the war in Iraq as we were on this forum. As for letting non-white nations fall over and die, that is pretty much their attitude. But they feel that we give too much aid to Israel to let natural selection take place. And they feel Israel has far too much influence in our politics.

That's all I have to ask, excuse my long-winded post. I hope that you can aggregate more followers over time, and I just may attempt debating over there, but considering how infrequently I do so here, it'll hard be to muster the courage.

I hope I do see you over there. Ponder some of the things I discussed in this topic and see what kind of thoughts you come up with. I think you would do well.
 
Nice work, Luke. I went for a look and it is clear to me that you have garnered some respect but also that you are severly moderating yourself in order to kowtow to the local rules.

I'd join you, but:

a) If their main goal is the seperation of races into seperate countries, then that isn't really a goal which can be argued against scientifically. The reasons for wanting this goal and the methods for achieving it certainly can be questioned, but the goal itself seems like a political opinion.
2) I don't like to be seriously "straitjacketed" in regard to my posts.
3) They are already a fringe minority and don't have a hope in hell of achieving any of their goals.
 
DanishDynamite said:
Nice work, Luke. I went for a look and it is clear to me that you have garnered some respect but also that you are severly moderating yourself in order to kowtow to the local rules.

I'd join you, but:

a) If their main goal is the seperation of races into seperate countries, then that isn't really a goal which can be argued against scientifically. The reasons for wanting this goal and the methods for achieving it certainly can be questioned, but the goal itself seems like a political opinion.
2) I don't like to be seriously "straitjacketed" in regard to my posts.
3) They are already a fringe minority and don't have a hope in hell of achieving any of their goals.

I don't like being "straitjacketed" either, DD, but I am learning to adapt.

As for the rest, you make good points, but my big picture goal is to deflate some of their arguments which engender hatred and mistrust between human beings.

And I am also there just to learn about White Nationalism. It is a fascinating subject. And why not apply critical thinking to politics like we do the paranormal elsewhere on the net?

While a White Nation may not be achievable, the spread of prejudice certainly is. We can at least do a little something about that.
 
Luke T. said:


I don't like being "straitjacketed" either, DD, but I am learning to adapt.

As for the rest, you make good points, but my big picture goal is to deflate some of their arguments which engender hatred and mistrust between human beings.

And I am also there just to learn about White Nationalism. It is a fascinating subject. And why not apply critical thinking to politics like we do the paranormal elsewhere on the net?

While a White Nation may not be achievable, the spread of prejudice certainly is. We can at least do a little something about that.
I understand your motives and I think they are admirable. Kudos, my friend. Perhaps, if things are slow here, I will slide into the straijacket and post there.

Anyway, the very best of luck.
 
Good luck over there Luke. I'm afraid I won't be joining you as I am a person who can get overtaken by my emotions too easily. I don't think I would last a day before getting banned.

Stig
 
Good luck to you Luke, I would highly recommend you keep your contact with these people at a distance. My run it with folks of this ilk left me with a .38 slug in the back. And I never want to have any contact with them again.
 
Stig said:
Good luck over there Luke. I'm afraid I won't be joining you as I am a person who can get overtaken by my emotions too easily. I don't think I would last a day before getting banned.

Stig

I know what you mean. It took me a while to get my feelings in check. But I have found that the longer I stay, and the more I learn, the easier it is. The more rational people tend to congregate together from the anti and WN camps.
 

Back
Top Bottom