• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A rapidly evolving work place

coberst

Critical Thinker
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
415
How the Cow Ate the Cabbage ready post

I am a retired engineer and I shall give to you what my understanding of the education of an engineer is all about; I do this because I think that almost all professional education in the US and elsewhere are very similar. I think that many young people have an uninformed view of these matters and I think that such erroneous views are detrimental to understanding the world we live in.

A young person receiving an education in engineering is taught the algorithms, patterns, and paradigms of their chosen profession. Essentially the student is taught the manual of the profession; just as a mechanic is taught the very same thing regarding the repair of automobiles. We were given the knowledge necessary to quickly become a productive worker for our employer.

The education of the professional is a rote learning of specific facts and how to utilize the tools of the trade as the patterns of the specific job dictate. The manual of the profession is temporally sufficient for the graduating student but the temporality is short lived. The work place is very dynamic and the graduate can function in the specific work place only for a short time before the reality of change forces the static individual into obsolescence because the manual of the profession is functionally diminishing as it is being taught.

I think that the educational institutions prepare graduates that fit the desires of the corporation but not the needs of the graduate. The work place is a rapidly evolving environment and the individual is not prepared properly to be a rapidly evolving worker.

Our institutions of learning are following the dictates of the corporation with little consideration of the student. Because this situation will never change until the citizens demand it one must recognize that any change must be contemplated as the responsibility of each individual. The individual can depend upon no institution to prepare them for the ability to evolve through out their work life.

The specificity of a given high school or college education is very beneficial during the early years of ones work life but this specificity is a drag on the rest of the work life. One must, in my opinion, learn how to learn and how to become a more flexible citizen thereby rolling with the punches of change.

A word to the wise is said to be sufficient, but I doubt that any of us qualify for a high grade in wisdom. Nevertheless, if you do not prepare yourself for such a future you might very well live to regret it.
 
I am a retired engineer and I shall give to you what my understanding of the education of an engineer is all about; I do this because I think that almost all professional education in the US and elsewhere are very similar.

You obviously haven't been in engineering education in a long time. Or perhaps you're just deeply, deeply, misremembering.

But, no.

A young person receiving an education in engineering is taught the algorithms, patterns, and paradigms of their chosen profession. Essentially the student is taught the manual of the profession; just as a mechanic is taught the very same thing regarding the repair of automobiles.

No, quite the contrary. Engineering students are not taught the manual of their chosen profession, but the principles underlying the manual. At my university, there are something like three different computer-related degrees available. Oddly enough, the people who graduate with the least knowledge of hands-on computer practices are the computer science students. They tend not to be able to administer networks (the IT department teaches that) or to create high-end animated web-pages (the Web technologies department teaches that).

Similarly, most automotive engineering students (and automotive engineers) make lousy mechanics. They may understand what a piston ring does and how it works -- but they can't actually change the rings.

Precisely because there are two-year automotive mechanics' schools out there that do a much better and cheaper job of giving you the rote skills.

The education of the professional is a rote learning of specific facts and how to utilize the tools of the trade as the patterns of the specific job dictate.

No. The education of the engineering professional (at least since the mid 70s or so) is exactly the opposite -- teaching the principles underlying the specific facts, so that the engineers can both derive the facts as needed, and (more importantly) update the facts as new knowledge comes along to change the underlying assumptions that the standard "tools" are based upon.

And that difference is precisely what defines "engineering."
 

Back
Top Bottom