Holy crap! An animation about DNA that was made by the company I work for is used in that!
I haven't seen it. The feeling I get from what little I know is that it's pro-evolution, but points out the shortfalls and silliness in the way the "battle for America's minds" has been fought.I'm assuming this is a pro-evolution film; is that right? Has anyone actually seen it? Is it any good?
I'm assuming this is a pro-evolution film; is that right? Has anyone actually seen it? Is it any good?
but points out the shortfalls and silliness in the ... "battle for America's minds" ...
Quoting out-of-context for poor humour effect:
/me dons flame-proof suit
A lack of minds to battle for?
/me backs away from thread
I'm assuming this is a pro-evolution film; is that right? Has anyone actually seen it? Is it any good?
I did see parts of this film and it is pro-evolution. Interesting points from the film are
1) Micheal Behe says he is a skeptic.
2) When someone shows you a picture of Mount Rushmore and asks if this looks created (making a creationist argument) you need to answer better than yes especially if others are watching.
3) People who support creationism often seem nicer than those who support evolution because the creationist are often just ignorant nice people but the anti-creationists try to humiliate their opponents.
4) Creationism is an end point of thinking. Once you say it was created nothing new will be learned.
I think that is a good synopsis of the film. The film's reference to dodos has to do with winning or losing the debate and while clearly the filmaker sides with the proevolution side, he wonders if the other side has better PR. My wife, eventhough she agrees with evolution, did not like the scientists who were filmed sitting around the poker table attacking ID.