• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A Feast of Unrepentant Wingnuts

NWO Sentryman

Proud NWO Gatekeeper
N
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
6,994
by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

Egalitarian societies are more productive than societies in which a mere one percent owns more than some 90 percent of the rest of the population. Since 1980, US productivity declined with the dollar in a race to the bottom. The results may be seen quantified at the CIA's 'World Fact Book' where the US is at the bottom of a list of nations with the world's largest negative current account balance. It is not coincidental that America became the world's largest net debtor nation as it joined the ranks of the most inequitable.

American politics has been hijacked by a tiny coterie of right-wing economic extremists, some of them ideological zealots, others merely greedy, a few of them possibly insane. The scope of their triumph is breathtaking. Over the course of the last three decades, they have moved from the right-wing fringe to the commanding heights of the national agenda. Notions that would have been laughed at a generation ago--that cutting taxes for the very rich is the best response to any and every economic circumstance or that it is perfectly appropriate to turn the most rapacious and self-interested elements of the business lobby into essentially an arm of the federal government--are now so pervasive, they barely attract any notice.

The result has been a slow motion disaster. Income inequality has approached levels normally associated with Third World oligarchies, not healthy Western democracies. The federal government has grown so encrusted with business lobbyists that it can no longer meet the great public challenges of our time. Not even many conservative voters or intellectuals find the result congenial. Government is no smaller--it is simply more debt-ridden and more beholden to wealthy elites.

--Feast of the Wingnuts: How economic crackpots devoured American politics

The US won the race to the bottom begun with the ascension of Ronald Reagan to the White House.
Click to expand...


existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2009/06/feast-of-unrepentant-wingnuts.html

Sorry if i am spamming. I just wanted a few things cleared up from this blog.
 
Some economic issues, although the author is clearly left wing (Why "Terrorism" is worse under GOP Regimes) posts pictures comparing bush to hitler, Idolises JFK etc.

And some of the articles he puts up, which will be for another time.
 
thought_fugitive said:
I think he means you should posit specific questions relevant to the article you cited.
Click to expand...

well, i was reading on the blog about somethign he called the L-Curve.

He was also saying about Carter's economic record was better than any post WW2 GOP President ("Evidence that Bush will cancel the elections and declare martial law"*)

And saying in General that liberals are better on the economy.

Finally, some things on JFK ("Why JFK had to die", which says EO 11110 as well as his "thousand pieces" comment got him shot)

*i am not going to give him the pleasure of linking to his blog.
 
Yup. I don't intend to be rude, but the general idea here is to post an opinion - submit it for discussion/debate. So far all you've offered is that the blog author leans to the left (no argument here).

The blog looks to be long on opinion and short of fact. That doesn't make its conclusions wrong, but you are right to want to gain a better understading of the facts before accepting or rejecting his conclusions.

So, what particular economic points of his bug you?
 
Is the German economic system sound?

Does government invetvention in the economy work?

And he also says that the MIC is "Murder, inc." But an MIC is inevitable in every industrialised country, am i correct.

As well as that, he says that the GOP has created a "third world america", and that reagan encouraged outsourcing.

And some of the above as well, to do with the "L-curve" that he refers to and carter's economic record.
 
NWO Sentryman said:
Is the German economic system sound?
Click to expand...
"sound"? Sure. They maintain one of the worlds largest economies and export a LOT. Their economy is doing very well AFAIK. But, they experience cyclical problems just as we do.

NWO Sentryman said:
Does government invetvention in the economy work?
Click to expand...
In fact it is necessary. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a USA with no FDA and no EPA.

NWO Sentryman said:
And he also says that the MIC is "Murder, inc." But an MIC is inevitable in every industrialised country, am i correct.
Click to expand...
Um, "MIC"? I don't see any relevant reference to "Murder" in the blog entry.

NWO Sentryman said:
As well as that, he says that the GOP has created a "third world america", and that reagan encouraged outsourcing.
Click to expand...
the first bit is hyperbole. The second is somewhat true as far as I remember. he was big on free trade and privatization and pushing those also meant favoring outsourcing to some degree. I suspect his thought was more on how to fix what he saw as wrong with socialist countries than it was on internal US economic policy, though. He wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed.

NWO Sentryman said:
And some of the above as well, to do with the "L-curve" that he refers to and carter's economic record.
Click to expand...
I saw no mention of Carter in the blog post. What about the Laffer Curve interests you?
 
NWO Sentryman said:
The Carter comments were in 2time to stick a fork in reagan's ass", the Murder Inc. comments were in previous entries, the L-curve as from www.lcurve.org
Click to expand...


Only someone who had yet to be born at the time could write such leftist drivel with a straight face.

The author is a pig-ignorant fool.


So, anything else you need to have cleared up?
 
NWO Sentryman said:
Is the German economic system sound?
Click to expand...
A little too export-orientated, but large, prosperous and with solid public finances. And a strong social safety net.

Does government invetvention in the economy work?
Click to expand...
If the government is competent about it. It seems to me in the US many people are so convinced government intervention is bad, that if the government screws it up, instead of being angry at incompetent politicians and voting them out, they actually feel happy because it vindicates their beliefs.

And he also says that the MIC is "Murder, inc." But an MIC is inevitable in every industrialised country, am i correct.
Click to expand...
Military Industrial Congressional Complex?

The problem is not so much its existence, but the influence it exercises on government policy.
Fact is that many members of Congress love to bring jobs to their district by purchasing new military equipment and keeping military bases open, regardless of their benefits to the country as a whole. The US is quite unique in that regard, and wastes a lot money.
In addition, this abundance of unused military power also tempts people and politicians to find new uses, in other words, to increase its military interventions. Much like a salary-increase tempts people to spend more.
 
balrog666 said:
Only someone who had yet to be born at the time could write such leftist drivel with a straight face.

The author is a pig-ignorant fool.
Click to expand...

Pig-ignorant is thinking Reagan had a clue what he was doing, if he actually wanted to help keep America strong, healthy and prosperous.

If his actual intentions were to steal everything he could and sell it to his owners in corporate America, he was a genius.

(Actually, I am convinced his brain sprang a leak some time prior to 1970.)
 
My two cents. Surely it is very bad for a society to have things skewed to the point where some tiny fraction owns the vast majority of the wealth, but the real questions are how and why it got that way and how to balance things into something that is reasonable. People are inclined to blame the disparity in wealth on free market capitalism when in fact a large part of this disparity is the result of collusion between industry and government. Much of the regulation that has been put in place was put in place to discourage and eliminate genuine competition.

Government erects barriers to entry to serve the interests of those already entrenched, typically under the guise of some sort of consumer protection. This is sometimes called crony capitalism. We see it in the military industrial complex. We saw it with the development of the railroads and in mining and in oil. We have seen it in the financial industry and in banking. Those with money and influence use their access to power to eliminate real competition and the real role most regulation has played for the most part is to protect the interests of those already entrenched. This is not free market capitalism. It is a kind of national corporatism which is a form of facism. This happens not only on a grand scale with giant corporations, but also at other levels of government - regulation of taxis and hotdog vendors and everything else.
 
Typical loonie hippes confuse the laffer curve and the tax theories based on it with the policies of the last president.

Its an intentional act of ignorance that helps solidify their world view.

Reagan accepted supply side economics. Reagan was actually an intellectual (shocker).

Bush believed in tax cuts. He believed that taxes in general were too high.

Those are two stances which are not the same.

Taxes:
Under Reagan they went down
Up under Bush I
Up under Clinton
Down under Bush II
Will go up under Obama

I say that the author's basic premise that the country is ruled by a few right wing radical economists is plain silly and deserves no serious attention.

Of the two presidents who did cut taxes, only one actually implemented a Laffer cut. So even between those two you cannot make the case that their economic ideas were the same.
 
Bush, Sr. didn't agree with Reaganomics, so to speak, at all. He was the one who invented the term "voodoo economics" in the 1980 or '76 GOP primaries.

He had no problem enjoying Reagan's popularity, and when he had his chance as president, strayed from it, and suffered the consequences.
 
Last edited:
NWO Sentryman said:
existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2009/06/feast-of-unrepentant-wingnuts.html

Sorry if i am spamming. I just wanted a few things cleared up from this blog.
Click to expand...
Sure. I'll clear something up for you.

Your apology in advance for spamming is not accepted, except insofar as it verifies your level of selfawareness of spambotness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom