Very interesting. It seems that Mexico is indignant over the US securing it's borders.
All of this begs the question, a couple actually.
-Does a nation have the right to use all means necessary to secure it's borders?
-Does a nation have a right to wink at it's own laws because of international pressure?
-WTF is wrong with Mexico?
Whatever his reasons for sneaking over the border, the shooting of Mr. Martínez, 20, has fanned the flames of anger in Mexico over what many here see as an increasingly hard line in the United States against illegal immigrants. His death has become a rallying point for politicians of all stripes, who have condemned the shooting as a racist violation of human rights.
Mr. Martínez was killed two weeks after the House of Representatives passed a bill that, among other provisions, would build an additional 700 miles of tall double fences like the one here to stop illegal immigrants.
The proposed "frontier wall," as the barrier is called here, and Mr. Martínez's death have become symbols of what many Mexicans see as the deteriorating relationship between the countries and a rising tide of xenophobia in the United States.
The wall has prompted street protests in the capital and howls of criticism from Mexican politicians and editorialists, many of whom have likened the proposal to the Berlin Wall. Two Catholic bishops, in a statement, called the proposal "absurd, shameful and intolerable" and "an aspirin against cancer."
President Vicente Fox has called the wall "a disgrace," and a "very bad sign" that "does not befit a country that prides itself on being democratic."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/14/international/americas/14mexico.html
All of this begs the question, a couple actually.
-Does a nation have the right to use all means necessary to secure it's borders?
-Does a nation have a right to wink at it's own laws because of international pressure?
-WTF is wrong with Mexico?