• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

911 Investigation obstructed

LastChild

Banned
L
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
2,062
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html

As a legal matter, it is not up to us to examine the C.I.A.’s failure to disclose the existence of these tapes. That is for others. What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the president, to investigate one the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction. - Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton

Let the apologies and excuses begin.
 
Last edited:
How many threads were you planning on starting for this, LastChild?
 
Wow... you are obsessed with getting what's on those tapes out in the open aren't you?

You just can't wait to see the CIA personnel on those tapes identified by Al-Queada and thier families targeted, can you?

Just who are you working for, 'Child?
 
This is as relevant as anything else for a LC thread...

 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
This is as relevant as anything else for a LC thread...

Click to expand...

Oh gawd... I'll talk... I'LL TALK!

The guns are in the hall closet, the big yellow one with the 2 gallon backpack is loaded, but there's no water in the pressure chamber. just, please... make it stop!
 
LastChild said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html

As a legal matter, it is not up to us to examine the C.I.A.’s failure to disclose the existence of these tapes. That is for others. What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the president, to investigate one the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction. - Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton

Let the apologies and excuses begin.
Click to expand...
Ah, you proceed to mess up and fall into the news media political junk! Good job, you are confused with what my Grandmother figures out back in the twenties. You have no idea why the CIA destroyed the tapes! You have fallen for the lies of 9/11 truth and the political nonsense going on for a long time.
 
The commission was given transcripts of the interviews because it's all that was needed for them. There would be no purpose in them needing the video tapes and the issue of the interrogation techniques were not what was in question. I think it's safe to assume that the reason for them not wanting to give them the video tape is because of the methods used to get the information. But keep in mind these tapes (and again the transcripts were given over) were of low level operatives, neither of which was involved in 9/11, but simply provided information about how Al Qeada works. The CIA destroyed the tape because there was no point in keeping them. They have the transcripts, why would they still need the tapes?

However, there are some idiots out there who think this is part of some conspiracy involving 9/11.
 
LastChild said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html

As a legal matter, it is not up to us to examine the C.I.A.’s failure to disclose the existence of these tapes. That is for others. What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the president, to investigate one the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction. - Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton

Let the apologies and excuses begin.
Click to expand...
The etiquette of this forum requests that you give a considered editorial on linked media. Please do so.
 
What bearing do those tapes have on what actually happened on 9/11?

Oh wait... none...

-Gumboot
 
This message is hidden because LastChild is on your ignore list.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHAHA...this is awesome. I can see why you guys like using it so much. This subforum seems so much more peaceful.
 
gumboot said:
What bearing do those tapes have on what actually happened on 9/11?

Oh wait... none...

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

Really? You know what's was on them?

So why didn't they just hand them over instead of hiding and then destroying them? What's the investigation about and why are Kean and Hamilton commenting on it?

Excuses and apologies. That's all debunking 9/11 is really about. You debunkers must be proud at how you contribute to the pursuit of truth into what Hamilton and Kean deem one of the greatest tragedies to confront this country.
 
LastChild said:
Really? You know what's was on them?

So why didn't they just hand them over instead of hiding and then destroying them? What's the investigation about and why are Kean and Hamilton commenting on it?

Excuses and apologies. That's all debunking 9/11 is really about. You debunkers must be proud at how you contribute to the pursuit of truth into what Hamilton and Kean deem one of the greatest tragedies to confront this country.
Click to expand...


Kean and Hamilton have not become conspiracy liars. Whether or not the CIA was justified in destroying those videos is irrelevant to the fantasy movement's myths and fabrications.
 
Jonnyclueless said:
The commission was given transcripts of the interviews because it's all that was needed for them. There would be no purpose in them needing the video tapes and the issue of the interrogation techniques were not what was in question. I think it's safe to assume that the reason for them not wanting to give them the video tape is because of the methods used to get the information. But keep in mind these tapes (and again the transcripts were given over) were of low level operatives, neither of which was involved in 9/11, but simply provided information about how Al Qeada works. The CIA destroyed the tape because there was no point in keeping them. They have the transcripts, why would they still need the tapes?

However, there are some idiots out there who think this is part of some conspiracy involving 9/11.
Click to expand...

You think it's safe to assume? Really? And who the hell are you and how would you know better then them? As far as the transcripts go....


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,316552,00.html

Sources: Destroyed CIA Videotapes Were Hundreds of Hours; No Transcripts Made
 
pomeroo said:
Kean and Hamilton have not become conspiracy liars. Whether or not the CIA was justified in destroying those videos is irrelevant to the fantasy movement's myths and fabrications.
Click to expand...

How relevent is it to debunkers who claim to know the complete truth about 9/11?
 
Last edited:
Sources: Destroyed CIA Videotapes Were Hundreds of Hours; No Transcripts Made
Click to expand...

No doubt all "smoking guns" for TEH INSIDE JORB!!@1

The NWO wins again!
 
Good Lt said:
You're making the assumption that they are relevant.

Prove that they are.
Click to expand...

Really? Did I write that letter? How do you know better? Come on who's the next debunker to step up and make excuses and apologies for failure?
 
How relevent is it to debunkers how claim to no the complete truth about 9/11?
Click to expand...

Was that English?

It's the 9-11 TRUTH MOVEMENT claiming to know TEH TROOF.

And yet, it was only this year that they learned that 19 hijackers actually flew planes into the WTC, not radio controlled planes, space beams, missiles, holograms, etc.

They're still coming to grips with the fact that the towers collapsing had something to do with planes slamming into them and fires and structural damage.

Pathetic that it's taking them going on a decade to know what the rest of the world figured out was happening in the moment, but predictable of small minds.
 
Really? Did I write that letter? How do you know better? Come on who's the next debunker to step up and make excuses and apologies for failure?
Click to expand...

Prove they're relevant.

First, however, prove 9-11 was an inside job.

Ready

Set

Go!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom