"911 inside job chronicles"

[NWO Sentryman]

http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2010/08/911-inside-job-chronicles.html

I find the lack of Logic and Reason in this long winded article disturbing, but it still persists with the Drone theory even though witnesses swear that they saw a plane. Hopefully someone who can wade in the woo long enough can make a more detailed deconstruction.

But this stands out as a potential stundie.

You must believe that soft aluminum can penetrate hard steel despite the fact that if that were so Wenger would make its Swiss Army knives of Aluminum.

 

[Sabretooth]

That article is a complete mess. It reads like a train wreck. He keeps changing gears and offers no evidence for any of his arguments. It’s like he based his entire article on the crap he picked up while watching Loose Change and didn’t bother trying to think for himself.


My fav is here:

Try hurling a ball of modeling clay at a barn door. If you are Mickey Mantle reincarnated you might knock down the door if it is merely propped up. But you will NEVER ever penetrate the door itself. Try it! Another experiment. Replace the lead slug of a 30 caliber round with one of soft aluminum. Fire that round at a steel beam comparable to those at the WTC. Let me know if it ever penetrates the steel! Lotsa luck!

First, I don’t know WTF throwing clay at a barn door is going to show why a plane can’t enter a building. Although, I’d be willing to bet some serious cash that if you got a ball of clay moving at 500 MPH, it would give a barn door a very nice window.

Second, firing a small caliber round at a construction beam also does not produce the same forces as we saw on 9/11. You can’t reduce the mass of one of the two objects and expect the same results. If you fire an aluminum bullet at a piece of steel that scales in size properly, I’d be willing to put my paycheck down that the round would easily penetrate the steel.

This guy is a freakin’ nut job, and every one of his stupid arguments has already been debunked 4 years ago or more.

 

[NutCracker]

That article is a complete mess. It reads like a train wreck. He keeps changing gears and offers no evidence for any of his arguments. It’s like he based his entire article on the crap he picked up while watching Loose Change and didn’t bother trying to think for himself.

What??!!!?? Me not thinking for myself!?!!?? *YOU* are the sheeple! Snort! I recognize a major hole in this ridiculous official conspiracy theory propagated by these NIST clowns when I see one! I don't swallow that nonsense! I instantly recognize reliable information when I see it!



I love his understanding of the design and behaviour of turbofan engines.

 

[Greediguts]

Wow. That whole blog is just....

I clicked on his pic and was taken here. I had no idea James Cromwell from "Babe" was a truther....

 

[NWO Sentryman]

this is the defleshed skeleton of 9/11 truth people. He [Len Hart] represents the last fragments among the left contingent.