A hologram, of course……..
9/11: How they Faked the Videos
- Thread starter yankee451
- Start date
bknight
Master Poster
You still don't get it; eyewitness testimony is trumped by physical evidence. It does not matter that any of your eyewitnesses were misplaced in the accepted scenarios, what makes the difference is the physical evidence. If testimony corroborates the physical evidence so much better if the testimony disagrees with the physical evidence, it is noted and ignored. Simple facts simple truth.
If you have evidence of a conspiracy then present it, but your eyewitnesses will be greeted with a lot of skepticism. I'm a skeptic of your ideas which have so many holes it makes swiss cheese look like cheddar.
Now as to your logic; if B is demonstrably true, it is up to you to show facts that it is true, not opinions, not fuzzy images that could be showing many things.
For example, even though all of your eyewitnesses indicate that the plane flew "north" of CITGO, that trajectory is impossible to hit the Pentagon where it did hit it with the trajectory of damage inside the building, so all those testimonies are wrong.
Name them.
Steve
Penultimate Amazing
No, YOU don't get it!
A PHOTOGRAPH is physical evidence.
A VIDEO is physical evidence.
SKIDMARKS are physical evidence.
SMASHED GLASS is physical evidence.
The INTERNAL DAMAGE to Lloyde's taxi is physical evidence that it was NOT a downed lightpole which impaled it.
ALL of that physical evidence places Father McGraw and Lloyde England north of the heliport at 9:37:46 a.m., which amounts to a whole lot of physical evidence that the plane did NOT fly on the official flightpath.
A CONSTRUCTION TRAILER is physical evidence that a 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon wall.
Many undeformed METAL CLADDING SHEETS on the grounds and the roofs of the Pentagon are physical evidence that this trailer (which was fraudulently claimed to have been moved out the previous day) was exploded from within, as seen in the Gatecam videos.
There is a long trail of VISUAL and PHYSICAL EVIDENCE along the true flightpath.
The jet passed directly overhead of numerous witnesses.
Try mapping their locations, then join the dots, to find where it really flew.
ATC COLIN SCOGGINS reported the jet 6 miles southeast of the White House.
DON CHAUNCEY at St Barnabas & Beltway, 6 miles southeast of the Pentagon, saw the plane fly over his building.
SHIRLEY ENGLAND said the plane flew so low that it almost hit her house.
SEAN LANSDOWNE and his mother felt their house shake and went outside to see the plane fly over their house at 17th St South & Sth Edgewood.
JAMAL EL KOURNAYTI saw the jet flying from their house, up the driving range and over the building where he was working, at the Army Navy Country Club.
Many top brass at a breakfast meeting in the A-N Country Club saw the plane fly overhead.
Patrons of the Indoor Tennis Club saw the plane above their building.
SHINKI & ED PAIK saw and heard the plane fly over their workshop at Sth Ode St & Columbia Pike.
Numerous NAVY ANNEX STAFF saw the plane above the wings of their building.
ALBERT HEMPHILL, northeast corner, said the plane flew so low over the Navy Annex that it blew the pea gravel all over the roof.
Sgt CHADWICK BROOKS said the jet engine wake blew the trees all about at the eastern end of the Annex.
ISABEL & MICHAEL JAMES at the South Joyce & Columbia Pike traffic lights, saw the belly of the plane overhead. The engine wake blew their car into the kerb.
9 NAVAL CEREMONIAL GUARDS, after officiating at a funeral on top of the cemetery, said the shadow of the plane covered their bus. It made the bus shake.
OMAR CAMPO was planting trees at the Maintenance buildings of the ANC when the plane flew overhead. The engine wake blew the trees around.
VIN NARAYANAN, CHRISTINE PETERSEN, STEVEN MCHALE, CHERYL RYEFIELD, MARY ANN OWENS, AZIZ EL HALLOU, etc all said the plane flew above their cars on Route 27. They were all beside the helipad or further north.
NOBODY on the bridge said the plane flew over their car.
There was a line of PHYSICAL DAMAGE to the roofs of E, D and C Rings (highlighted red), as though from the wake of the right engine of the jet which followed that North of Citgo flyover trajectory.
VILMA CALIX in her 4th floor office overlooking the helipad, testified that she saw the plane flying from over the Navy Annex. Then as it came close by her office, she saw the SIDE and ENGINE of the jet (pink NOC flyover path). NOT the top of the plane (yellow official flightpath.)
DENNIS SMITH, standing outside at Corridors 1/2 in the courtyard, heard the plane, then turned to see the TAIL of the jet before seeing the fireball.
There is a long list of witnesses whose testimony is compatible with the flyover plane.
No, YOU name some specific witnesses whom YOU think support your official flightpath.
I already know far more about many more of them than you do.
There seems to be everything missing from you guys' responses.
Not a single one has addressed ANY point in any of my posts.
You've been festering in this swamp so long that you think sarcasm, derision, ridicule, name-calling, bullying, rudeness, misogyny, arrogance, deflection, misquotes, etc etc are the pre-requisites for intelligent discussion.