• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

8/10 Terrorist conspiracy

I'm saying, you're faulting CTs for not believing it was muslims, when your claiming it was on evidence that's equally as fishy.

"Oh look at this plastic laminated passport from this terrorist's pocket that survived the impact, fireball, ensuing inferno, monstrous collapse, and I jsut dug it out from under 300 tons of flaming steel. 'mo... ham.. ad.. att.. a.' To the bat cave men, its Al qaeda!"
You would have a point if your post in any way represented the reality of the evidence against Al Queada. Instead what you have is a nice little straw man.
 
It was just an observation that you're being affected by group mentality. You feel you have the backing of everyone else on this forum, and the "CTers" are the perceived threat, so you belittle them in the safety of this controlled environment, to make yourself appear more astute among your peers. It's a common bully tactic, like picking on the kid with glasses. That sad part is the kid isn't even here to have his rebuttal.
 
It was just an observation that you're being affected by group mentality. You feel you have the backing of everyone else on this forum, and the "CTers" are the perceived threat, so you belittle them in the safety of this controlled environment, to make yourself appear more astute among your peers. It's a common bully tactic, like picking on the kid with glasses. That sad part is the kid isn't even here to have his rebuttal.

May I suggest you read through the three LC threads before commenting on poster's reactions.
 
It was just an observation that you're being affected by group mentality. You feel you have the backing of everyone else on this forum, and the "CTers" are the perceived threat, so you belittle them in the safety of this controlled environment, to make yourself appear more astute among your peers. It's a common bully tactic, like picking on the kid with glasses. That sad part is the kid isn't even here to have his rebuttal.

Glad to see you didn't waste any time and went straight to the ad homs.
 
It was just an observation that you're being affected by group mentality. You feel you have the backing of everyone else on this forum, and the "CTers" are the perceived threat, so you belittle them in the safety of this controlled environment, to make yourself appear more astute among your peers. It's a common bully tactic, like picking on the kid with glasses. That sad part is the kid isn't even here to have his rebuttal.

Point taken.

Still, I think CTers are a bunch of low-life scum, and I strongly suspect Islamic terrorists of being behind these terrorist plots that have been unfolded today.
 
This event is oddly reminscent of the one in Toronto not too long ago.

You'll have to fill us on on which part is odd. Arrests of terrorist suspects do tend to have some similar components. Suspects and arrests being two. Anything else strikingly similar?
 
This latest event will no doubt be used to prove the controlled demolition theory on WT7. Don't ask me how. It just will.

Liquid explosives were piped throughout the building when Silverstein said "pull it".

(This stuff is easy...)
 
There's a few more CTers in the comments section of comment is free (although a lot of people are arguing against them)

some nutter said:
...why is it such a coincidence that this happens just when Zionists, UK and US are aiding and abetting mass murder in Lebanon...
I find it infuriating how CTs always find these events "convenient" for their pet tyrants. These days (and really always) people in power are up to their eyeballs in bad news that someone, somewhere is blaming on them. Pick any day, and an event occurring that day that reflects positively on the "powers that be" is convenient for them, in one way or another. I tried to make this point to an Insider Jobber, but it only confirmed for him that most of these events are orchestrated. :bwall
 
Having just finished reading through that article I linked, I notice it only talks of the cell being composed of 4 algerians, with no information at all on the other 13 or so that are charged with the plot.
 
That sad part is the kid isn't even here to have his rebuttal.

The kids have been here. Please, as Arkan suggested, read the three LC threads and Christophera's thread on a "Realistice Explanation" before making comments about how isolated and insulated we are here.
 
Having just finished reading through that article I linked, I notice it only talks of the cell being composed of 4 algerians, with no information at all on the other 13 or so that are charged with the plot.

Isn't the investigation still ongoing? And isn't there a gag order? So what's odd about it?
 
Having just finished reading through that article I linked, I notice it only talks of the cell being composed of 4 algerians, with no information at all on the other 13 or so that are charged with the plot.

So you posted the link as evidence BEFORE you read it?
 
I'm saying, you're faulting CTs for not believing it was muslims, when your claiming it was on evidence that's equally as fishy.

"Oh look at this plastic laminated passport from this terrorist's pocket that survived the impact, fireball, ensuing inferno, monstrous collapse, and I jsut dug it out from under 300 tons of flaming steel. 'mo... ham.. ad.. att.. a.' To the bat cave men, its Al qaeda!"

Typical 9-11 Denier doesn't know that it wasn't Atta's passport that was found. But you've done a lot of research into 9-11, haven't you? Watched a few videos?
 
The kids have been here. Please, as Arkan suggested, read the three LC threads and Christophera's thread on a "Realistice Explanation" before making comments about how isolated and insulated we are here.
Many of us have also been "there" (forums and other places [such as Ground Zero] heavily represented by Inside Job proponents).
 

Back
Top Bottom