• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

60 Minutes Interview with James Hansen

Hardenbergh

Graduate Poster
Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Messages
1,073
James Hansen, Scientist, on 60 Minutes/Climate Change

Did anyone listen to James Hansen on 60 Minutes last night? I've been very concerned about the dramatic changes in the climate.

(CBS) As a government scientist, James Hansen is taking a risk. He says there are things the White House doesn't want you to hear but he's going to say them anyway.

Hansen is arguably the world's leading researcher on global warming. He's the head of NASA's top institute studying the climate. But this imminent scientist tells correspondent Scott Pelley that the Bush administration is restricting who he can talk to and editing what he can say. Politicians, he says, are rewriting the science.

But he didn't hold back speaking to Pelley, telling 60 Minutes what he knows.

Asked if he believes the administration is censoring what he can say to the public, Hansen says: "Or they're censoring whether or not I can say it. I mean, I say what I believe if I'm allowed to say it."

What James Hansen believes is that global warming is accelerating. He points to the melting arctic and to Antarctica, where new data show massive losses of ice to the sea.

Is it fair to say at this point that humans control the climate? Is that possible?

"There's no doubt about that, says Hansen. "The natural changes, the speed of the natural changes is now dwarfed by the changes that humans are making to the atmosphere and to the surface."

Those human changes, he says, are driven by burning fossil fuels that pump out greenhouse gases like CO2, carbon dioxide. Hansen says his research shows that man has just 10 years to reduce greenhouse gases before global warming reaches what he calls a tipping point and becomes unstoppable. He says the White House is blocking that message.

"In my more than three decades in the government I've never witnessed such restrictions on the ability of scientists to communicate with the public," says Hansen.

Restrictions like this e-mail Hansen's institute received from NASA in 2004. "… there is a new review process … ," the e-mail read. "The White House (is) now reviewing all climate related press releases," it continued.

Why the scrutiny of Hansen's work? Well, his Goddard Institute for Space Studies is the source of respected but sobering research on warming. It recently announced 2005 was the warmest year on record. Hansen started at NASA more than 30 years ago, spending nearly all that time studying the earth. How important is his work? 60 Minutes asked someone at the top, Ralph Cicerone, president of the nation’s leading institute of science, the National Academy of Sciences.

"I can't think of anybody who I would say is better than Hansen. You might argue that there's two or three others as good, but nobody better," says Cicerone.

And Cicerone, who’s an atmospheric chemist, said the same thing every leading scientist told 60 Minutes.

"Climate change is really happening," says Cicerone.

Asked what is causing the changes, Cicernone says it's greenhouse gases: "Carbon dioxide and methane, and chlorofluorocarbons and a couple of others, which are all — the increases in their concentrations in the air are due to human activities. It's that simple."

But if it is that simple, why do some climate science reports look like they have been heavily edited at the White House? With science labeled "not sufficiently reliable." It’s a tone of scientific uncertainty the president set in his first months in office after he pulled out of a global treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

"We do not know how much our climate could, or will change in the future," President Bush said in 2001, speaking in the Rose Garden of the White House. "We do not know how fast change will occur, or even how some of our actions could impact it."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/17/60minutes/main1415985.shtml
 
Last edited:
Did anyone listen to James Hansen on 60 Minutes last night? I've been very concerned about the dramatic changes in the climate.

Uhhh... what dramatic changes in the climate? The weather is always different. I haven't noticed it being any more different.

When you pretend that everyone believes the same things that you do, it just makes you look like a [religious] nut.
 
Last edited:
Uhhh... what dramatic changes in the climate? The weather is always different. I haven't noticed it being any more different.

When you pretend that everyone believes the same things that you do, it just makes you look like a [religious] nut.

Britain's Prince Charles appears to be fretting over it. There are people worrying about global warming besides "religious nuts."

http://www.grist.org/news/daily/2005/10/31/5/index.html
 
Uhhh... what dramatic changes in the climate? The weather is always different. I haven't noticed it being any more different.
And you've captured so well the way climate scientists do their work. They just walk outside, put their finger in the wind, and say, "seems normal to me!"

By the way, have you gotten out to have a look at the melting ice-caps lately?
 
Hansen is arguably the world's leading researcher on global warming. He's the head of NASA's top institute studying the climate. But this imminent scientist tells correspondent Scott Pelley that the Bush administration is restricting who he can talk to and editing what he can say. Politicians, he says, are rewriting the science.

So why should we trust someone who is merely an imminent scientist? :rolleyes:
 
It seems we always return to the two pronged debate-
1. Is Global warming happening?
2. Are humans causing it?

The answer to 1. is a clear "yes". Ask any geologist, paleoclimatologist, archaeologist or historian. The world has been getting warmer since the end of the Younger Dryas around 10K years ago, albeit with minor reversals.

The answer to 2. is we don't know for sure and may never know for sure, but the circumstantial evidence is accumulating. The full story is by no means in yet, but that's no reason to go lighting fires in the middle of the floor or burning irreplaceable fuel for the sheer fun of it. Even if global warming is a total myth, we still need to reduce energy wastage.
 

Back
Top Bottom