• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

25 years ago this day.

kookbreaker

Evil Fokker
Joined
Aug 23, 2001
Messages
15,888
On December 9th, a few hours from this writing. Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner was issuing a traffic citation to a wrong way driver who attempted to puch him. Faulkner had subdued the man with minimal violence when he was shot in the back by another man. Drawing his own weapon, Faulkner was able to shoot his assailant before collapsing, wherupon the assailant shot Faulkner several times in the face, killing him outright.

Faulkner's murderer was one Wesley Cook, better known to the world as Mumia Abu Jamal. Unable to escape due to the gunshot wound, Mumia was quickly picked up by police only a few yards away from his victim. Witnesses were able to identify him at the site.

Mumia had his day in court. Since every single piece of evidence pointed to his guilt, Mumia attempted to turn his court case into a Chicago 7 radical madhouse in an effort to get some kind of mistrial The judge would not have any of it, and the case proceeded depsite his and his allies attempts at disruption. His lawyer, hampered already with a loser of a case and by Mumia's withholding of critical files, did his best, but the outcome was inevitable: Guilty. Mumia would be sentenced to death.

Several years passed, and somehow, perhaps due to some alleged skill at writing, Mumia became a cause celebre amongst the College socialist/activist/anti-globalist set. The 'Free Mumia' T-shirt in its time was perhaps more popular than the Che shirt worn by the same crowd.

Word spread, and myths were invented by Mumia's new lawyers. Despite his being found guilty, neither Mumia, nor his own brother (the person Faulkner was citing for driving the wrong way) gave an explanation for the events of that day until very recently, and then it was a tale that made not a bit of sense.

The myths became legends in the Mumia supporters, despite their total lack of truth. Even worse was how the 'Free Mumia' crowd loved to play the conspiracy game boths ways: Mumia didn't do it, but he had a right to kill Faulkner anyway. Mumia's most ardent supporters were all too happy to slander Faulkner in any way possible, one vocal supporter even calling Faulkner a child prostitute pimp.

But often this level of attitude was rare. Many college students who donned the infamous T-shirts were unaware there was a real murder victim in this case. If you were to ask one, the better odds were that they didn't even know Faulkner's name. Many just heard from a friend that Mumia was a 'political prisoner' and thought it would be cool to support a guy like that. The ones that did know were often unaware of basic legal concepts, or were clueless about the evidence in the trial.

None of the myths started by Mumia's lawyers held any water. The most famous was that the shell found in Faulkner was from a .45, when Mumia had a .38. in an appeal trial even Mumia's own ballistics expert had to admit that was not true, and the evidence was that the bullets found in Faulkner matched the ammo in Mumia's gun. Other myths, such as claims that Mumia's lawyer was inept (he wasn't he was a very good murder trial lawyer) or that no money was given for Mumia's defense (untrue) plus dozens of others myths all made for a deliberately constructed conspriacy theory. Mumia-mania hit such a stride that the citizens of Paris named a city street after him. Thanks guys, next time someone kills a gendarme perhaps Philly should name an alley after the killer?

Several appeals fell flat, mostly due to lack of anything resembling a half-way decent reason for anyone to consider the trial or the case improper in any manner. When the main appeal reached the PA supreme court, a group that cannot agree on anything (much like the SCOTUS) they voted unanimously against the appeal, pointing out the sloppy and useless 'evidence' brought to the trial. Mumia supporters were shocked, after all myths they beleived had to be true, but of course they weren't. Mumia's lawyers built a house of media-straw that could not withstand even light court-based scrutiny. But the faithful still held on.

In what would have been his final days, Mumia latched onto a crazy confessor's wild and impossible story as the 'real tale' of what happened to Faulkner. It was a pathetic attempt, and in fact was still not a tale written by Mumia or his brother. They merely signed their names to the bottom of the crazy confessor's fairy tale. Oddly enough, the lawyers who had worked so hard to spread myths about the case had previously sung praises of Mumia for his prior unwillingness to use the laughable tale.

Mumia still lingers on Death Row. But a 2001 judgement (hailed incorrectly by Mumia lovers as something equal to a mistrial) put his death sentence in suspension due to a procedural problem. Mumia is in limbo
and has been for the past five years.

Mumia-mania went into decline in early 2001 with that court decision. Since then, the events of 9-11 took even more attention away from Mumia. At first due to shock, but then by the 911 conspiracies appealing to the same college world-saver crowd. They apparently decided that it was easier to turn Bush/Cheney into overwrought cartoon supervillains than it was to explain why so much effort had been made to frame a Taxi cab driver.

Twenty-five years ago today, Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner was killed...by Mumia Abu Jamal.
 
http://danielfaulkner.com/index1.html

Daniel Falkner had 25 years of life. Tomorrow he has been gone 25 years.

His killer has had 25 years of appeals. 25 years of groceries. 25 years of a roof over his head and 25 years of medical care.

25 years to play the courts. 25 years to become a cause celebre.

25 years to spin a myth.
 
I once confronted a student about Che. She recommended that I watch the "Motorcycle Diaries" and I did. It was OK, but I wasn't inspired.

Curious about Che, I did some research. I read that he "enjoyed executing prisoners." This disturbed me. You can say it was a war, killing happened on both sides, but to enjoy it executions? That bothered me.

I mentioned this to the student, and she said.. "But it was for a good cause."

Sigh. We sure do love our myths.
 
both sides do.

None of us get off free.

I am ignorant on this issue--not siding one way or the other.
 
both sides do.

None of us get off free.

I am ignorant on this issue--not siding one way or the other.

This is true.. I don't know that what I read about Che was true, but I still found the student's response chilling.
 
I just watched "Hotel Rwanda". Despite the fact that I had a student who survived the Rwandan genocide (and thus had a ready-made excuse for siding with one of the factions), the scariest part of the film was the final escape, when you saw (spoiler) that people on both sides were refugees, fleeing from certain death.

No good guys, no bad guys.

Ok, plenty of bad guys.

"We have met the enemy, and he is us."

*sigh*
 
I once confronted a student about Che. She recommended that I watch the "Motorcycle Diaries" and I did. It was OK, but I wasn't inspired.

Curious about Che, I did some research. I read that he "enjoyed executing prisoners." This disturbed me. You can say it was a war, killing happened on both sides, but to enjoy it executions? That bothered me.

I mentioned this to the student, and she said.. "But it was for a good cause."

Sigh. We sure do love our myths.

At least she knew something about Che. I've called out 20 students in the past 3 years for wearing a Che Tshirt and 4 have known anything beyond "Jay-Z wore one in his video".

Now back to Faulkner. I've never understood why so many people in college will take up the cause of any intelligent or eloquent speaker/writer then within a month of graduating either drop it or reverse position.
 
I was involved with campus/community radio when I was a student in the early 1990's. At the time Mumia Abu Jamal had made a number of radio commentaries that were being circulated by cassette tapes around North America and played on campus radio. I know our station played them. At the annual general meeting that year, there was a motion to purchase the tapes outright for the station and also someone set up a tin for donations. Neither was very successful. There was an attempt to push it as a cause celebre but it really didn't catch on. I did hear the tapes. Mumia Abu Jamal is a strong public speaker. He admitted that he was on the scene and that he had a gun and that no one else was around but he didn't shoot the officer and that he was framed. Even hearing Mumia himself explain it, it didn't make any sense.
 
Thanks for that, kookbreaker. That story was entirely new to me.
 
Mumia Abu Jamal is a strong public speaker. He admitted that he was on the scene and that he had a gun and that no one else was around but he didn't shoot the officer and that he was framed. Even hearing Mumia himself explain it, it didn't make any sense.

He has avoided telling any kind of story as much as he possibly could. I'm surprised he admitted to having a gun, usually it takes a lot just to get him to admit he was even on the scene.

Telling the story, of course, means it has to make some kind of sense while still making you innocent to your adoring fans. I understand a lot of folks stepped away from Leonard Peltier's fan club after he admitted to shooting at FBI agents. I guess it was a bit harder to make a politcal prisoner status out of him then. What are you gonna say? "he shot at them..but he didn't want to hurt them!"
 
Yeah I had never heard of it before...

The danielfaulkner.com website has a rebuttal of an Amnesty International report on the trials. Fascinating read. I have always had the opinion that AI were a bunch of ignorant agenda-driven [rule8]'s and this pretty much confirms it. What a load of nonsense.

-Gumboot
 
danielfaulkner.com is also the only website I ever saw that had the ENTIRE transcript of the trial. All the 'Free Mumia' sites had only a fraction of it, usually the sentencing stage where colloege-students-who-think-they-are-lawyers seem to think it is unfair to bring up elements of Mumia's writing after he tries to tell people, on the stand what a nice guy he is.

Those same websites were very, very critical of the trial, and of course proudly claimed it was all terribly unfair. Don't ask for evidence, just take out word for it!

The Amnesty International paper was a joke. The very fact that they didn't even bother to interview a single person involved in the trial or the day of the event, yet claimed that they did immense research puts me in mind of those who claim to research 9-11 by watching youtube videos.
 
Interesting post, KB, wasn't aware of any of this. Conspiracy theorism certainly does appear to be a mindset - into which an event is dialed.

But it still needs to be vigorously opposed.
 
I used to live near Philly, so I have a passing familiarity with this case. I never delved too deeply into it, because my assumption has always been that one does not get onto Death Row without some pretty solid evidence that one belongs there.

Mumia should be executed, and the sooner the better, his bleeding-heart defenders notwithstanding.

ETA: This reminds me of a similar case in Texas, where a woman was executed for killing her husband and two young children. She loudly proclaimed her innocence, in the face of overwhelming evidence of her guilt, and her cause was taken up by the liberal loon left down there. Her name was Frances Newton, if anyone's interested in reading about her case.
 
Last edited:
The Amnesty International paper was a joke. The very fact that they didn't even bother to interview a single person involved in the trial or the day of the event, yet claimed that they did immense research puts me in mind of those who claim to research 9-11 by watching youtube videos.

Name one organization (or person) that doesn't make mistakes.
 
The only time I'd ever heard the name Abdul Mumia Jabal was in a line in a Michael Frante song.

Now I know what it's all about....the rhyme.
 
I have only passing awareness of the case (I graduated the year before it occurred). I don't think Mumia should be executed. However I do think he should rot in jail, sans any special priviledges including media access. From what I can find in a quick search, he had his many opportunities to clear his name - he failed abysmally each time, and simply dug a deeper hole to wallow in. Live (and die) with it, dude.
 
Name one organization (or person) that doesn't make mistakes.

Mis understanding the facts is a mistake.

Willfully ignoring them because they don't fit your anti American and anti death penalty agenda is a different matter.
 
It is just one in a long line - Ruben Carter (Hurricane) Of Bob Dylan fame comes to mind.

I understand courts can make errors, proceedure not followed correctly. Thats what appeals are about. The fact he can not even get a hearing says more about the lack of new evidence or issues with proceedure than his innocence.

It is interesting to see Che make a resurgence. There is no doubt he had character flaws, but as an icon of freedom fighters etc, his postion could not be challenged. But having said that. His time and place have definately passed
 
Name one organization (or person) that doesn't make mistakes.

Claus,

Can you read the rebuttal and really tell me that this was a mistake, and not deliberate, planned dishonesty? AIUSA went out of their way to avoid getting information that might point to Mumia being guilty. They essentially just parroted what Mumia's lawyers were claiming with a bit more dramatic license.

It is the equivelant of a major news organization saying they did 'extensive research' on 911 and then you find out all they did was watch Loose Change.

In fairness, this was AIUSA, not the international organization. I have my disagreements with AI but they were not directly responsible for this 'paper'.
 

Back
Top Bottom