Come on Mycroft. These guys were right-wing extremists, not Islamic facists.
OK, then, what did Belgium do to make them so violent? Let's see--allowing non-white immigrants, for a start, which the right-wingers see as an "invasion" of Belgium.
Since the white people in Belgium are the natives there, this automatically means that it is justified for them to see immigration of people that are not like them as "colonialist imperialism" on the part of, say, Egypt or Nigeria, and it is a justified reason for murderous violence. For reference, see the numerous learned articles about the "root cause" interpretation of the Arab-israeli conflict.
If anybody is not quite convinced, remember that we all know that if they are murderous and terroristic this just proves to all skeptics that justice really
has to be on their side. As is well known, terrorism is caused by desperation, hopelessness, etc., and is the tool of the powerless against their evil opressors. So, automatically, using terrorism means your cause is just, even if being a native wasn't already enough to prove it.
What is the solution? No point in punishing the terrorists; it's counterproductive overreaction, and besides, for every white-power terrorist you arrest, you'll just make them martyrs and make more moderate whites (who just want to expel the foreigners out of Belgium by stages) join the ranks of the terrorists. No, the only solution is to deal with the root cause: the basic injustice that caused them to become terrorists in the first place.
Since "dealing with the root cause" means "accepting the genocidal thug's grivances", in this case, that it is unbearable to ask him to live next to people he considers foreigners, especially if they have different skin color/religion, I suggest applying the same standards here. Belgium should deport all non-white foreign invaders and thus deal with the "root cause" of the far-right's terror.
At the
very least, Belgium should adopt a "two-state solution", allowing both whites and non-whites to live in parts of Belgium, but giving another part of the state to the white-power groups in order to set up a purely white independent state.
It is true that the white power people's constitution (or, at least, their beliefs) refuse to recognize the legitimacy of non-whites living
anywhere in Belgium (or Europe for that matter), whether in their white-only state or not, but surely such views are (a) just rhetoric, and (b) an understandable reaction to the invasion of foreigner non-whites in the first place.
Surely, if only their demands will be met and they will be given their their own all-white state, they will moderate and accept the foreigners living elsewhere, despite repeatedly saying and doing everything possible to make it absolutely clear the exact opposite is true. After all, this strategy of appeasement worked so well in moderating Hitler, Pol Pot, the Ayatollah Humeini, etc., so let nobody say it's unrealistic.
