victor zammit

I am sure most of you know who Victor Zammit is. But if you don't here is his website: http://www.victorzammit.com/ He is a fundamentalist spiritualist and his website claims scientific "objective" evidence has proven the afterlife and that skeptics deny, ignore and supress the evidence. He...

Just posted is an update covering Victor Zammit and his stepped-up promotion of TV psychic detectives, specifically Noreen Renier and Laurie McQuary at http://www.gpinquirygroup.com/gpinqu...it%20page.html I know many JREF readers are fully knowledgeable about Zammit's anti-skeptical rants, but...

Retired Australian attorney and author Victor James Zammit has in December 2011 released news titled “Justice Done!” in his report on litigation between a skeptic and psychic. His breaking news apparently due to his own perceptions of what might be relevant to readers completely ignores...

Hi all, I was on YouTube and came across this video entitled: "James Randi Challenge Exposed- A Lawyer Explains" (I would have posted the link but I'm still too new) What is this guy talking about? Is there any truth to this or is he just blabbering on in defence of the charlatans and...

Hi Guys Can you share any knowledge and Randi' point of view on Leslie Flint. I came across his name while trying to understand logic behing Zammit and his test that something that doesn't exist must be proven that in fact it doesn't exist- obviously he is pretty nutts. Flint is the most...

Elsewhere on this forum is the discussion related to the March 2nd Inside Edition psychic detective sting which involved Portland Oregon psychic detective Laurie McQuary. Here however I'd like to make sure everyone is keeping track of how once again --- for what I count as the fourth time ---...

There's a glaring hole in the articles list on SkepticWiki known as "Victor Zammit". The Wikipedia bio is thin and virtually useless. Can anyone oblige?

Has anyone else read this: http://www.victorzammit.com/skeptics/winston.html I'm not an expert debator or logician by any means, but even i can see some of the obvious flaws in his arguments... I've tackled a couple below:

The red text in following link put me off reading very far.Apparently a lawyer is offering a million to anyone who can disprove psychics,afterlife etc. *yawn" Bear in mind the forum is run by Faeden(ardent believer of ghosts and who sulks if you mention Dennis Mckenzie in connection with Soham...

The first link is to Zammit's account of the seance, and the second is to a critique of Zammit's account by novelist Michael Prescott. http://www.victorzammit.com/articles/davidthompson.html http://michaelprescott.typepad.com/michael_prescotts_blog/

Hi, folks. Yet again, one of my regular reads, the British magazine Fortean Times, has taken some cheap shots at Randi and skeptics. The piece in question appears on page 15 of issue #194 (April 2005), titled "X-ray Eye Exam." The authors seem to be rather displeased with the examination of...

I don't know if this was already brought up here but, Check this out $1000000 to anyone DISproving existnce of after life... http://www.victorzammit.com/skeptics/challenge.html what do you think is it doible? probably not... probably to many conditions on it to actualy disprove anything...

This Zammit guy's really got it bad for Randi: http://www.victorzammit.com/skeptics/index.html

Check out this web page for a festival of fallacies: http://atl-perimeter.hiexpress.com/pages/scientific_proof_for_the_existence_of_god.html I have sent the following email to them. Let's see what response I get: Dear site maintainers, I am a PhD candidate at the University of Queensland's...

Thought all, including Randi, would be interested to hear this account: Read the Keen Comments: http://www.victorzammit.com/articles/ultimatepsychiccon.html

Thought all here, including Randi, would be interested in reading this account. Read at: MONTAGUE KEEN WRITES http://www.victorzammit.com/articles/ultimatepsychiccon.html

I'm trying to compose a response to this page: http://skeptics.victorzammit.com/reward.html I'd be grateful if someone would check my argument is sound and my analogy is good. Logic/grammar corrections appreciated, improvements welcome. Ta. Zammit: Considering the [JREF $1,000,000] offer has...