link
I understand the state has a right to regulate which words can appear on a plate, but if they can't come up with a better reason than it "may be offensive to the general public," they should give up the fight.
CNN story
It is a way to generate revenue (users pay an extra $25) and I am always in favor of optional taxes, but it is kind of strange. I personally don't see it as running afoul of the First Amendment because the other optional plates that the state offers are not necessarily endorsements...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.