nfpa 921

I have been promising to do a thorough debunking of Erik Lawyer and his analysis of NFPA 921. Well, here it is. (A special thanks to Josarhus who was kind enough to get me the copy of NFPA 921 early, as school does not start for another week or so. Thanks! ) First, we will analyze this...

Kevin Ryan is at it again, shrieking that NIST was supposed to have tested the rubble of the WTC for explosives based on a supposed requirement under "NFPA 921." It was not my impression that this document has any force of law when the cause of a fire or explosion is known. He then goes on to...